AgleB. R.DonaldsonT.FreemanE.JensenM.MitchellR. K.WoodD. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 153–190.
2.
AgleB. R.MitchellR. K.SonnenfeldJ.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.
3.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
4.
ClarksonM. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review20, 92–117.
5.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
6.
FreemanR. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421.
7.
GallieW. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Meeting of the Aristotelian Society at 21, Bedford Square, London, W.C.1, on March 12, 1956 at 7:30 p.m.
8.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
LaplumeA. O.SonparK.LitzR. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34, 1152–1189.
10.
MichenerJ. A. (1978). Chesapeake. New York: Random House.
11.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
