In this article we investigate the role of technology and meaning in the institutional work of newsmakers. By analysing ethnographic data from an Italian business newspaper undertaking a project integrating the print and online newsrooms, we show how technology makes certain actions possible – and even proposes action – for the journalists, in their enactment of the institution of business news. Drawing on Callon’s notion of agencement and Battilana and D’Aunno’s conceptualization of human agency in institutional work, our analysis shows that action is taken in the interaction between humans and non-humans, and changes in technology might trigger institutional work. The institutional work of journalists is performed by means of both old and new technologies; if new technologies trigger institutional work by proposing new actions that need to be made meaningful by the journalists, old technology functions as a ‘law book’, where the institution of business news is inscribed. The journalists then use this ‘law book’ to interpret the new actions.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (2001). Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE Publication.
2.
BarleyS. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78–108.
3.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93–117.
4.
BattilanaJ.D’AunnoT. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.
6.
BoczkowskiP. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BurawoyM. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.
10.
CallonM. (2008). Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: From prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In PinchT.KorayR. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world: Economic sociology meets science and technology studies (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
CallonM.CaliskanK. (2005). New and old directions in the anthropology of markets. Paper presented at the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
12.
CallonM.LawJ. (2005). On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Society and Space, 23, 717–733.
13.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
14.
ClemensE. S.CookJ. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466.
15.
CzarniawskaB. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CzarniawskaB. (2003). Social constructionism and organization studies. In WestwoodR.CleggS. (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 114–139). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
17.
CzarniawskaB. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London: SAGE Publications.
18.
CzarniawskaB. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles; London: SAGE Publications.
19.
de CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. P. (1983/1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
21.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 352–368). London: SAGE Publications.
23.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.
24.
GergenK. J.ThatchenkeryT. J. (1996). Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 356–377.
25.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
26.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
27.
GrafströmM. (2006). The development of Swedish business journalism: Historical roots of an organizational field. Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.
28.
HardyC.MaguireS. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
29.
HargadonA. B.DouglasY. (2001) When innovation meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.
30.
HolmP. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.
31.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, effects, and Institutionalism. In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. P. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp.143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
JoergesB.CzarniawskaB. (1998). The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies, 19, 363–385.
33.
KjaerP.SlaattaT. (Eds.) (2007). Mediating business: The expansion of business journalism. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
34.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How scientists make sense. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
35.
KraatzM. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp.59–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KundaG. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
37.
KärremanD.AlvessonM. (2001). Making newsmakers: Conversational identity at work. Organization Studies, 22, 59–89.
38.
LatourB. (1991). We have never been modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
39.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies, 2nd edition (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE Publications.
41.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
43.
LuckmannT. (2006). Die kommunikative Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. In TänzlerD.KnoblauchH.SoeffnerH.-G. (Eds.), Neue Perspektiven der Wissenssoziologie (pp. 15–26). Konstanz: UVK.
44.
MartinP.TurnerB. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 22, 141–157.
45.
MeadG. H. (1932/2002). The philosophy of the present. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
46.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
47.
MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (1983). Organizational environments. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
48.
MeyerR. E. (2008). New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles; London: SAGE Publications.
OrlikowskiW.BarleyS. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?MIS Quarterly, 25, 145–165.
51.
OrlikowskiW.ScottS. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 433–472.
52.
PallasJ.StrannegårdL. (Eds.) (2010). Företag och medier. Copenhagen: Libris.
53.
PickeringA. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 559–589.
54.
PinchT. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37, 461–483.
55.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Los Angeles; London: SAGE Publications.
56.
RaviolaE. (2010). Paper meets Web: How the institution of news production works on paper and online. Jönköping: Jönköping University.
57.
SchatzkiT. R.Knorr CetinaK.Von SavignyE. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
58.
SchwartzmanH. B. (1993). Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
59.
SeoM. G.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
60.
SilvermanD. (2005). Doing qualitative research (second edition). London: SAGE Publications.
61.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
62.
StreeckW.ThelenK. (2005). Institutional change in advanced political economies. Draft version of what later became an introductory book chapter. In StreeckW.ThelenK. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 22–39.
64.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: SAGE Publications.
65.
TuchmanG. (1973). Making news by doing work: Routinizing the unexpected. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 110–132.
66.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
67.
TunstallJ. (1971). Journalists at work: Specialist correspondents, their news organizations, news sources, and competitor-colleagues. London: Constable.
68.
TurnerB. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organizing the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225–247.
69.
WashingtonM.BoalK. B.DavisJ. N. (2008). Institutional leadership: Past, present and future. InGreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 721–735). London: SAGE Publications.
70.
WhitleyR. (1972). Black boxism and the sociology of science. Sociological Review Monograph, 18, 61–92.
71.
ZilberT. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes and thinking. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151–169). London: SAGE Publications.
72.
ZilberT. B. (2009). Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 205–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
