AndriopoulosC.LewisM.W.2009. Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovaion. Organization Science, 20(4): 696–717
2.
DacinM. T.DacinM. T.TraceyP.2011. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5): 1203–1213.
3.
DiDomenicoM.TraceyP.HaughH.2009. The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate-Social Enterprise Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30: 887–907.
4.
DiefenbachT.SillinceJ.A.A.2011. Formal and Informal Hierarchy in Different Types of Organization. Organization Studies, 32: 1515–1537.
5.
FarjounM.2010. Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change as a Duality. Academy of Management Review, 35: 2202–225.
6.
GarudR.GehmanJ.KumaraswamyA.2011. Complexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32: 737–767.
7.
GebertD.BoernerS.KearneyE.2010.Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies. Organization Science, 21(2): 593–608.
8.
HatchM.J.ErhlichS.B.1993. Spontaneous Humour as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations. Organization Studies, 14: 505–526.
9.
JarzabkowskiP.SillinceJ.2007. A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28(11): 1639–1665.
10.
JohnstonS.SelskyJ.W.2005. Duality and Paradox: Trust and Duplicity in Japanese Business Practice. Organization Studies, 27: 183–205.
11.
LevinthalD.RerupC.2006. Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less- Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 174: 502–513.
12.
LewisM.W.2000.Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. Academy of Management Review, 25: 760–776.
13.
LuscherL.S.LewisM.W.2008.Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 2221–240.
14.
MironE.ErezM.Naveh. 2004. The Duality of Innovation and Attention to Detail in Quality Improvement Initiatives. Management Science, 50: 1576–1586.
15.
Miron-SpectorE.ErezM.NavehE.2011. Team Composition and Innovation: The Importance of Conformists and Attentive-to-detail Members. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4): 740–760.
16.
QuinnR.CameronK.1988. Paradox and Transformation: A Framework for Viewing Organization and Management. In QuinnR.CameronK. (Eds.), Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management: 289–308. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ.ProbstG.TushmanM.2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20: 685–695.
18.
SmithW.LewisM.2011. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381–403.
19.
SmithW.K.TushmanM.L.2005. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A TopManagement Model for Managing Information Streams. Organization Science, 16(5):522–536.
20.
van DijkS.BerendsH.JelinekM.RommeA.G.L.WeggemanM. 2011. Micro- Institutional Affordances and Strategies of Radical Innovation. Organization Studies, 32: 1485–1513.
21.
VergneJ.DurandR.2011. The Path of Most Persistence: An Evolutionary Perspective on Path Dependence and Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Studies, 32: 365–382.
22.
WijenF.AnsariS.2006. Overcoming Inaction Through Collective Institutional Entrepreneurship: Insights from Regime Theory. Organization Studies, 28: 1079–1100.