This paper explores the relationship between masculinity, the body and the military through a close reading of the film Jarhead. Drawing on a Foucauldian frame of analysis, we consider three performances of the masculine military body that form key aspects of the film’s representational economy: the disciplined body, an outcome of the processes of basic training; the gendered body, realized through deployment of metaphors of the feminine to strengthen the masculine conception of the military body; and the cyborgian body, the result of the man-machine interface which is rapidly developing in many militaries around the world, and which poses significant questions for performances of military masculinity. We conclude by suggesting that the film’s rendering of the material and discursive body reveals an unexpected tension between the expectations of military bodies and the lived experience of their labour. As well as augmenting empirical explorations of male-worker-bodies and analysing the occupation of soldier as requiring a unique kind of body work, our contribution to the body-organization literature turns upon the claim that docile military bodies are made fit for purpose, but may actually no longer have a purpose for which to be fit.
ArmitageJ. (2003). Militarized bodies: an introduction. Body and Society, 9, 1–12.
2.
BarrettF. (2001). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US navy. In WhiteheadS.BarrettF. (Eds), The masculinities reader (pp. 77–99). Cambridge: Polity.
3.
BaxterL.HughesC. (2004). Tongue sandwiches and bagel days: Sex, food and mind-body dualism. Gender, Work and Organization, 11, 363–380.
4.
BellE. (2008) Reading management and organizations in film. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
5.
BennettC. (2000). Equal opportunities strategies: Ways of developing feminist embodiment as a physical reality in bureaucracies? In McKieL.WatsonN. (Eds), Organizing bodies: Policy, institutions and work (pp. 185–203). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BowringM. (2009). Leading at the border: Gender, sex and sexuality in hypergendered organizations. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leicester.
7.
BrewisJ. (1998). What is wrong with this picture? Sex and gender relations in Disclosure. In HassardJ.HollidayR. (Eds), Organization representation: Work and organizations in popular culture (pp. 83–99). London: SAGE.
8.
BrewisJ.LinsteadS. (2000). Sex, work and sex work: Eroticizing organization. London: Routledge.
9.
BurkeK. (1984). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose, 3rd edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
10.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York, London: Routledge.
11.
CacchioniT.WolkowitzC. (2011). Treating women’s sexual difficulties: The body work of sexual therapy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33, 266–279.
12.
CarverT. (2007). GI Jane: What are the ‘manners’ that ‘maketh a man’?British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 313–317.
13.
CleggS.HardyC. (1996). Representations. In CleggS.HardyC.NordW. (Eds), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 676–708). London: SAGE.
14.
DaviesB.BrowneJ.GannonS.HonanE.SomervilleM. (2005). Embodied women at work in neoliberal times and places. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 343–362.
15.
DyerS.McDowellL.BatznitskyA. (2010). The impact of migration on the gendering of service work: The case of a West London hotel. Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 635–657.
16.
EllisN. (2008). ‘What the hell is that?’: Representations of professional services markets in The Simpsons. Organization, 15, 705–723.
17.
FoucaultM. (1976). The history of sexuality, volume I. London: Penguin.
18.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
19.
FoucaultM. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (Eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53–72). Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20.
GatrellC. (2011). Policy and the pregnant body at work: Strategies of secrecy, silence and supra-performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 158–181.
21.
GimlinD. (2007). What is ‘body work’? A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 1, 353–370.
22.
GodfreyR. (2009). Military, masculinity and mediated representations: (Con)fusing the real and the reel. Culture and Organization, 17, 203–220.
23.
GodfreyR.LilleyS. (2009). Visual consumption, collective memory, and the representation of war. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 12, 275–300.
24.
Hables GrayC. (1997). Postmodern war: The new politics of conflict. London: Routledge.
25.
Hables GrayC. (2002). Cyborg citizen. New York: Routledge.
26.
HallA.HockeyJ.RobinsonV. (2007). Occupational cultures and the embodiment of masculinity: Hairdressing, estate agency and firefighting. Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 534–551.
27.
HancockP.TylerM. (2007). Un/doing gender and the aesthetics of organizational performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 512–533.
28.
HarawayD. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
29.
HassardJ.HollidayR. (Eds) (1998). Organization/representation: Work and organizations in popular culture. London: SAGE.
30.
HaynesK. (2008). Re(figuring) accounting and maternal bodies: The gendered embodiment of accounting professionals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 328–348.
31.
HaynesK. (2011). Body beautiful? Gender, identity and the body in professional services firms. Gender, Work and Organization, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00583.x10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00583.x.
32.
HennesseyP. (2009). The junior officers’ reading club: Killing time and fighting wars. London: Penguin.
33.
HöpflH. (2003). Becoming a (virile) member: Women and the military body. Body and Society, 9, 13–30.
34.
JeffordsS. (1989). The remasculinization of America: Gender and the Vietnam War. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35.
JonesA. (2006). Straight as a rule: Heteronormativity, gendercide, and the noncombatant male. Men and Masculinities, 4, 451–469.
36.
KnightsD.WillmottH. (1999). Management lives: Power and identity in work organizations. London: SAGE.
37.
KongT. (2006). What it feels like for a whore: The body politics of women performing erotic labour in Hong Kong. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 409–434.
38.
KovitzM. (2003). The roots of military masculinity. In HigateR. (Ed.), Military masculinities: Identities and the state. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
39.
LanP.C. (2001). The body as a contested terrain for labor control: Cosmetics retailers in department stores and direct selling. In BaldozR.KoeberC.KraftP. (Eds), The critical study of work: labor, technology, and global production (pp. 83–105). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
MarsdenR. (1998). A political technology of the body: How labour is organized into a productive force. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9, 99–136.
41.
MavinS.GrandyG. (2011). Doing gender well and differently in dirty work: The case of exotic dancing. Gender, Work and Organization, DOI 10.111/j.1468-0432.2011.00567.x10.111/j.1468-0432.2011.00567.x
42.
McDowellL.CourtG. (1994). Performing work: Bodily representations in merchant banks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12, 727–750.
43.
MertonR.K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18, 560–568.
44.
MonaghanL. (2002). Embodying gender, work and organization: Solidarity, cool loyalties and contested hierarchy in a masculinist occupation. Gender, Work and Organization, 9, 504–536.
45.
MorganD. (1994). Theater of war: Combat, the military, and masculinities. In BrodH.KaufmanM. (Eds), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 165–182). London: SAGE.
46.
MuhrS. (2011). Caught in the gendered machine: On the masculine and feminine in cyborg leadership. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 337–357.
47.
OertonS. (2004). Bodywork boundaries: Power, politics and professionalism in therapeutic massage. Gender, Work and Organization, 11, 544–565.
48.
ParkerM. (2000). Manufacturing bodies: Flesh, organization, cyborgs. In HassardJ.HollidayR.WillmottH. (Eds.), Body and organization (pp. 71–86). London: SAGE.
49.
ParkerM. (2009a). Pirates, merchants and anarchists: Representations of international business. Management and Organizational History, 4, 167–185.
50.
ParkerM. (2009b). Tony Soprano on management: Culture and economy in fact and fiction. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2, 379–392.
51.
ParkerM. (2011). The Wild West, the industrial East, and the outlaw. Culture and Organization, 17, 347–365.
52.
ParkerM.CooperR. (1998). Cyborganization: Cinema as nervous system. In HassardJ.HollidayR. (Eds), Organization/ representation: work and organizations in popular culture (pp. 201–228). London: SAGE.
53.
PettingerL. (2005). Gendered work meets gendered goods: Selling and service in clothing retail. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 460–478.
54.
PhillipsM.KnowlesD. (2010) Performance and performativity: Undoing fictions of women business owners. Gender, Work and Organization, DOI: 10.111/j.1468-0432.2010.00528.x10.111/j.1468-0432.2010.00528.x
55.
PhillipsN. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625–649.
56.
RehnA. (2008). Pop (culture) goes the organization: On highbrow, lowbrow and hybrids in studying popular culture within organization studies. Organization, 15, 765–783.
57.
RhodesC. (2002). Coffee and the business of pleasure: The case of Harbucks vs. Mr. Tweek. Culture and Organization, 8, 293–306.
58.
RhodesC. (2007). Outside the gates of Eden: Work and utopia in rock music. Group and Organization Management, 32, 22–49.
59.
RhodesC.ParkerM. (2008). Images of organizing in popular culture. Organization, 15, 627–637.
60.
SaltmanK. (2003). The strong arm of the law. Body and Society, 9, 49–67.
61.
SandersT. (2005). ‘It’s just acting’: Sex workers’ strategies for capitalizing on sexuality. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 319–342.
62.
SchiltK.ConnellC. (2007). Do workplace transitions make gender trouble?Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 596–618.
63.
SchneiderJ. (1997). The pleasure of the uniform. Germanic Review, 72, 183-201.
64.
SheppardD. (1989). Image and self-image of women managers. In HearnJ.SheppardD. L.Tancred-SheriffP.BurrellG. (Eds), The sexuality of organization (pp. 139–157). London: SAGE.
65.
ShillingC. (2003). The body and social theory. London: SAGE.
66.
SimpsonR. (2011). Men discussing women and women discussing men: Reflexivity, transformation and gendered practice in the context of nursing care. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 377–398.
67.
SinclairA. (2005). Body possibilities in leadership. Leadership, 1, 387–406
68.
StoreyJ. (2003). The articulation of memory and desire: From Vietnam to the war in the Persian Gulf. In GraingeP. (Ed.), Memory and popular film (pp. 99–119). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
TylerM.AbbottP. (1998). Chocs away: Weight watching in the contemporary airline industry. Sociology, 32, 433–450.
71.
TwiggJ.WolkowitzC.CohenR. L.NettletonS. (2011) Conceptualising body work in health and social care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33, 171–188.
72.
Van Den BrinkM.StobbeL. (2009). Doing gender in academic education: The paradox of visibility. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 451–470.
73.
WolkowitzC. (2010) The organizational contours of ‘body work’. In JeanesE.KnightsD.Yancey MartinP. (Eds), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organizations. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
