Our nested case study shows how a China-based focal subsidiary of a Japanese MNC used various power bases to orchestrate a co-opetitive and diverse supplier ecosystem, and to drive cumulative cycles of collaborative capability development involving successive phases of capability gap articulation, evolution and institutionalization. All phases of capability development required the crossing of cognitive boundaries, which was facilitated by mutual engagement with boundary objects, and by common possession of generic background knowledge disseminated by the focal firm. The capability evolution phase also required the crossing of social and governance boundaries, which was supported and legitimized by shared framing assumptions about mutual benefit and continuous development, while the capability institutionalization phase also required the crossing of governance boundaries. Although the focal firm was open to suggestions for mutual benefit, it exercised unilateral control over design decisions, thereby pressurizing its suppliers to engage in capability development to meet specifications that they found arduous. Supplier diversity was a resource, and co-opetition a driving force for the discovery of solutions to manufacturability problems during the capability evolution phase, such that failure to develop requisite capabilities was uncommon.
ArgyresN.MayerK. (2007). Contractual design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1060–1077.
3.
AshkenasR.UlrichD.JickT.KerrS. (1995). The boundaryless organization: breaking the chains of organizational structure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AugierM.TeeceD. (2008). Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies, 29, 1187–1208.
5.
BartlettC.GhoshalS. (1989). Managing across borders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6.
BechkyB. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14, 312–330.
7.
BinghamC.EisenhardtK.FurrN. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 27–47.
8.
BirkinshawJ. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207–230.
9.
BirkinshawJ.HoodN. (1998). Multinational subsidiary development: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23, 773–796.
10.
BolandR.TenkasiR. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6, 350–372.
11.
BouquetC.BirkinshawJ. (2008). Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34, 477–508.
12.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BrownJ.DuguidP. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.
14.
BrownJ.DuguidP. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198–213.
15.
CarlileP. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.
16.
CarlileP. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555–568.
17.
CarlileP.RebentischE. (2003). In the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49, 1180–1195.
18.
CohendetP.LlerenaP. (2003). Routines and incentives: The role of communities in the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 271–297.
19.
CollinsonD.WilsonD. (2006). Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate. Organization Studies, 27, 1359–1387.
20.
CoffR. (2010). The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 711–733.
21.
CrossanM.LaneH.WhiteR. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522–537.
22.
DarrA.TalmudI. (2003). The structure of knowledge and seller-buyer networks in markets for emergent technologies. Organization Studies, 24, 443–461.
23.
DosiG.FailloM.MarengoL. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: An introduction. Organization Studies, 29, 1165–1185.
24.
DosiG.NelsonR.WinterS. (2000). Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. In DosiG.NelsonR.WinterS. (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp.1–22). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
DoughertyD. (1992). A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13, Special Issue, 77–92.
26.
DozY.HamelG. (1998). Alliance advantage: the art of creating value through partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
27.
DyerJ. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 271–291.
28.
DyerJ. (2000). Collaborative advantage: winning through extended enterprise supplier networks. New York: Oxford University Press:
29.
DyerJ.ChoD.ChuW. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: The next ‘best practice’ in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40, 57–77.
30.
DyerJ.HatchN. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 701–719.
31.
DyerJ.NobeokaK. (2000). Creating and managing a high performance knowledge sharing network. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345–367.
32.
DyerJ.SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
33.
EdmondsonA.McManusS. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1155–1179.
34.
EisenbergE. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.
35.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
36.
EisenhardtK.GraebnerM. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
37.
EisenhardtK.MartinJ. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.
38.
EllisN.YbemaS. (2010). Marketing identities: Shifting circles of identification in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 31, 279–305.
39.
FeldmanM. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11, 611–629.
40.
FelinT.FossN. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3, 441–455.
41.
FiolM. (1994). Consensus, diversity and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5, 403–421.
42.
FossN.PedersenT. (2004). Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 340–349.
43.
FossN.LorenzenM. (2009). Towards an understanding of cognitive coordination: Theoretical developments and empirical illustrations. Organization Studies, 30, 1201–1226.
44.
FujimotoT. (2000). Evolution of manufacturing systems and ex post dynamic capabilities: A case of Toyota’s assembly operations. In DosiG.NelsonR.WinterS. (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 244–280). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
GavettiG. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the micro-foundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599–617.
46.
GibsonC. B.BirkinshawJ. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.
47.
HagenJ.ChoeS. (1998). Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review, 23, 589–600.
48.
HargadonA.BechkyB. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484–500.
49.
HarriganK. (1984). Formulating vertical integration strategies. Academy of Management Review, 9, 638–652.
50.
HeimeriksK.DuysterG. (2007). Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 25–49.
51.
HeimeriksK.DuysterG.VanhaverbekeW. (2007). Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios. Strategic Organization, 5, 373–408.
52.
HelfatC. (2000). Introduction to the special issue. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 955–959.
53.
HelfatC.RaubitschekR. (2000). Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 961–979.
54.
HibbertP.HuxhamC. (2010). The past in play: Tradition in the structures of collaboration. Organization Studies, 31, 525–554.
55.
HolbrookD.CohenW.HounshellD.KepperS. (2000). The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1017–1041.
56.
HoopesD.PostrelS. (1999). Shared knowledge, ‘glitches’, and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 837–865.
57.
HongJ.Easterby-SmithM.SnellR. (2006). Transferring organizational learning systems to Japanese subsidiaries in China. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1027–1058.
58.
HongJ.SnellR.Easterby-SmithM. (2009). Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC. International Business Review, 18, 539–554.
59.
HuygensM.van den BoschF.VolberdaH.Baden-FullerC. (2001). Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: Investigating the music industry, 1897–1997. Organization Studies, 22, 971–1011.
60.
JanisI. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company
61.
JensenP.PedersenT. (2011). The economic geography of offshoring: The fit between activities and local context. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 352–372.
62.
KaleP.SinghH. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance process. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 981–1000.
63.
KaleP.DyerJ.SinghH. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 747–768.
64.
KarimS.MitchellW. (2000). Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1061–1081.
65.
KennedyM.FissP. (2009). Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decision among U.S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 897–918.
66.
KingA.RanftA. (2001). Capturing knowledge and knowing through improvisation: What managers can learn from the thoracic surgery board certification process. Journal of Management, 27, 255–277.
67.
KostovaT. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 308–324.
68.
LakshmanC.ParenteR. (2008). Supplier-focused knowledge management in the automobile industry and its implication for product performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 317–342.
69.
LaamanenT.WallinJ. (2009). Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 950–981.
70.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LazzariniS.ClaroD.MesquitaL. (2008). Buyer-supplier and supplier-supplier alliances: Do they reinforce or undermine each other?Journal of Management Studies, 45, 561–584.
73.
LeeJ. (1992). Quantitative versus qualitative research methods: Two approaches to organization studies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 9, 87–94.
74.
LevinthalD.RerupC. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17, 502–513.
75.
LubatkinM.ForinJ.LaneP. (2001). Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations, 54, 1353–1382.
76.
LuiS. (2009). The roles of competence trust, formal contract, and time horizon in interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 30, 333–353.
77.
MakhijaM.GaneshU. (1997). The relationship between control and partner learning in learning related joint ventures. Organization Science, 8, 326–339.
78.
MarchJ. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
79.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn.London: SAGE Publications.
80.
MudambiR.NavarraP. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 385–406.
81.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
82.
NalebuffB.BrandenburgerA. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Broadway Business.
83.
NelsonR.WinterS. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
NonakaI.KonoN. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.
85.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
OrlikowskiW. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249–273.
88.
OsterlundC.CarlileP. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Information Society, 21, 91–107.
89.
PentlandB.RueterH. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.
90.
PurvisR.SambamurthyV.ZmudR. (2001). Assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations. Organization Science, 12, 117–135.
91.
RaffD. (2000). Superstores and the evolution of firm capabilities in American bookselling. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1043–1059.
92.
SakoM. (2004). Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: Comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 281–308.
93.
SantosF.EisenhardtK. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16, 491–508.
94.
ScarbroughH.SwanJ.LaurentS.BresnenM.EdemanL.NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25, 1579–1600.
95.
SchreyoggG.Kliesch-EberlM. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 913–933.
96.
SealeC. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications.
97.
SimoninB. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–623.
98.
SoleD.EdmondsonA. (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13, S17–34.
99.
StakeR. (2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
100.
StarS.GriesemerJ. (1989). Translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
101.
SturdyA.ClarkT.FinchamR.HandleyK. (2009). Between innovation and legitimization: Boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy. Organization, 16, 627–653.
102.
SwanJ.BresnenM.NewellS.RobertsonM. (2007). The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60, 1809–1837.
103.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
ThompsonM.WalshamG. (2004). Placing knowledge management in context. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 725–726.
106.
TripsasM.GavettiG. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–1161.
107.
TsaiW. (2002). Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13, 179–190.
108.
VergneJ.DurandR. (2011). The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependence and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies, 32, 365–382.
109.
WeickK. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 14–19.
110.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111.
WhitleyR. (2003). The institutional restructuring of organizational capabilities: The role of authority sharing and organizational careers. Organization Studies, 24, 667–695.
112.
WilheimM.KohlbacherF. (2011). Co-opetition and knowledge co-creation in Japanese supplier networks. Asian Business and Management, 10, 66–86.
113.
WilkesmannU.MaximilianeE.VirgilltoA. (2009). The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: Structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in social dilemma situation. Organization Studies, 30, 1141–1164.
114.
WinterS. (2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 981–996.
115.
YeungH. (1995). Qualitative personal interviews in international business research: Some lessons from a study of Hong Kong transnational corporations. International Business Review, 4, 313–339.
116.
YinR. (1989). Case study research: design and methods. 2nd edn.Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
117.
ZolloM.WinterS. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351.
