Research dealing with governmental and managerial ideals and tools for transparency has observed how these tools co-create new types of blindness. It has documented the existence of three different types of blindness: blindness caused by power games, by cognitive limitations and blindness as a side effect of the categories applied. This paper puts forward a fourth type of organizational blindness in addition to the already documented ones, namely self-imposed blindness to potentially destructive information. This paper studies how relevant - but problematic - information is actively ignored and kept out of sight in the decision processes by looking at a specific case study involving the construction of a model intended to control, and render transparent, the quality of health services in Denmark. This paper outlines the forms of inattentiveness which make communication blind to information that could question the quality model. Five forms of inattentiveness are identified that function as answers to the question of how communication avoids actualizing relevant but also potentially destructive information. This study documents a considerable amount of blindness to potentially relevant themes and it points to activities that produce this blindness as they reduce the probability that potentially destructive subjects are actualized. Information is not only something organizations need, but may also be something they protect themselves against. In that case, the forms of inattentiveness may be a function that forms organizational processes.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. ( 1962). Two faces of power. In F. G. Castles, D. J. Murray, & D.C. Potter (Eds.), Decision, organisations and society (pp. 947-952). London: Penguin.
2.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. ( 1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. The American Political Science Review, 57, 632-642.
3.
Baecker, D. (Ed.) (1993a). Probleme der Form. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
4.
Baecker, D. (Ed.) (1993b). Kalkül der Form. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
5.
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. ( 2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration , 84, 517-538.
6.
Blomgren, M. ( 2007). The drive for transparency: Organizational field transformations in Swedish health care. Public Administration, 85, 67-82.
7.
Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
8.
Boström, M., & Garsten, C. (Eds.). (2008). Organizing transnational accountability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9.
Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. ( 2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences . London: MIT Press.
10.
Brandum, L., Pedersen, S. , & Ottesen, E. ( 2010). Mellem tilpasning og afsporing. Om beslutningen af Den Danske Kvalitetsmodel. In M. Knudsen, & E.Z. Bentsen (Eds.), Kamp, kommunikation og kompleksitet. Ledelse og fortolkninger i det danske sundhedsvæsen (pp. 101-124). Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens forlag.
11.
Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B., et al. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F.W. (2009). Sociology and complexity science: A new field of inquiry. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
13.
Cilliers, P. ( 1998). Complexity and postmodernism : Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
14.
Cyert, R.M. ( 1990). Defining leadership and explicating the process. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 1, 29-38.
15.
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. ( 1963). Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Esposito, E. ( 1996). Observing interpretation: A sociological view of hermeneutics . MLN, 111, 593-619.
17.
Færgeman, O. ( 2002). Evidensbaseret medicin, sundhedspolitik og administrativ kontrol med lægers arbejde. Ugeskrift for læger , 164, 1538-1543.
18.
Gabriel, Y., Hirschhorn, L., McCollom Hampton, M., Schwartz, H.S., & Swogger, G. ( 1999). Organizations in depth: The psychoanalysis of organizations . London: SAGE.
19.
Garsten, C., & de Montoya, M. L. ( Eds.) (2008). Transparency in a new global order. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
20.
Goffman, E. ( 1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
21.
Groene, O., Klazinga, N., Kazandjian, V., Lombrail, P., & Bartels, P. ( 2008). The World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in Hospitals (PATH): An analysis of the pilot implementation in 37 hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20, 155-161.
22.
Grossman, E., Luque, E., & Muniesa, F. ( 2008). Economies through transparency. In C. Garsten & M. L. de Montoya (Eds.), Transparency in a new global order (pp. 97-121). Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
23.
Gulbrandsen, L.H. ( 2008). Organizing accountability in transnational standards organizations: The Forest Stewardship Council as a good governance model. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 61-79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24.
Haugaard, M. ( 1997). The Constitution of power: A theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25.
Heald, D. ( 2006). Varieties of transparency. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance?Proceedings of the British Academy135 (pp. 25-43). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
26.
Hood, C. ( 2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance?Proceedings of the British Academy135 (pp. 3-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Hood, C. ( 2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance ? Public Management Review, 9, 191-210.
28.
Kerwer, D. ( 2008). Watchdogs beyond control? The accountability of accounting standards organizations. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 98-113). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29.
Knudsen, M. ( 2005). Displacing the paradox of decision-making: The management of contingency in the modernization of a Danish county. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 107-126). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
30.
Knudse, M. ( 2006). Autolysis within organizations: A case study, Soziale Systeme, 12, 79-99.
31.
Knudsen, M. ( 2007). Structural couplings between organizations and function systems: Looking at standards in health care. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14, 111-131.
32.
Knudsen, M. ( 2011). Surprised by method: Functional method and systems theory . Historical Social Research, 36, 124-142.
33.
Levay, C., & Waks, C. (Eds.) (2006). Strävan efter transparens: granskning, styrning och organisering i sjukvårdens nätverk. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
34.
Levay, C., & Waks, C. ( 2009). Professions and the pursuit of transparency in healthcare: Two cases of soft autonomy, Organization Studies, 30, 509-527.
35.
Luhmann, N. ( 1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
36.
Luhmann, N. ( 1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Luhmann, N. ( 1997). The control of intransparency. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14, 359-371.
38.
Luhmann, N., & Fuchs, P. ( 1989). Reden und Schweigen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
39.
March, J.G. ( 1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587-608.
40.
March, J.G. ( 1988). Decisions and organizations. London : Basil Blackwell.
41.
March, J.G., & Simon, H. ( 1993[1958]). Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
Merton, R.K. ( 1963[1957]). Social theory and social structure . Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
43.
Miller, K.D. ( 2008). Simon and Polanyi on rationality and knowledge. Organization Studies, 29, 933-955.
44.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. ( 2008). Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
45.
Moore, W.E., & Tumin, M.M. ( 1949). Some social functions of ignorance. American Sociological Review, 14, 787-795.
46.
Munro, R., & Mouritsen, J. (Eds.) (1996). Accountability: Power, ethos and the technologies of managing. London: International Thomson Business Press.
47.
Neyland, D. ( 2007). Achieving transparency: The visible, invisible and divisible in academic accountability networks. Organization, 14, 499-516.
48.
Porter, T.M. ( 1994). Making things quantitative. Science in Context, 7, 389-407.
49.
Power, M. ( 1994). The audit society. In A. G. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practice (pp. 299-316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Power, M. ( 1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 289-315.
51.
Power, M. ( 1997). The Audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Power, M. ( 2008). Foreword. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. xv-xvii). Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
53.
Roberts, J.S., Coale, J.G., & Redman, R.R. ( 1987). A history of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. JAMA, 258, 936-940.
54.
Rose, N. ( 1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Scrivens, E. ( 1995). Accreditation: Protecting the professional or the consumer?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
56.
Seidl, D. ( 2007). The dark side of knowledge. E:CO, 9/3, 16-29.
57.
Shaw, C.D. ( 2000). External quality mechanisms for health care: Summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 12, 169-175.
58.
Shaw, C.D. ( 2003). Evaluation accreditation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15, 455-456.
59.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. ( 2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 57-89). London: Routledge .
60.
Simmel, G. ( 1992[1908]). Soziologie. Undersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Gesamtausgabe Band 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
61.
Sloterdijk, P. ( 1983). Kritik der zynischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
62.
Strauss, A.L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. ( 1997). Social organization of medical work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
63.
Thedvall, R. ( 2008a). Transparency at work: the production of indicators for EU employment policy. In Garsten, C. & M. L. de Montoya (Eds.), Transparency in a new global order (pp. 143-159). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64.
Thedvall, R. ( 2008b). Rituals of legitimation: Organizing accountability in EU employment policy. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 131-146). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
65.
Timmermans, S., Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. ( 1998). The architecture of difference. In M. Berg & A. Mol, (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 202-225). Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
66.
Walshe, K., Wallace, L., Freeman, T., Latham, L., & Spurgeon, P. ( 2001). The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: A qualitative study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13, 367-374.
67.
West, H. G., & Sanders, T. (Eds.) (2003). Transparency and conspiracy: Ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68.
Zizek, S. ( 1997). The sublime object of ideology. London : Verso.
69.
vretveit, J. ( 2001). Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care. International Journal of Health Planning and Management , 16, 229-241.
70.
vretveit, J. ( 2003). What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals?Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
