Existing literature on employee selection contains an abundance of knowledge of how selection should take place but almost nothing about how it occurs in practice. This paper presents an ethnomethodological-discourse analytical real-time study of how selection decisions are made in situ. The main findings suggest that selection decision making is characterized by ongoing practical deliberation involving four interrelated discursive processes: assembling versions of the candidates; establishing the versions of the candidates as factual; reaching selection decisions; and using selection tools as sensemaking devices. In addition, this paper identifies two basic forms of selection decision making: one characterized by initial agreement and one characterized by initial disagreement. In each basic form of decision making, selectors reason through the four discursive processes in a methodical, situated and practical manner in order to construct local versions of the candidates and make ‘reasonable’ selection decisions.
AlbyF.ZucchermaglioC. (2006). ‘Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it’: How situated work practices shape group decision making. Organization Studies, 27, 943–966.
2.
AnastasiA.UrbinaS. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
AndersonN. (1992). Eight decades of employment interview research: A retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2, 1–32.
4.
AndersonN.HerriotP.HodgkinsonG. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391–411.
5.
AtkinsonP. (1988). Ethnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 441–465.
6.
AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BarberA. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
8.
BilligM. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BilligM. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543–558.
10.
BittnerE. (1967). The police on skid-row: A study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699–715.
11.
BodenD. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
12.
CicourelA. (1974). Police practices and official records. In TurnerR. (Ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings (pp. 85–95). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
13.
CollinsonD. L.KnightsD.CollinsonM. (1990). Managing to discriminate. London: Routledge.
14.
ComptonR.MorrisseyW.NankervisA. (2009). Effective recruitment and selection practices. Sydney: CCH Australia.
15.
de WolffC. (1993). The prediction paradigm. In SchulerH.FarrJ. L.SmithM. (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 253–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
DipboyeR. (1997). Structured selection interviews: Why do they work? Why are they underutilized? In AndersonN.HerriotP. (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 455–473). Chichester: Wiley.
17.
EdwardsD. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE Publications.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
20.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
GatewoodR. D.FeildH. S.BarrickM. (2010). Human resource selection. Mason, OH: South-Western.
22.
GephartR. P. (1978). Status degradation and organizational succession: An ethnomethodological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 553–581.
23.
GephartR. P. (1993). The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1465–1514.
24.
GephartR. P.TopalC.ZhangZ. (2010). Future-oriented sensemaking: Temporalities and institutional legitimation. In HernesT.MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 275–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
GravesL.KarrenR. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313–340.
26.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 487–508). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
27.
HepburnA.PotterJ. (2004). Discourse analytic practice. In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ. F.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 180–196). London: SAGE Publications.
HeritageJ. (1983). Accounts in action. In GilbertG. N.AbellP. (Eds.), Accounts and action (pp. 117–131). Aldershot: Gower.
30.
HeritageJ. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
31.
HeritageJ. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In GiddensA.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224–272). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
HerriotP. (1992). Selection: The two subcultures. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2, 129–140.
33.
HerriotP. (1993). A paradigm bursting at the seams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 371–375.
34.
HerriotP.AndersonN. (1997). Selecting for change: How will personnel and selection psychology survive? In AndersonN.HerriotP. (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 1–34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35.
HerriotP.RothwellC. (1981). Organizational choice and decision theory: Effects of employers’ literature and selection interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 17–31.
36.
HerriotP.WingroveJ. (1984). Decision processes in graduate pre-selection. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 269–275.
37.
HighhouseS. (1997). Understanding and improving job-finalist choice: The relevance of behavioral decision research. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 449–470.
38.
HighhouseS.BottrillK. (1995). The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 220–229.
39.
HollwayW. (1984). Fitting work: Psychological assessment in organizations. In HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC.WalkerdineV. (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 26–59). London: Routledge.
40.
HollwayW. (1991). Work psychology and organizational behaviour: Managing the individual at work. London: SAGE Publications.
41.
HoughL.OswaldF. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future, remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631–664.
42.
HuismanM. (2001). Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 69–90.
43.
IlesP. (1999). Managing staff selection and assessment. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
44.
IlesP.SalamanG. (1995). Recruitment, selection and assessment. In StoreyJ. (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (pp. 203–233). London: Routledge.
45.
JørgensenM.PhillipsL. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications.
46.
Kristof-BrownA. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671.
47.
LeggeK. (1995). Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
48.
LeggeK. (1999). Representing people at work. Organization, 6, 247–264.
49.
LeiterK. (1974). Adhocing in the schools: A study of placement practices in the kindergartens of two schools. In CicourelA. (Ed.), Language use and school performance (pp. 17–75). New York, NY: Academic Press.
50.
LeiterK. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
LlewellynN.HindmarshJ. (Eds.) (2010). Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
LlewellynN.SpenceL. (2009). Practice as members’ phenomenon. Organization Studies, 30, 1419–1439.
53.
LockyerC.ScholariosD. (2004). Selecting hotel staff: Why best practice does not always work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 16, 125–135.
54.
MaynardD.ClaymanS. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.
55.
McCourtW. (1999). Paradigms and their development: The psychometric paradigm of personnel selection as a case study of paradigm diversity and consensus. Organization Studies, 20, 1011–1033.
56.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE Publications.
57.
PotterJ. (2004). Discourse analysis. In HardyM.BrymanA. (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London: SAGE Publications.
58.
PotterJ. (2011). Discursive psychology and the study of naturally occurring talk. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method and practice (pp. 187–207). London: SAGE Publications.
59.
PotterJ.EdwardsD. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In RobinsonW. P.GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103–118). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
60.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–294). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
61.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2010). A kind of governance: Rules, time and psychology in organizations. In LlewellynN.HindmarshJ. (Eds.), Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 49–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: SAGE Publications.
63.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1994). Analyzing discourse. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66). London: Routledge.
64.
RamsayH.ScholariosD. (1999). Selective decisions: Challenging orthodox analyses of the hiring process. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 63–69.
65.
RawlsA. (2008). Harold Garfinkel, ethnomethodology and workplace studies. Organization Studies, 29, 701–732.
66.
RyanA. M.TippinsN. (2004). Attracting and selecting: What psychological research tells us. Human Resource Management, 43, 305–318.
67.
RynesS.ColbertA.BrownK. (2002). HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41, 149–174.
68.
SackettP.LievensF. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419–450.
69.
SalamanG.ThompsonK. (1978). Class culture and the persistence of an elite: The case of army officer selection. Sociological Review, 26, 283–304.
70.
Samra-FredericksD.Bargiela-ChiappiniF. (2008). Introduction to the symposium on the foundations of organizing: The contribution from Garfinkel, Goffman and Sacks. Organization Studies, 29, 653–675.
71.
SandbergJ. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 9–25.
72.
SandbergJ.TsoukasH. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36, 338–360.
SchmidtF.HunterJ. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
75.
SchulerH. (1993). Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In SchulerH.FarrJ. L.SmithM. (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 11–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
SearsD. (2003). Successful talent strategies: Achieving superior business results through market-focused staffing. New York, NY: Amacom.
77.
SilvermanD. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data: A guide to the principles of qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications.
78.
SilvermanD.JonesJ. (1976). Organizational work: The language of grading, the grading of language. London: Collier Macmillan.
79.
SlaughterJ.BaggerJ.LiA. (2006). Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 47–59.
80.
SlaughterJ.SinarE.HighhouseS. (1999). Decoy effects and attribute-level inferences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 823–828.
81.
SteyaertC.JanssensM. (1999). Human and inhuman resource management: Saving the subject of HRM. Organization, 6, 181–198.
82.
SuchmanL. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
TownleyB. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.
85.
TownleyB. (1994). Reframing human resource management: Power, ethics and the subject at work. London: SAGE Publications.
86.
VennC. (1984). The subject of psychology. In HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC.WalkerdineV. (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 119–152). London: Routledge.
87.
WatsonT. (2004). HRM and critical social science analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 447–467.
88.
WatsonT. (2010). Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 915–931.
89.
WetherellM. (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
90.
WetherellM.PotterP. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
91.
WiederD. L. (1970). On meaning by rule. In DouglasJ. D. (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 107–135). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
92.
WiederD. L. (1974). Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton.
93.
WoodL. A.KrogerR. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
94.
WooffittR. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
95.
ZimmermanD. (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In DouglasJ. D. (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 221–238). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
96.
ZysbergL.NevoB. (2004). ‘The smarts that counts?’ Psychologists’ decision-making in personnel selection. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 117–124.
