This article provides a conceptual underpinning for the study of bricolage in organizations. Based on a review of Claude Lévi-Strauss’s original writing, we propose that bricolage involves an ideal-typical configuration of acting (practice), knowing (epistemology) and an underlying world view (metaphysics) and develop the opposed ideal-types of the bricoleur and the engineer. We then explore and propose to distinguish two forms of collective bricolage—familiar and convention-based—depending on the type of interaction and the nature of the conventions employed. Finally, we highlight the tension between ideal-typical bricolage and general organizational norms and standards, and discuss both the bricoleur’s legitimacy and how a bricolage-based arrangement might be embedded into an organizational context.
Baker, Ted, and Howard E. Aldrich2000‘Bricolage and resource-seeking: Improvisational responses to dependence in entrepreneurial firms’. Working paper. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2.
Baker, Ted, and Reed E. Nelson2005‘Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage’. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 329-366.
3.
Baker, Ted, Anne S. Miner, and Dale T. Eesley2003‘Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving, and improvisational competency in the founding process’ . Research Policy32: 255-276.
4.
Bandura, Albert1977‘Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change’. Psychological Review84: 191-215.
5.
Barley, Stephen R.1996. ‘Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies’. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 404-441.
6.
Ciborra, Claudio1992‘From thinking to tinkering: The grassroots of strategic information systems’. The Information Society8: 297-309.
7.
Ciborra, Claudio1996Teams, markets and systems: Business innovation and information technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Ciborra, Claudio2002The labyrinths of information. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Coutu, Diane L.2002‘How resilience works’. Harvard Business Review80(5): 46-51.
10.
Cunha, Joao, Miguel Cunha, and Rita Cunha2000‘Improvisation and learning: Soulmates or just friends?’ in Innovative theories, tools, and practices in work and organizational psychology. M. Vartiainen, F. Avallone and N. Anderson (eds), 307-320. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
11.
De Certeau, Michel1990L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.
12.
Duymedjian, Raffi, and Sandrine Ansart2007‘From the creative destructor to the entrepreneur-bricoleur: A contribution to Schumpeter’s theory of entrepreneurial innovation’ in Rediscovering Schumpeter . E. G. Carayannis and C. Ziemnowicz (eds), 143-170. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
Duymedjian, Raffi, and Charles-Clemens Rüling2005. ‘Le manager bricoleur: Essai de construction d’une image légitime’ in Moderniser la gestion des hommes dans l’entreprise . M. Matmati and M. Le Berre (eds), 185-217. Paris: Liaisons .
14.
Garud, Raghu, and Peter Karnøe2003‘Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneuship’. Research Policy32: 277-300.
15.
German, Tim. P., and H. Clark Barrett2005‘Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture’. Psychological Science16: 1-5.
16.
Lanzara, Giovan Francesco, and Gerardo Patriotta2001‘Technology and the courtroom: an inquiry into knowledge making in organizations’. Journal of Management Studies38: 943-971.
17.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude1966The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Linstead, Stephen, and Robert Grafton-Small1990‘Organizational bricolage’ in Organizational symbolism. B. A. Turner (ed.), 291-309. Berlin: de Gruyter .
19.
Livet Pierre, and Laurent Thévenot2004‘Les catégories de l’action collective’ in Analyse économique des conventions. A. Orléan (ed.), 163- 191. Paris: PUF.
20.
Moorman, Christine, and Anne S. Miner1998‘Organizational improvisation and organizational memory’. Academy of Management Review23: 698-723.
21.
Nisbett, Richard E.2003The geography of thought. New York: Free Press.
22.
Nisbett, Richard E., Kaiting Peng, Incheol Choi, and Ara Norenzayan2001‘Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition’. Psychological Review108: 291-310.
23.
Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Noboru Konno1998‘The concept of "ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation’. California Management Review40: 40-54.
24.
Orlikowski, Wanda J.1996‘Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective’. Information Systems Research7/1: 63-92.
25.
Orlikowski, Wanda J.2000‘Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations’. Organization Science11: 404-428.
26.
Orr, Julian1996Talking about machines: An ethnography of modern job. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
27.
Schatzki, Theodore2002The site of the social. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
28.
Schatzki, Theodore, Karin D. Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, eds 2001The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
29.
Schön, Donald A., and Geraint Wiggins1992‘Kinds of seeing and their function in designing’. Design Studies13: 135-156.
30.
Simon, Herbert A.1997Administrative behavior, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.
31.
Smith, Brian C.1999‘Situatedness/embeddedness’ in The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. R. A. Wilson and F. Keil (eds), 769-770. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Spender, J.-C.1996‘Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: Three concepts in search of a theory’. Journal of Organizational Change Management9/1: 63-78.
33.
Thévenot, Laurent1984‘Rules and implements: Investments in forms’ . Social Science Information23: 1-45.
34.
Thévenot, Laurent2001‘Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world’ in The practice turn in contemporary theory . K. Knorr-Cetina, T. Schatzki and E von Savigny (eds), 56-73. London : Routledge.
35.
Weber, Max1997The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
36.
Weick, Karl E.1993‘The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster’. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 628-652.
37.
Weick, Karl E.1998‘Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis’. Organization Science9: 543-555.
