The article deals with the question of how institutional continuity is realized. It presents an analysis of the continuation of the institution of pre-consultation in the Dutch construction industry over a period of nine years, after this was declared illegal as a consequence of European Union regulations. The analysis utilizes a structuration-based practice approach to institutionalization. The findings suggest that institutional continuity is a matter of a social mechanism which emerges as a consequence of the particular way in which practices are enacted, and which has the effect of repairing and/or concealing contradiction so that change is not initiated.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93–117.
2.
BeckertJ. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutional practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20, 777–799.
3.
BlacklerF. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 863–884.
4.
BlacklerF. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 1021–1046.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.
7.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198–213.
DacinM. T.GoodsteinJ.ScottW. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 45–57.
10.
DéjeanF.GondJ. P.LecaB. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57, 741–764.
11.
DiMaggioP. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In ZuckerL. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
DoughertyD. (1992). A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 77–92.
15.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
16.
ElsterJ. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
18.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 16, 611–629.
19.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.
20.
FeldmanM. S.RafaeliA. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 310–331.
21.
FligsteinN. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 397–405.
22.
FligsteinN. (2001). Social skill and theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19, 105–125.
23.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies28, 957–969.
24.
GarudR.JainS.KumaraswamyA. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196–214.
25.
GherardiS.NicoliniD. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 419–436.
26.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
27.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
28.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054.
29.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinA.SuddabyR. (2008). Introduction. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.
30.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 27–48.
31.
GrossN. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358–379.
32.
HargadonA. B.DouglasY. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.
33.
HedströmP.SwedbergR. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In HedströmP.SwedbergR. (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HensmansM. (2003). Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24, 355–381.
35.
HolmP. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 423–443.
36.
JarzabkowskiP. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25, 529–560.
37.
JarzabkowskiP. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
38.
JarzabkowskiP.SpeeA. P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 69–95.
39.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
JohnsonG.MelinL.WhittingtonR. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 3–22.
41.
KondraA. Z.HiningsC. R. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19, 743–767.
LawJ. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5, 379–393.
44.
LawrenceT. R.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–255), 2nd edition. London: Sage.
45.
LeblebiciH.SalancikG. R.CopayA.KingT. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.
46.
LounsburyM. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289–307.
47.
LounsburyM.CrumleyE. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
48.
LounsburyM.VentrescaM.HirschP. M. (2003), Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 71–104.
49.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.
50.
MahoneyJ. (2001). Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum, 16, 575–593.
51.
MayntzR. (2004). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 237–259.
52.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
53.
MunirK. A.PhillipsN. (2005). The birth of the ‘Kodak moment’: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26, 1665–1687.
54.
MutchA. (2003). Communities of practice and habitus: A critique. Organization Studies, 24, 383–401.
55.
MutchA. (2007). Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration. Organization Studies, 28, 1123–1140.
56.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
57.
OliverC. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249–273.
61.
OrrJ. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
62.
PentlandB. T.FeldmanM. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 793–815.
63.
ReckwitzA. (2002), Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263.
64.
SchatzkiT. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In SchatzkiT. R.Knorr-CetinaK.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
65.
SchatzkiT. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies26, 465–484.
66.
ScottW. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.
67.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
SeoM. G.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
69.
SewellW. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
70.
SpenderJ-C. (1995). Organizations are activity systems, not merely systems of thought. In ShrivastavaC.StubbartC. (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Managementvol.12B (pp. 153–181). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72.
SuchmanM. C. (1995), Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
73.
SztompkaP. (1991). Society in action: The theory of social becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
74.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843.
75.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.
76.
TolbertP. S. (1988). Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms. In ZuckerL. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 101–113). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
77.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175–190). London: Sage.
78.
TsoukasH. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14, 551–561.
79.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003a). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Eindrapport Parlementaire Enquêtecommissie Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 6. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
80.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003b). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Verhoren 1 t/m 38, 28 244, no. 7. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
81.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003c). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Verhoren 39 t/m 67, 28 244, no. 7. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
82.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003d). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 1: Economische Structuurkenmerken van de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 8. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
83.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003e). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 2: Aard en Omvang van Onregelmatigheden in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 9. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
84.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003f). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 3: Casuistiek uit de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 10. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
85.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003g). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 4: Juridische Aspecten van de Aanbesteding, Mededinging en Contractering in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 11. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
86.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2003h). Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 5: De Rol van de Overheid in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 12. ’s Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers.
87.
Van de VenA. M. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
VulperhorstL. (2005). Verzwegen onderneming: ondernemers, overheid en het einde van het bouwkartel (2001–2005). Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
89.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90.
WhittingtonR. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27, 613–634.
91.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
92.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
93.
ZuckerL. G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In ZuckerL. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 23–49). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
