We use and extend resource-dependence theory by analyzing how loosely-coupled organizational structures facilitate the management of political ties by business groups in emerging economies. This topic is particularly salient because business groups are a prevalent organizational form in these countries where they face both a high dependence on governments to secure key resources and a unique set of risks associated with political ties. We identify and analyze four buffering mechanisms that enable loosely-coupled business groups to protect themselves against the adverse effects of such ties. We ground and contextualize these mechanisms by relying on a longitudinal case study of the Salim Group – a very large and well-connected Indonesian business group under the Suharto regime. This study is particularly relevant in the context of the renewed interest in the study of firms’ organizational structure.
AldrichH.HerkerD. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.
2.
BaronD. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37, 47–65.
3.
BasuO. N.DirsmithM. W.GuptaP. P. (1999). The coupling of the symbolic and the technical in an institutionalized context: The negotiated order of the GAO’s audit reporting process. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 506–526.
4.
BeattieA. (2009). False economy: A surprising economic history of the world. New York: Riverhead Books/Penguin Group.
5.
BoddewynJ. J. (2007). The internationalization of the public-affairs function in U.S. multinational enterprises: Organization and management. Business & Society, 46(2), 136–173.
6.
BoddewynJ. J.BrewerT. L. (1994). International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 119–143.
7.
CampbellJ. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
CasciaroT.PiskorskiM. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199.
9.
ChandlerA. D.Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
DastmalchianA. (1984). Environmental dependencies and company structures in Britain. Organization Studies, 5(3), 227–241.
11.
DavisG. F.CobbA. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In SchoonhovenC. B.DobbinF. (Ed.), Stanford’s Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970–2000, Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 21–42). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
12.
DavisG. F.MarquisC. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332–343.
13.
DielemanM.SachsW. M. (2008). Coevolution of institutions and corporations in emerging economies: How the Salim Group morphed into an institution of Suharto’s crony regime. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1274–1300.
14.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–551.
15.
ElsonR. E. (2001). Suharto: A political biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FaccioM. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96, 369–386.
17.
FanJ. P. H.WongT.J.ZhangT. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330–357.
18.
FennellM. L.AlexanderJ. A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456–476.
19.
FismanR. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102.
20.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
21.
GranovetterM. (2005). Business groups and social organization. In SmelserN. J.SwedbergR. (Ed.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 429–451). Princeton: Princeton.
22.
GreeningD. W.GrayB. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–498.
23.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC.R. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies, 9(3), 293–316.
24.
GreenwoodR.MillerD. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78–88.
25.
GuillénM. F. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–380.
26.
HeniszW. J.ZelnerB. A. (2003). The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organization, 1(4), 451–460.
27.
HillmanA. J.HittM. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation and strategy Decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842.
28.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.SchulerD. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 306, 837–857.
29.
HillmanA. J.WithersM. C.CollinsB. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
30.
HoskissonR. E.EdenL.LauC.M.WrightM. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.
31.
KatilaR.RosenbergerJ. D.EisenhardtK. M. (2008). Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms, and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295–332.
32.
KhannaT.YafehY. (2007). Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites?Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 331–372.
33.
KotterJ. P. (1979). Managing external dependence. Academy of Management Review4(1), 87–92.
34.
KraatzM. S.BlockE. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
LabiancaG.BrassD. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review31(3), 596–614.
36.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
37.
LeiD.HittM. H.GoldharJ. D. (1996). Advanced manufacturing technology: Organizational design and strategic flexibility. Organization Studies, 17(3), 501–523.
38.
LeuzC.Oberholzer-GeeF. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 411–439.
39.
LiS.FilerL. (2007). The effects of the governance environment on the choice of investment mode and the strategic implications. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 80–98.
40.
LiJ. J.PoppoL.ZhouK. Z. (2008). Do managerial ties always provide value in China? Competition, uncertainty and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 383–400.
41.
LuoY. (2006). Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective. Journal of International Business, 37, 747–766.
42.
MarchJ. (Ed.). (1965). Handbook of organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
43.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
44.
MeyerM. W.LuX. (2005). Managing indefinite boundaries: The strategy and structure of a Chinese business firm. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 57–86.
45.
MeznarM.NighD. (1995). Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 975–996.
46.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
47.
MilesR. E.SnowC. C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73.
48.
My pal … the billionaire. (1995). Australian Financial Review, 26September, p. 14.
49.
OliverC. (1993). Organizational boundaries: Definitions, functions, properties. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 10(1), 1–16.
50.
OliverC.HolzingerI. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496–520.
51.
OrtonJ. D.WeickK. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.
52.
PadgettJ. F.AnsellC. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319.
53.
ParkS. H.LuoY. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 455–477.
54.
PengM. W.LuoY. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 486–501.
55.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
56.
PrattM. G.ForemanP. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.
57.
ReddingG. (2008). Separating culture from institutions: The use of semantic spaces as a conceptual domain and the case of China. Management and Organization Review, 4(2), 257–289.
58.
RobisonR. (1986). Indonesia, the rise of capital. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
59.
RobisonR.HadizV. (2004). Reorganizing power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
60.
SalorioE. M.BoddewynJ.DahanN. (2005). Integrating business political behavior with economic and organizational strategies. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(2), 28–55.
61.
SatoY. (1993). The Salim Group in Indonesia: The development and behavior of the largest conglomerate in Southeast Asia. The Developing Economies, 31(4), 408–441.
62.
SantosF. M.EisenhardtK. M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 643–671.
63.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK.CramerR. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672.
64.
SchwarzA. (2004). A nation in waiting: Indonesia’s search for stability. Singapore: Talisman Publishing.
65.
ScottR. W. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
66.
SelznickP. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 995–1025.
68.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
SiegelJ. (2007). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 621–666.
70.
SkippariM. (2005). Intrafirm variation and change in the political strategies of a multidivisional firm. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(3), 82–110.
71.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
72.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.
73.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 202–228.
74.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd edn). Beverly Hills: SAGE.
75.
YiuD. W.LuY.BrutonG. W.HoskissonR. E. (2007). Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1551–1579.
