The paper by Armbrüster and Glückler (2007) contains some interesting material on the development of the consultancy industry and on the more recent nature of internationalization. However, their paper severely misrepresents and distorts most of what we have written. The argument it makes therefore does not affect what we have said, and it does not acknowledge that important parts of our treatment are compatible with what they say. In fact, the flow of discussion from our essai to theirs shows the continuing topicality of our worries and propositions.
Armbrüster, Thomas, and Johannes Glücker2007 `Organizational change and the economics of management consulting: A response to Sorge and van Witteloostuijn '. Organization Studies28/12: 1873—1885.
2.
Boonstra, Jaap2000Lopen over water. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers AUP.
3.
Brakman, Steven, Harry Garretsen, Charles van Marrewijk, and Arjen van Witteloostuijn2006Nations and firms in the global economy: An introduction into international economics and business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Emery, Fred E., and Eric L. Trist1973Towards a social ecology. London: Plenum Press.
5.
Sorge, Arndt, and Arjen van Witteloostuijn2004 `The (non)sense of organizational change: An essai about universal management hypes, sick consultancy metaphors, and healthy organization theories'. Organization Studies25: 1205—1231.
6.
Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen1999De anorexiastrategie. Over de gevolgen van saneren. Amsterdam and Antwerp: Uitgeverij De Arbeiderspers.
