A post-deconstruction ethics of honoring, respecting, and/or theorizing anOther via a concept of polyphony seems very attractive to organizational studies (De Cock and Jeanes 2006; Clegg et al. 2006). Many organizational studies intellectuals prefer ‘reasonableness’ and/or ‘historical meanings’ as an object of study to a more empirical one. This rhetorical strategy (amongst others) has claimed polyphony as a leading concept, celebrating dialogue, diversity, and intertextuality. But, as Gayatri Spivak has indicated, it is necessary to ask if anOther speaks at all in such practices. Spivak (1999) explores polyphony in terms of the subaltern and her (his) representation, making use of différance to clarify what a many-voiced perspective actually could imply. In this article, I deconstruct two organizational studies articles on polyphony, making use of Spivak’s insights.
Bakhtin, M.1982The dialogic imagination: Four essays, trans. Michael Holquist . Austen: University of Texas Press .
2.
Bakhtin, M.1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
Barry, D., and M. Elmes1997‘Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’. Academy of Management Review22/2: 429-453.
4.
Belova, O., I. King, and M. Silwa2008‘Introduction: Polyphony and organizational studies’ . Organization Studies9/4: 493-500.
5.
Bilimoria, P.2002‘Postcolonial critique of reason: Spivak between Kant and Matilal’. Interventions4/2: 160-167.
6.
Boje, D.1995‘Stories of storytelling organisation’. Academy of Management Journal38/4: 997-1035.
7.
Boje, D.2006‘The Kuk Dong story’, consulted 5 May 2006: http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje
8.
Bourdieu, P., and J-C. Passeron1973‘Cultural reproduction and social reproduction’ in Knowledge, education and cultural change. R. Brown (ed.). London: Tavistock .
9.
Clegg, S., M. Kornberger, C. Carter, and C. Rhodes2006‘For management?’Management Learning37/1: 7-17.
10.
Czarniawska, B.1999Writing management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
De Cock, C., and E. Jeanes2006‘Questioning consensus, cultivating conflict’ . Journal of Management Inquiry15/1: 18-30.
12.
Derrida, J.1997Politics of friendship. New York: Verso.
13.
Derrida, J.1998Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
14.
Elsbach, K., R. Sutton, and D. Whetton1999‘Perspectives on developing management theory, circa 1999’. Academy of Management Review24/4: 627-633.
15.
Gergen, K.1995‘Global organization: From imperialism to ethical vision’. Organization2/3-4: 519-532.
16.
Hazen, M.1993‘Towards polyphonic organization’. Journal of Organizational Change Management6/5: 15-26.
17.
Hazen, M.1994‘Multiplicity and change in persons and organizations’ . Journal of Organizational Change Management7/5: 72-81.
18.
Jones, C.2005‘Practical deconstructivist feminist Marxist organization theory: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’ in Contemporary organization theory. Campbell Jones and Rolland Munro (eds), 228-244. Oxford: Blackwell .
19.
Kornberger, M., S. Clegg, and C. Carter2006‘Rethinking the polyphonic organization’. Scandinavian Journal of Management22: 3-30.
20.
Kurtzman, H.1987‘Deconstruction and psychology’. New Ideas in Psychology5/1: 33-71.
21.
Letiche, H.2004‘Lyotard and organization’ in Postmodernism organization. S. Linstead (ed.). London: Sage.
22.
Morgan, G.1986Images of organization. London: Sage.
23.
Morson, G., and C. Emerson1990Mikhal Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaic. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24.
Parker, M.2002Against management: Organisation in the age of managerialism . Cambridge: Polity Press.
Spivak, G.C.1985‘Can the subaltern speak?’ Wedge7/8: 120-130. Revised version in (1999) A critique of postcolonial reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Spivak, G.C.1993Outside the teaching machine. London : Routledge.
28.
Spivak, G.C.1996The Spivak reader. New York: Routledge.
29.
Spivak, G.C.1999A critique of postcolonial reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Spivak, G.C.2003Death of a discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
Styhre, A.2005‘Subaltern management studies: Are they critical?’Paper CMS-4Cambridge University 4-6 July.
32.
Waggoner, M.2005‘Death of a discipline’. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory6/2: 130-141.
33.
Weick, K.1995Sensemaking in organizations. London : Sage.
34.
Wikipedia2008www.,en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difference consulted 1 May 2008.
