The financial crisis has raised questions about the role of corporate elites in contemporary organizations. This article follows recent work on organizational elites that argues for critical sociological approaches to the study of such elites, using, for example, Bourdieu’s concept of field, and for studies of elites in contexts outside North America. Applying Bourdieusian concepts such as forms of violence, we look at the particular case of the Scottish banking elite, focusing on changing enactments of violence within that field, from symbolic violence to economic violence. We trace the movement of the Scottish banking elite from the national-traditional to the global and modernized and demonstrate how members of an elite field can operate in the field of power within their own organization and at the same time within a transorganizational field of peer competitors, thus illustrating how a specific national elite has been affected by neoliberal globalization and its crisis.
AugarP. (2002). The death of gentlemanly capitalism. London: Penguin.
3.
BennettT.SavageM.SilvaE.WardeA.Gayo-CalM.WrightD. (2005) Cultural capital and the cultural field in Contemporary Britain. CRESC Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 3, CRESC: University of Manchester, UK.
4.
BogdanorV. (1999). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BourdieuP. (1979). La distinction: critique sociale de jugement. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
6.
BourdieuP. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
7.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1989). La noblesse d’État. Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
9.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10.
BourdieuP. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Paris: Éditions de Seuil.
11.
BourdieuP. (1996a). Foreword to Y. Dezalay & B.G. Garth, Dealing in Virtue (pp. vii–ix). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BourdieuP. (1996b). The political ontology of Martin Heidegger. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
CarrollW. K. (2009). Transnationalists and national networkers in the corporate elite. Global Networks, 9, 289–314.
26.
CleggS. R.CourpassonD.PhilipsN. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.
27.
CurrieW. L.WillocksL. (1996). The New Branch Columbus project at Royal Bank of Scotland: The implementation of large-scale business process re-engineering. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5, 213–236.
28.
CurrieW. L.WillocksL. P (1998). Analysing four types of IT sourcing decisions in the context of scale, client/supplier interdependency and risk mitigation. Information Systems Journal, 8, 119–143.
29.
DavieG. (1981). The democratic intellect: Scotland and her universities in the nienteenth century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
30.
DavieG. (2001). The Scotch metaphysics: A century of enlightenment in Scotland. London: Routledge.
DezalayY.GarthB. G. (1996). Dealing in virtue: International commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
DezalayY.GarthB. G. (2002). The internationalization of palace wars: Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
DobbinF. (1993). The social construction of the Great Depression: Industrial policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France. Theory and Society, 22, 1–56.
35.
DoganM.HigleyJ. (1998). Elites, crises, and the origins of regimes. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
36.
DomhoffG. W. (2006). Who rules America? Power and politics and social change. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
EmirbayerM.JohnsonV. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational sociology. Theory and Society, 37, 1–44.
39.
EyalG.SzélenyI.TownsleyE. (2003). Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist Central Europe. London: Verso.
40.
FinchamR. (2000). Management as magic: Reengineering and the search for business salvation. In KnightsD.WillmottH. (Eds.), The reengineering revolution: Critical studies of corporate change (pp. 174–190). London: Sage.
41.
FourcadeM. (2009). Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GolsorkhiD.LecaB.LounsburyM.RamirezC. (2009). Analysing, accounting for and unmasking domination: On our role as scholars of practice, practitioners of social science and public intellectuals. Organization 16/6, 779–797.
44.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR.S. (Eds.) (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
45.
HallS. (1988). The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the Left. London: Verso.
46.
HammerM.ChampyJ. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
47.
HanksW. F. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 67–83.
48.
HarveyC.MacleanM. (2008) Capital theory and the dynamics of elite business networks in Britain and France. Sociological Review, 56, 105–120.
49.
HearnJ. (2007). National identity: Banal, personal and embedded. Nations and Nationalism, 13, 657–674.
50.
HilgersT. (2009). Habitus, freedom, and reflexivity. Theory & Psychology, 19/6, 728–755.
KerrR.RobinsonS. (2009). The hysteresis effect as creative adaptation of the habitus: Dissent and transition to the ‘corporate’ in post-Soviet Ukraine. Organization, 16, 829–853.
56.
KiddC. (2007a). On heroes, hero-worship and demonology in Scottish historiography: A reply to Dr Ferguson. Scottish Historical Review, 86, 108–112.
57.
KiddC. (2007b). Brown v Salmond. London Review of Books, 29/8, 6–8.
LeanderA. (2008). The ‘realpolitik of reason’: Thinking international relations through fields, habitus and practice. In KlotzA.PrakashD. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide (pp. 11–27). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
LebaronF. (2008). Central bankers in the contemporary global field of power: A ‘social space’ approach. Sociological Review, 56, 121–144.
64.
LescourretM-A. (2008). Bourdieu: vers une économie du bonheur. Paris: Éditions Flammarion.
65.
LingardB.ChristieP. (2003). Leading theory: Bourdieu and the field of educational leadership. An introduction and overview to this special issue. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 66, 317–333.
66.
LiveseyJ. (2009). Civil society and empire: Ireland and Scotland in the eighteenth century Atlantic world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67.
MacleanM.HarveyC.ChiaR. (2010). Dominant corporate agents and the power elite in France and Britain. Organization Studies, 31, 327–348.
68.
MathiasP. (1969). The first industrial nation: The economic history of Britain 1700–1914. London: Methuen.
OcasioW.KimH. (1999). The circulation of corporate control: Selection of functional backgrounds of new CEOs in large US manufacturing firms, 1981–1992. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 532–562.
76.
OramM.WellinsR. S. (1995). Re-engineering’s missing ingredient. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Oxford University Press (2009). Who’s Who 2009 & Who Was Who. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Searchable databaseavailable at http://www.ukwhoswho.com/
79.
ParetoV. (1901/1991). The Rise and fall of the elites. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
80.
ReglingK.WatsonM. (2010). A preliminary report on the sources of Ireland’s banking crisis. Dublin: Government Publications.
RobbinsD. (2005). The origins, early development and status of Bourdieu’s concept of ‘cultural capital’. British Journal of Sociology, 56, 13–30.
83.
RobinsonS.KerrR. (2009). The symbolic violence of leadership: A critical hermeneutic study of leadership and succession in a British international organization in the post-Soviet context. Human Relations, 62, 877–905.
84.
RowlinsonM.TomsS.WilsonJ. (2006). Legitimacy and the capitalist corporation: Cross-cutting perspectives on ownership and control. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 681–702.
85.
SapiroG. (2004). Une liberté contrainte: la formation de la theorie de l’habitus. In PintoL.SapiroG.ChampagneP. (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu, sociologue (pp. 49–78). Paris: Layard.
86.
SavageM.WilliamsK. (2008). Elites remembered in capitalism and forgotten by social sciences. Sociological Review, 56, 1–24.
87.
SavilleR. (1996). Bank of Scotland: A history 1695–1995. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
88.
ScottJ. (2003). Transformations in the British economic elite. Comparative Sociology, 2, 155–173.
SewellW. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In BonnellV. E.HuntL. (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35–61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
91.
SklairL. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
92.
SkoczylasA. (2008). Archibald Campbell’s enquiry into the original of moral virtue, Presbyterian orthodoxy, and the Scottish Enlightenment. Scottish Historical Review, 87, 68–100.
93.
SwartzD. L. (2008). Bringing Bourdieu’s master concepts into organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37, 45–52.
94.
SweetmanP. (2003). Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus?Sociological Review, 51, 528–594.
95.
TerrayE. (2002). Réflexions sur la violence symbolique. In LokjineJ. (Ed.), Les sociologies critiques du capitalisme (pp. 11–23). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
VandenbergheF. (1999). ‘The real is relational’: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17, 32–67.
98.
WacquantL. J. D. (1993). On the tracks of symbolic power: Prefatory notes to Bourdieu’s ‘State Nobility’. Theory, Culture and Society, 10, 1–17.
99.
WacquantL. J. D. (2002). De l’idéologie à la violence symbolique: culture, classe et conscience chez Marx et Bourdieu. In LojkineJ. (Ed.), Les sociologies critiques du capitalisme (pp. 25–40). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
100.
WacquantL. J. D. (2005a). Following Pierre Bourdieu into the field. Ethnography, 5, 387–414.
101.
WacquantL. J. D. (2005b). Symbolic power in the rule of the ‘state nobility’. In WacquantL. (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu and democratic politics (pp. 133–150). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
102.
WadeR.SigurgeirsdottirS. (2010). Lessons from Iceland. New Left Review, 65, 5–28.
YooT.LeeS. H. (2009). In search of social capital in state-activist capitalism: Elite networks in France and Korea. Organization Studies, 30, 529–547.
109.
ZaldM. N.LounsburyM. (2010). The Wizards of Oz: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31, 963–996.
