AbbottA. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
2.
AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18, 83–104.
3.
AlvessonM. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13–33.
4.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 247–271.
5.
BakkenT.HernesT. (2006). Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. Organization Studies, 27, 1599–1616.
6.
BarleyS. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16–20.
7.
BarleyS. R. (2010). Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31, 777–805.
8.
BattilanaJ.AntebyM.SengulM. (2010). The circulation of ideas across academic communities: When locals re-import exported ideas. Organization Studies, 31, 695–713.
9.
BaumJ. A. C. (2007). Cultural group selection in organization studies. Organization Studies, 28(1), 37–47.
10.
BaumJ. A. C. (2011). European and North American approaches to organizations and strategy research: An Atlantic divide? Not. Organization Science, 22, 1663–1679.
11.
BoxenbaumE.RouleauL. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36, 272–296.
CavellS. (1987). Disowning knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ChiaR. (2002). Time, duration and simultaneity: Rethinking process and change in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 23, 863–868.
15.
CooperR. (2007). Organs of process: Rethinking human organization. Organization Studies, 28, 1547–1573.
16.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 36, 12–32.
17.
CornelissenJ.DurandR. (2012). More than just novelty: Conceptual blending and causality. Academy of Management Review, 37, 152–154.
18.
CorvellecH. (Ed.). (2013). What is theory? Answers from the social and cultural sciences. Malmö: Liber/Copenhagen Business Press (in preparation).
19.
CourpassonD.Arellano-GaultD.BrownA. D.LounsburyM. (2008). Organization studies on the look-out? Being read, being listened to. Organization Studies, 29, 1383–1390.
20.
DavisM. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309–344.
21.
DriverM. (2009). Struggling with lack: A Lacanian perspective on organizational identity. Organization Studies, 30, 55–72.
22.
DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W.HwangH. (2006). Introduction. In DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W.HwangH. (Eds.), Globalization and organization. World society and organizational change (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
FligsteinN. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
FurediF. (2011). On tolerance: A defense of moral independence. London: Continuum.
26.
GabrielY. (2010). Organizations: A space for ideas, identities and agonies. Organization Studies, 31, 757–775.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
GulatiR. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 775–782.
30.
HambrickD. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346–1352.
31.
HannanM. T.PólosL.CarrollG. R. (2007). Logics of organization theory: Audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HaugC. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as social movement infrastructure between organization, network and institution. Organization Studies, 34, 705–732.
34.
HenrichJHeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
HiningsC. R. (2010). Thirty years of Organization Studies: Enduring themes in a changing institutional field. Organization Studies, 31, 659–675.
37.
HirschP. M.LounsburyM. D. (1997). Putting the organization back into organization theory. Action, change, and the ‘new’ institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6, 79–88.
38.
HodgkinsonG. P.RousseauD. (2009). Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It’s already happening. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 534–546.
KonradA. M. (2008). Knowledge creation and the journal editor’s role. In BaruchY.KonradA. M.AguinisH.StarbuckW. H. (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 3–15). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
KilduffM.MehraA.DunnM. B. (2011). From blue sky research to problem solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 36, 297–317.
42.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
LammersC. J. (1995). The organization of mass murder. Organization Studies, 16, 139–156.
44.
LammersC. J. (2003). Occupation regimes alike and unlike: British, Dutch and French patterns of inter-organizational control of foreign territories. Organization Studies, 24, 1379–1403.
45.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
46.
LevyD. L.ScullyM. A. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28, 971–991
47.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
LockeK.Golden-BiddleK. A. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1023–1062.
49.
LounsburyM.CarberryE. (2005). From king to court jester? Weber’s fall from grace in organizational theory. Organization Studies, 26, 501–525.
50.
MacIntyreA. (2007 [1981]). After virtue: A study in moral theory, 3rd edn. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
51.
MarchJ. G. (2007). The study of organizations and organizing since 1945. Organization Studies, 28, 9–19.
52.
McKinleyW.MoneM. A.MoonG. (1999). Determinants and development of schools in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 634–648.
53.
MertonR. K. (1968 [1957]). On sociological theories of the middle range. In MertonR. K. (Ed.), Social theory and social structure, revised and enlarged edn (pp. 39–72). New York: Free Press.
54.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
MutchA. (2007). Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration. Organization Studies, 28, 1123–1140.
57.
OswickC.FlemingP.HanlonG. (2011). From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36, 318–337.
58.
PerrowC. (1991). A society of organizations. Theory and Society, 20, 725–762.
59.
PhillipsN. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625–649.
60.
PopperK. R. (1971 [1945]). The open society and its enemies, 5th revised edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61.
RaelinJ. A. (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 124–129.
62.
ReayT.HiningsC. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.
63.
RitzerG. (2004). The McDonaldization of society. An investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life (rev. edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
64.
SchreyöggG.SydowJ. (2011) Organizational path dependence: A process view. Organization Studies, 32, 321–335.
65.
Schwartz-SheaP.YanowD. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes, New York: Routledge.
66.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row.
StarbuckW. H. (2004). Why I stopped trying to understand the real world. Organization Studies, 25, 1233–1254.
70.
StarbuckW. H. (2007). Living in mythical spaces. Organization Studies, 28, 21–25.
71.
StratiA. (2000). Putting people in the picture: Art and aesthetics in photography and in understanding organizational life. Organization Studies, 21, 53–69.
72.
SuddabyR.HardyC.HuyQ. N. (2011). Where are the new theories of organization? Introduction. Academy of Management Review, 36, 236–246.
73.
TaylorC. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3–51.