The craft of idea generation is explored autobiographically, using as the core principle the theme that ideas generate their own contexts for development. Ideas generate their own contexts by means of conceptual affinities, as is illustrated by the author’s movement from ideas about unintended consequences to ideas about cognitive dissonance, enacted environments, organizational failures, and wisdom. Ideas also generate their own context by means of the assumptions they entail, in the author’s case, these entailments being assumptions of continuity, evolution, ambivalence, complexity, and levels of analysis. When activated, these diverse resources may generate portraits of human organizing that have poetic overtones, but that resemblance simply mirrors the fact that people do poetry in their everyday living.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Azevedo, J. 2002 ‘Updating organizational epistemology’ in The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. J. A. C. Baum (ed.), 715–732. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
2.
Bloom, H. 2002 Genius. New York: Warner .
3.
Campbell, D. T. 1965 ‘Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution’ in Social Change in Developing Areas. H. R. Barringer, G. I. Blanksten, and R. Mack (eds), 19–49. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman .
4.
Czarniawska, B. 2003 ‘The styles and stylists of organization theory’ in The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (eds), 237–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
5.
Festinger, L. 1957 A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
6.
Gehman Jr, H. W. 2003 Columbia Accident Investigation Board: Report, Volume One. Washington, DC: US Government .
7.
Gleason, P. 1991 ‘ LCES: A key to safety in the wildland fire environment ’. Fire Management Notes52/4: 9 .
8.
Goffman, E. 1959 The Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday .
9.
Harmon-Jones, E., and C. Harmon-Jones 2003 ‘ Whatever happened to cognitive dissonance theory? ’ The General Psychologist38/2: 28–33 .
10.
James, W. 1890 Principles of psychology. New York: Dover .
11.
James, W. 1897/1956 The will to believe. New York: Dover .
12.
Kahnemann, D. 2003 ‘Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics’. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
13.
Klein, G. 2003 Intuition at work. New York: Doubleday .
14.
Latour, B. 1987 Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
15.
McKelvey, B. 2002 ‘Model-centered organization science epistemology’ in The Blackwell companion to organizations. J. A. C. Baum (ed.), 752–780. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
16.
March, J. G., and H. A. Simon 1958 Organizations. New York: Wiley .
17.
Meacham, J. A. 1990 ‘The loss of wisdom’ in Wisdom. R. J. Sternberg (ed.), 181–211. New York: Cambridge University Press .
18.
Mead, G. H. 1956 Social psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago .
19.
Miller, J. G. 1978 Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill .
20.
Orlikowski, W. J. 1996 ‘ Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective ’. Information Systems Research7/1: 63–92 .
21.
Paget, M. 1988 The unity of mistakes: A phenomenological interpretation of medical work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
22.
Pepinsky, H. B., J. Riner, M. Moll, and K. E. Weick 1966 ‘Research team productivity’ in Studies on behavior in organizations. R. Bower (ed.), 135–156. Athens, GA: University of Georgia .
23.
Perrow, C. 1984 Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books .
24.
Reason, J. 1997 Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate .
25.
Salancik, G. R. 1977 ‘Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief’ in New Directions in Organizational Behavior. B. M. Staw and G. R. Salancik (eds), 1–54. Chicago: St. Clair Press .
26.
Schutz, W. 1979 Profound simplicity. New York: Bantam .
27.
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1982 ‘ Should sociologists forget their mothers and fathers? ’ The American Sociologist17 (February): 2–11 .
28.
Taylor, J. R., and E. J. Van Every 2000 The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
29.
Thayer, H. S. 1967 ‘Pragmatism’ in The encyclopedia of philosophy, Vol. 6. P. Edwards (ed.), 430–436. New York: Macmillan .
30.
Thompson, J. D. 1967 Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill .
31.
Weick, K. E. 1969 Social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
32.
Weick, K. E. 1979 The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
33.
Weick, K. E. 1992 ‘ Agenda setting in organizational behavior: A theory-focused approach ’. Journal of Management Inquiry1/3: 171–182 .
34.
Weick, K. E. 1993 ‘Turning context into text: An academic life as data’ in Management Laureates: A collection of autobiographical essays. A. Bedeian (ed.), 285–323. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
35.
Weick, K. E. 1995 Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
36.
Weick, K. E. 2003 ‘Theory and practice in the real world’ in The Oxford handbook of organization theory. H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (eds), 453–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
37.
Weick, K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld 1999 ‘Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness’ in Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 21. B. Staw and R. Sutton (eds), 81–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
