Drawing on the work of Norbert Elias, this paper argues that attention to the historical and ‘figurational’ context of organization studies is necessary in order to understand the impact of its scholarship on management practice and public policy. This perspective is used to question conventional wisdom about the ‘failings’ of the organization studies field. In particular, attention is paid to (1) questioning the argument that the impact of organization studies is limited by its pluralism; (2) related paradigm incommensurability debates; (3) challenging other supposed limitations of the field, such as a tendency toward ‘fads and fashions’. In addition, it is argued that high impact may be associated with fields that have low control, and that single overarching strategies may be ineffective in raising impact. In presenting such argument, emphasis is placed on the significance of the dominant logics of governance of particular historical eras. In so doing, the paper draws attention to the need to consider the ethical and political questions raised by attempts to increase impact.
Abbott, A.2001Chaos of disciplines. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2.
Abbott, A.2004Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences . New York: W. W. Norton .
3.
Abrahamson, E.1996‘Management fashion’. Academy of Management Review31: 254-285.
4.
Abrahamson, E., and M. Eisenman2001‘Why management scholars must intervene strategically in the management knowledge market’. Human Relations54: 67-75.
5.
Astley, W.G., and R.F. Zammuto1992‘Organization science, managers and language games’ . Organization Science3/4: 443-460.
6.
Austen-Smith, D., J.A. Frieden, M.A. Golden, and K.O. Moen2008Selected works of Michael Wallerstein: The political economy of inequality, unions, and social democracy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bansal, P., and J. Gao2006‘Building the future by looking to the past: Examining research published on organizations and environment’. Organization and Environment19/4: 458-478.
8.
Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim2002Individualization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Bedeian, A.1987‘Organization theory’ in International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 2. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (eds). Chichester: Wiley.
10.
Benders, J., and K. van de Veen2001‘What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions’. Organization8: 33-53.
11.
Bendix, R.1956Work and authority in industry. New York: Harper and Row.
12.
Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello2005The new spirit of capitalism. London : Verso.
13.
Booth, C., and M. Rowlinson2006‘Management and organizational history: Prospects’ . Management and Organizational History1: 5-30.
14.
Bourdieu, P.1990Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
15.
Bourdieu, P.1998Acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market . New York: The New Press.
16.
Bourdieu, P.2003Firing back: Against the tyranny of the market 2. London : Verso.
17.
Bourdieu, P.2005The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
Brady, F.N.1997‘Finding a history of management’. Journal of Management Inquiry6: 160-167.
19.
Brunsson, N.2000The irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. Copenhagen : Copenhagen Business School Press.
20.
Burkitt, I.1996‘Civilization and ambivalence’. British Journal of Sociology47/1: 135-50.
21.
Burrell, G., and G. Morgan1979Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis . London: Heinemann.
22.
Callon, M., editor 1998The laws of the markets. London: Blackwell .
23.
Callon, M.1999‘Actor-network theory - the market test’ in Actor network theory and after. J. Law and J. Hassard (eds), 181-195. Oxford : Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
24.
Callon, M.2007‘What does it mean to say that economics is performative?’ in Do economists make markets: On the performativity of economics . D. Mackenzie , F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds), 311-357. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
25.
Chandler, A. Dupont, Jr1962The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Chartier, R.1997On the edge of the cliff: History, language, and practices . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Clark, P., and M. Rowlinson2004‘The treatment of history in organization studies: Toward an "historic turn"‘? Business History46: 331-352.
28.
Clark, T.2004‘The fashion of management fashion: A surge too far’ ? Organization11: 271-280.
29.
Clegg, S.2003‘Managing organization futures in a changing world of power/knowledge’ in The Oxford handbook of organization theory. H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (eds), 536-567. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Collins, R.1975Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science . New York: Academic Press.
31.
Coopey, J.2003Sustainable development and environmental management: The performance of UK business schools. Management Learning34: 5-26.
32.
Cullenberg, S., J. Amariglio, and D. Ruccio2001‘Introduction’ in Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio and D. F. Ruccio (eds), 3-57. New York: Routledge .
33.
Donaldson, L.1985In defence of organization theory: A reply to the critics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Donaldson, L.1995American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Donaldson, L.2005‘Following the scientific method: How I became a committed functionalist and positivist’. Organization Studies26: 1071-1088.
36.
Dow, S.2001‘Modernism and postmodernism: A dialectical analysis’ in Postmodernism, economics and knowledge . S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio and D. F. Ruccio (eds), 61-76. New York: Routledge.
37.
Du Gay, P.1996Consumption and identity at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Eccles, R.G., and N. Nohria1992Beyond the hype: Rediscovering the essence of management . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
Edgerton, D.2006The shock of the old: Technology and global history since 1900. London: Profile Books.
40.
Elias, N.1970What is sociology?New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
Elias, N.1982‘Scientific establishments’ in Scientific establishments and hierarchies. N. Elias, H. Martins and R. Whitley (eds), 3-69. Dordrecht: Reidel.
42.
Elias, N.1991The society of individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Elias, N.1994The civilizing process, vols 1 and 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
44.
Fabian, F.H.2000‘Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline’. Academy of Management Review25: 350-371.
45.
Ferraro, F., J. Pfeffer, and R.I. Sutton2005‘Economics language and assumptions: How theories become self-fulfilling’. Academy of Management Review30: 8-24.
46.
Ferraro, F., J. Pfeffer, and R.I. Sutton2009 ‘How and why theories matter: A comment on Felin and Foss (2009)’ . Organization Science20/3: 669-675.
47.
Fourcade-Gourinchas, M., and S.L. Babb2002‘The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries’. American Journal of Sociology108: 533-579.
48.
Fournier, V., and C. Grey1999‘Too much, too little and too often: A critique of du Gay’s analysis of enterprise’. Organization6/1: 107-128.
49.
Friedman, M.1999‘Conversation with Milton Friedman’ in Conversations with leading economists: Interpreting modern macroeconomics . B. Snowdon and H. R. Vane (eds), 124-144. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
50.
Garrigou, A., and B. Lacroix1997Norbert Elias, la politique et l’histoire . Paris: La Decouverte.
51.
Ghoshal, S.2005‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’. Academy of Management Learning and Education4: 75-91.
52.
Glick, W.H., C.C. Miller, and L.B. Cardinal2007‘Making a life in the field of organization science’ . Journal of Organizational Behaviour28: 817-835.
53.
Grint, K.1994‘Reengineering history: Social resonances and business process reengineering’. Organization1: 179-201.
54.
Hacking, I.1999The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
55.
Hambrick, D.C.1994‘What if the Academy actually mattered? ’ Academy of Management Review19: 11-16.
56.
Hammer, M., and J. Champy1993‘Reengineering the corporation’. Insights Quarterly (Summer): 3-19.
57.
Hassard, J.1988‘Overcoming hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability’. Human Relations41: 247-259.
58.
Heinich, N.2002La sociologie de Norbert Elias. Paris : La Decouverte.
59.
Holm, P.2007‘Which way is up on Callon?’ in Do economists make markets: On the performativity of economics. D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds), 225-243. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
60.
Jackson, N., and P. Carter1993‘"Paradigm wars": A response to Hugh Willmott’ . Organization Studies14: 721-725.
61.
Jacques, R.1996Manufacturing the employee: Management knowledge from the 19th to 21st centuries. London: Sage.
62.
Jermier, J.M., L.C. Forbes, S. Benn, and R.J. Orsato2006‘The new corporate environmentalism and green politics’ in Handbook of organizational studies, 2nd edn. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence and Walter Nord (eds), 619-650. London : Sage.
63.
Kallio, T.J., and P. Nordberg2006‘The evolution of organizations and the natural environment discourse: Some critical remarks’. Organization and Environment19/4: 439-457.
64.
Kieser, A.1994‘Why organization theory needs historical analysis - and how this should be performed’. Organization Science5: 608-620.
65.
Kieser, A.1997‘Rhetoric and myth in management fashions’ . Organization4: 49-74.
66.
Koontz, H.1961‘The management theory jungle’. Journal of the Academy of Management4: 174-188.
67.
Kuhn, T.S.1962The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Kunda, G.1992Engineering culture. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
69.
Lammers, C.J.1988‘Transience and persistence of ideal types in organization theory’ in Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 6. N. DiTomaso and S. B. Bacharach (eds). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Lawson, A.2003Reorienting economics. New York : Routledge.
72.
Lipsey, R.G.2001‘Successes and failures in the transformation of economics’. Journal of Economic Methodology8: 169-201.
73.
Lockwood, D.1956‘Some remarks on "the social system"’ . British Journal of Sociology7: 134-146.
74.
Lodahl, J.B., and G. Gordon1972‘The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments’. American Sociological Review37: 57-72.
75.
Loyal, S., and S. Quilley2004The sociology of Norbert Elias. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
76.
Mackenzie, D., F. Muniesa , and L. Siu, editors 2007Do economists make markets: On the performativity of economics . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
77.
McKinlay, A.2002‘Dead selves: The birth of the modern career’ . Organization9/4: 595-614.
78.
Mauws, M.K., and N. Phillips1995‘Understanding language games’. Organization Science6/3: 322-334.
79.
Mennell, S.1998Norbert Elias: An introduction. Dublin : University College Dublin Press.
80.
Merton, R.K.1973The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
Miller, P., and N. Rose1990‘Governing economic life’. Economy and Society19: 1-31.
82.
Miller, P., and N. Rose2008Governing the present. Cambridge : Polity.
83.
Mitchell, T.2002Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity . Berkeley: University of California Press.
84.
Moss Kanter, R.1990When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s. London : Unwin Hyman.
85.
Mouzelis, N.1995Sociological theory: What went wrong?London: Routledge.
86.
Newton, T.J.1996‘Agency and discourse: Recruiting consultants in a life insurance company’. Sociology30: 717-739.
87.
Newton, T.J.1998‘Theorising subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies?’ Organization Studies19/3: 415-447.
88.
Newton, T.J.1999‘Power, subjectivity and British industrial and organizational sociology: The relevance of the work of Norbert Elias’ . Sociology33/2: 411-440.
89.
Newton, T. J., editor 2001‘Elias and organizations’. Organization8/3: 459-465.
90.
Newton, T.J.2002‘Creating the new ecological order? ’ Academy of Management Review27/4: 523-540.
91.
Newton, T.J.2003‘Credit and civilization’. British Journal of Sociology54/3: 347-371.
92.
Newton, T.J.2004‘From freemasons to the employee: Organization, history and subjectivity’. Organization Studies25/8: 1363-1387.
93.
Newton, T.J.2005‘Practical idealism: An oxymoron? ’ Journal of Management Studies42/4: 869-884.
94.
Newton, T.J.2007Nature and sociology. London : Routledge.
95.
Newton, T.J.2009‘Organizations and the natural environment’ in The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. M. Alvesson, H. Willmott and T. Bridgman (eds), 125-143. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
96.
Newton, T.J., and G. Harte1997‘Green business: Technicist kitsch? ’ Journal of Management Studies34/1: 75-98.
97.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons2001Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity .
98.
Parker, M.1992‘Post-modern organisations or postmodern organisation theory’? Organization Studies13: 1-17.
99.
Parker, M.2000‘The sociology of organizations and the organization of sociology: Some reflections on the making of a division of labour’ . The Sociological Review48: 124-146.
100.
Parker, M.2002Against management: Organization in the age of managerialism . Cambridge: Polity.
101.
Perrow, C.1973‘The short and glorious history of organizational theory’. Organizational Dynamics2: 2-15.
102.
Peters, T.J., and R.H. Waterman Jr1982In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. Philadelphia: Harper and Row.
103.
Pfeffer, J.1982Organizataions and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
104.
Pfeffer, J.1993‘Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable’. Academy of Management Review18: 599-620.
105.
Pfeffer, J.1997New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects . New York: Oxford University Press .
106.
Pfeffer, J., and C.T. Fong2002‘The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye’. Academy of Management Learning and Education1/1: 78-95.
107.
Pfeffer, J., and C.T. Fong2005‘Building organization theory from first principles: The self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence’. Organization Science16: 372-388.
108.
Powell, W.W., and R. Robbins1984‘Introduction’ in Conflict and consensus: A festschrift in honor of Lewis A. Coser. W. W. Powell and R. Robbins (eds), 3-23. New York : Free Press .
109.
Reed, M.1992The sociology of organizations. London : Harverster Wheatsheaf.
110.
Rose, M.1975Industrial behaviour: Theoretical development since Taylor . London: Allen Lane.
111.
Rose, N., and P. Miller1992‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’. British Journal of Sociology43/2: 173-205.
112.
Rowlinson, M., and J. Hassard1993‘The invention of corporate culture: A history of the histories of Cadbury’. Human Relations46: 299-326.
113.
Rubinstein, A.1995‘John Nash: The master of economic modeling’ . Scandinavian Journal of Economics97: 9-13.
114.
Rynes, S.L., and D.L. Shapiro2005‘Public policy and the public interest: What if we mattered more?’ Academy of Management Journal48: 925-927.
115.
Scherer, A.G.1998‘Pluralism and incommensurability in strategic management and organization theory: A problem in search of a solution’ . Organization5: 147-168.
116.
Schultz, M., and M.J. Hatch1996‘Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies’. Academy of Management Review21: 529-557.
117.
Sennett, R.1998The corrosion of character. London: Norton.
118.
Skocpol, T., editor 1984Vision and method in historical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
119.
Smith, C., J. Child, and M. Rowlinson1990Reshaping work: The Cadbury experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
120.
Smith, D.1991The rise of historical sociology. Cambridge : Polity.
121.
Spell, C.S.2001‘Management fashions: Where do they come from, and are they old wine in new bottles?’ Journal of Management Inquiry10: 358-373.
122.
Thompson, P., and S. Ackroyd1995‘All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in British industrial sociology’. Sociology29/4: 615-633.
123.
Üsdiken, B., and A. Kieser2004‘Introduction: History in organisation studies’ . Business History46: 321-330.
124.
Van de Ven, A.2002‘Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This academy is for you’. Academy of Management Review27: 171-184.
125.
Van Iterson, A.,W. Mastenbroek , T. J. Newton, and D. Smith, editors 2002The civilized organisation: Norbert Elias and the future of organisation studies . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
126.
Van Krieken, R.1998Norbert Elias. London: Routledge.
127.
Van Krieken, R.1999‘The barbarism of civilization: Cultural genocide and the ‘‘stolen generations’’’. British Journal of Sociology50/2: 297-315.
128.
Weaver, G.R., and D.A. Gioia1994‘Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs structurationist inquiry’. Organization Studies15: 565-590.
129.
Whitley, R.2000The intellectual and social organization of the sciences , 2nd edn. New York : Oxford University Press.
130.
Wilkinson, R.G., and K. Pickett2009The spirit level. London: Allen Lane.
131.
Willmott, H.1993‘Breaking the paradigm mentality’. Organization Studies14: 681-719.
132.
Wouters, C.1977‘Informalisation and the civilising process’ in Human figurations: Essays for Norbert Elias. P. Gleichmann, J. Goudsblom and H. Korte (eds). Amsterdam: Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift .
133.
Wouters, C.1986‘Formalization and informalization: Changing tension balances in civilizing processes’. Theory, culture and society3/2: 1-18.
134.
Wouters, C.2007Informalization: Manners and emotions since 1890 . London: Sage.
135.
Zald, M.N.1993‘Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field’ . Organization Science4: 513-528.
