This paper explores both the concrete and symbolic aspects of how ISO 9000 certification audits are prepared for and passed. Based on interviews with 60 respondents employed in certified organizations, this study analyzes the process of preparing for and passing an ISO certification audit through the lens of the degree-purchasing syndrome (DPS) in education, which refers to the disconnect between the acquisition of academic degrees and the learning process they should entail. This perspective makes it possible to go beyond the neo-institutional approach to shed light on the scholastic, ethical and contradictory aspects of the ISO certification process, which remain largely unexplored in the literature. The findings debunk the rhetoric of impartiality, objectivity and rigor surrounding the ISO certification process. They also reveal the tendency to acquire ISO certification as a sort of “organizational degree” after passing a quite predictable exam, with all the pitfalls that entails, such as rote preparation, procrastination, short-term focus and cheating.
AwanH. M.BhattiM. I. (2003). An evaluation of ISO 9000 registration practices: A case study of sports goods industry. Managerial Finance, 29, 109–134.
2.
BeckN.WalgenbachP. (2005). Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? The adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry. Organization Studies, 26, 841–866.
3.
BeckmerhagenI. A.BergH. P.KarapetrovicS. V.WillbornW. O. (2004). On the effectiveness of quality management system audits. TQM Magazine, 16, 14–25.
4.
BoiralO. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14, 720–737.
5.
BoiralO. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth?Organization Science, 18, 127–146.
6.
BoiralO. (2011). Managing with ISO systems: Lessons from practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 197–220.
7.
BoiralO.GendronY. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 331–347.
8.
BrotheridgeC. M.LeeR. T. (2005). Correlates and consequences of degree purchasing among Canadian university students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35, 71–97.
9.
BrunssonN. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talks, decisions and actions in organizations. New York: Wiley.
10.
BrunssonN.JacobssonB. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Business Improvement Network (2002). Reactions to ISO Secretary-General’s ‘police yourselves’ call to ISO 9000 community. ISO Management Systems, March–April, 55–61.
12.
ChanW.HaoL.SuenW. (2007). A signaling theory of grade inflation. International Economic Review, 48, 1065–1090.
13.
ChristmannP.TaylorG. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–878.
14.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
15.
DurandR.McGuireJ. (2005) Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26, 165–196.
16.
EicherL. D. (2001). Opening speech of the 17th Meeting. International Organization for Standardization Council Committee on Conformity Assessment (ISO/CASCO), Geneva.
17.
GendronY.SuddabyR.LamH. (2006). An examination of the ethical commitment of professional accountants to auditor independence. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 169–193.
18.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings in the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 107–120.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
20.
Heras-SaizarbitoriaI. (2011). Internalization of ISO 9000: An exploratory study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111, 1214–1237.
21.
International Organization for Standardization (2002). Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing. Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat.
22.
International Organization for Standardization (2006). 17021:2006 Conformity assessment: Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat.
23.
International Organization for Standardization (2009). The ISO Survey 2009. Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat.
24.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
MartinR. D. (2007). Through the ethics looking glass: Another view of the world of auditors and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 5–14.
26.
MazzaC.Sahlin-AnderssonK.PedersenJ. S. (2005). European constructions of an American model. Management Learning, 36, 471–491.
27.
McMillanJ. J.CheneyG. (1996). The student as consumer: Implications and limitations of a metaphor. Communication Education, 45, 1–15.
28.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
29.
MooreD. A.TetlockP. E.TanluL.BazermanM. H. (2006). Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31, 1–20.
30.
MouritsenJ.ErnstJ.JorgensenA. M. (2000). Green certification as a managerial technology. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16, 167–187.
31.
MurdockT. B.MillerA.KohlhardtJ. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
32.
NiZ.KarapetrovicS. (2003). Perennial self-audit: Model and applications. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 363–373.
33.
PatersonF. (2002). The auditor’s tale: Conformity assessment as seen by a practitioner. ISO Management Systems, July–August, 47–52.
34.
PowerM. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 289–315.
35.
PowerM. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
PowerM. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 379–394.
37.
PrakashA.PotoskiM. (2007). Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: A club theory perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 35, 773–792.
38.
RenkeW. N. (2000). Commercialization and resistance: Commercial takeover of secondary education. In TurkJ. L. (Ed.), The corporate campus: Commercialization and the dangers to Canada’s colleges and universities (pp. 31–50). Toronto: James Lorimer & Co.
39.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
40.
RynesS. L.BretzR. D.Jr.GerhartB. A. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487–521.
SpenceM. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92, 434–459.
43.
Standards Council of Canada (2000). Management systems standards: The story so far. Ottawa: Standards Council of Canada.
44.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
45.
TownleyB. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 163–179.
46.
WalgenbachP. (2001). The production of distrust by means of producing trust. Organization Studies, 22, 693–714.
47.
WalgenbachP. (2007). Façade and means of control: The use of ISO 9000 standards. In TheuvsenL.SpillerA.PeupertM.JahnG. (Eds), Quality management in food chains (pp. 29–43). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
