This paper contextualizes before summarizing a conceptual framework for virtue ethics in organizations that has been developed by drawing upon the work of the moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre. Conducting empirical work with this framework is at an embryonic stage and so, having discussed methodological issues, the paper reports on findings from a longitudinal case study-based research project into the private equity-owned organization Alliance Boots. It demonstrates the applicability of the conceptual approach and hence the presence of practices and virtues even within capitalist business organizations. It makes theoretical advances particularly in the relationship between internal and external goods. It proposes a mapping for virtue in organizations and uses this to conduct an organizational analysis of Alliance Boots and its predecessor organizations. The paper thus makes both theoretical and empirical contributions to our knowledge in the area of applied virtue ethics.
AchtemeierP. M. (1994). The truth of tradition: Critical Realism in the thought of Alasdair MacIntyre and T. F. Torrance. Scottish Journal of Theology, 47(3), 355–374.
BeadleR. (2002). The misappropriation of MacIntyre. Reason in Practice, 2(2), 45–54. (The journal has been renamed Philosophy of Management.)
4.
BeadleR.KönyötD. (2006). The man in the red coat – management in the circus. Culture and Organization, 12(2), 127–137.
5.
BeadleR.MooreG. (2006). MacIntyre on virtue and organization. Organization Studies, 27(3), 323–340.
6.
BeadleR.MooreG. (2011). MacIntyre: Neo-Aristotelianism and organization theory. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 32, 85–121.
7.
BruiningH.BoselieP.WrightM.BaconN. (2005). The impact of business ownership change on employee relations: Buy-outs in the UK and the Netherlands. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(3), 345–365.
8.
CleggS.CourpassonD.PhilipsN. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.
9.
CleggS. (2010). The state, power and agency: Missing in action in Institutional Theory?Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 4–13.
10.
CoeS.BeadleR. (2008). Could we know a practice-embodying institution if we saw one?Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 9–19.
11.
CreswellJ. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CrockettC. (2005). Grounding the theory of virtue. Unpublished PhD thesis, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
13.
CrockettC. (2008). MacIntyre: From transliteration to translation. Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 45–66.
14.
CrockettC.AndersonA. (2008). A grounded theory of virtue: From purpose to praxis. Working paper.
15.
EisenhardtK.GraebnerM. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
16.
FeilzerM. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16.
17.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. (1991). Bring society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In PowellW.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
HallidayJ.JohnssonM. (2010). A MacIntyrean perspective on organizational learning. Management Learning, 41(1), 37–51.
19.
HancockP. (2008). Embodied generosity and an ethics of organization. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1357–1373.
20.
KeatR. (2000). Cultural goods and the limits of the market. London: Macmillan.
MarshallH. (2002). What do we do when we code data?Qualitative Research Journal, 2(1), 56–70.
35.
McCannD.BrownsbergerM. L. (1990). Management as a social practice: Rethinking business ethics after MacIntyre. Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics, 1990, 223–245.
36.
McCloskeyD. (1998). Bourgeois virtue and the history of P and S. Journal of Economic History, 58(2), 297–317.
37.
McCloskeyD. (2006). The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
MiettinenR.Samra-FredericksD.YanowD. (2009). Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.
39.
MooreG. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.
40.
MooreG. (2005a). Humanizing business: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.
41.
MooreG. (2005b). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.
42.
MooreG. (2008). Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.
43.
MooreG. (2009). Virtue ethics and business organizations. In SmithJ. (Ed.) Normative theory and business ethics (pp. 35–59). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
MooreG. (2011). Churches as organisations: Towards a virtue ecclesiology for today. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 11(1), 45–65.
45.
MooreG.BeadleR. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.
46.
NielsenR. (2008). The private equity-leveraged buyout form of finance capitalism: Ethical and social issues, and potential reforms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3), 379–404.
47.
NeubertM.CarlsonD.KacmarK. M.RobertsJ.ChonkoL. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behaviour: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157–170.
48.
PrattM. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.
49.
ProvisC. (2010). Virtuous decision making for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 3–16.
50.
RandallD.FernandesM. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 805–817.
51.
SaldanaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
52.
SayerA. (2003). (De)commodification, consumer culture, and moral economy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(3), 341–357.
53.
SayerA. (2007). Comments on MacIntyre’s concepts of practice and institution. Working paper presented at a MacIntyre Symposium, Durham UK.
54.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
55.
SisonA. (2003). The moral capital of leaders. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
56.
SisonA. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
57.
SisonA. (2011). Aristotelian citizenship and corporate citizenship: Who is a citizen of the corporate polis?Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 3–9.
58.
SolomonR. (1992). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
SolomonR. (1999). A better way to think about business: How personal integrity leads to corporate success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
SolomonR. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.
TsoukasH.CummingsS. (1997). Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies. Organization Studies, 18(4), 655–683.
63.
WeickK.SutcliffeK. (2003). Hospitals as cultures of entrapment: A re-analysis of the Bristol Royal Victoria Infirmary. California Management Review, 45(2), 73–85.
64.
WrightT.GoodsteinJ. (2007). Character is not ‘dead’ in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33(6), 928–958.
65.
YinR. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
