This article reviews the potential of Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis as a contribution to organization theory. We consider organization theory to consist of three epistemological foundations, which we label equilibrium-based theory, process-based theory and recursivity-based theory. We review critically Luhmann’s autopoietic theory in relation to each of these three foundations. We suggest that whereas it deviates radically from equilibrium-based theory and deviates significantly from process-based theory, it holds potential in its complementarity with Giddens’s structuration theory in providing a promising basis for recursivity-based organization theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvesson, Mats, and Stan Deetz 1996 ‘Critical theory and postmodern approaches to organizational studies’ in Handbook of organization studies. S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds), 191–217. London: Sage .
2.
Baecker, Dirk 1999 Organisation als System. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp .
3.
Barley, Stephen R. 1986 ‘Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments . Administrative Science Quarterly31: 78–108 .
4.
Barley, Stephen R., and Gideon Kunda 1998 ‘Bringing work back in’ , paper presented at the SCANCOR conference, Stanford University, September 1998.
5.
Barley, Stephen R., and Pamela S. Tolbert 1997 ‘Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between institutions and actions . Organization Studies18/1: 93–117 .
6.
Bartunek, Jean M. 1984 ‘Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order’ . Administrative Science Quarterly29: 355–372 .
7.
Bateson, Gregory 1972 Steps to an ecology of mind. Northwhale, NJ: Jason Aronson .
8.
Beer, Stafford 1980 ‘Preface’ in Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. H. R. Maturana and F. J. Varela. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing .
9.
Bhaskar, Roy 1978 A realist theory of science. Sussex: Harvester Press .
10.
Brunsson, Nils, and Johan P. Olsen 1998 ‘Organization theory: Thirty years of dismantling, and then...?’ in Organizing organizations. N. Brunsson and J. P. Olsen (eds), 7–23. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget .
11.
Burrell, Gibson, and Gareth Morgan 1979 Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot: Gower .
12.
Castells, Manuel 1996 The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell .
13.
Chia, Robert 1998 ‘From complexity science to complex thinking: Organization as simple location’ . Organization5/3: 341–369 .
14.
Clegg, Stewart 1994 ‘Weber and Foucault: Social theory for the study of organization’ . Organization1/1: 149–178 .
15.
Czarniawska, Barbara 2000 ‘Att studera management som skapande och Âterskapande av handlingsn‰t’. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier2/3: 5–24.
16.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell 1983 ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’ . American Sociological Review48: 147–160 .
17.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell 1991 ‘Introduction’ in The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
18.
Donaldson, Lex 1995 For positivist organization theory. London: Sage .
19.
Dooley, Kevin J., and Andrew Van de Ven 1999 ‘Explaining complex organizational dynamics’ . Organization Science10/3: 358–372 .
20.
Gefen, David 2000 ‘E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust’ . Omega28/6: 725–737 .
21.
Giddens, Anthony 1976 New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson .
22.
Giddens, Anthony 1979 Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan .
23.
Giddens, Anthony 1984 The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press .
24.
Giddens, Anthony 1990 The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press .
25.
Goffman, Erving 1959 The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday .
26.
Habermas, Jürgen 1984 The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
27.
Habermas, Jürgen 1987 The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
28.
Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman 1989 Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
29.
Harste, Gorm 2003 ‘The emergence of autopoietic organization’ in Autopoietic organization theory. T. Bakken and T. Hernes (eds), 75–102. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
30.
Harvey, David 1990 The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell .
31.
Hatch, Mary Jo 1997 Organization theory: Modern, postmodern and symbolic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
32.
Hernes, Tor 2003 ‘Organization as evolution of space’ in Northern lights organization theory. B. Czarniawska and G. SÈvon (eds), 267–290. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
33.
Hernes, Tor 2004 The spatial construction of organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press).
34.
Høilund, Holger, and Anders LaCour 2003 ‘Social care: A dilemma of standardization and flexibility in organizational reform’ in Autopoietic organization theory. T. Bakken and T. Hernes (eds), 272–295. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
Katz, Daniel, and Robert L. Kahn 1978 The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley .
37.
Kickert, Walter J. M. 1993 ‘Autopoiesis and the science of (public) administration’ . Organization Studies14/2: 261–274 .
38.
Knights, David 1997 ‘Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and postmodernism revisited’ . Organization Studies18/1: 1–19 .
39.
Knodt, Eva M. 1995 ‘Foreword’ in Social systems. Niklas Luhmann, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
40.
Lawrence, Paul R., and Jay W. Lorsch 1967 Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
41.
Luhmann, Niklas 1964 Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation. Berlin: Duncker and Humbolt .
42.
Luhmann, Niklas 1986 ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’ in Sociocybernetic paradoxes. F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds), 176–193. London: Sage .
43.
Luhmann, Niklas 1992a ‘Organisation’ in Mikropolitik. W. Küpper and G. Ortmann (eds), 165–187. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag .
44.
Luhmann, Niklas 1992b ‘Hvorfor systemteori?’ in Autopoiesis. En introduktion til Niklas Luhmanns verden af systemer. J. C. Jacobsen (ed.), 10–21. Copenhagen: Politisk Revy.
45.
Luhmann, Niklas 1995 Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
46.
Luhmann, Niklas 1996 ‘Complexity, structural contingency and value conflicts’ in Detraditionalization: Critical reflections on authority and identity. P. Heelas, S. Lash and P. Morris (eds), 59–71. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell .
47.
Luhmann, Niklas 1997 Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
48.
Luhmann, Niklas 2000 Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
49.
Luhmann, Niklas, and Karl E. Schorr 1990 Zwischen Anfang und Ende: Fragen an die P‰dagogik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
50.
Lyotard, Jean-FranÁois 1984 The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press .
51.
Manning, Peter K. 1982 Organizational work: Structuration of environments . British Journal of Sociology33/1: 118–134 .
52.
Maturana, Humberto R. 1980 ‘Biology and cognition’ in Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. H. Maturana and F. J. Varela. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing .
53.
Maturana, Humberto R., and Francisco J. Varela 1980 Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing .
54.
Merton, Robert K. 1936 ‘The unintended consequences of purposive social action’ . American Sociological Review, December, 1: 895–904 .
55.
Merton, Robert K. 1949 Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
56.
Mingers, John 1995 Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. London: Plenum Press .
57.
Mingers, John 2003 ‘Observing organizations: An evaluation of Luhmann’s organization theory’ in Autopoietic organization theory. T. Bakken and T. Hernes (eds), 103–122. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
58.
Morgan, Gareth 1986 Images of organization. London: Sage .
59.
Morin, Edgar 1977 La mÈthode. Paris: Les Editions du Seuil .
Ortmann, Günther 1995 Formen der Produktion.Organization und Rekursivit‰t. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
62.
Parsons, Talcott 1951 The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
63.
Parsons, Talcott 1960 Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
64.
Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils 1951 Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
65.
Pfeffer, Geffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik 1978 The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row .
66.
Reed, Michael 1996 ‘Organizational theorizing: A historically contested terrain’ in Handbook of organization studies. S. R Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds), 31–56. London: Sage .
67.
Reed, Michael 1997 ‘In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis’ . Organization Studies18/1: 21–42 .
68.
Riley, Patricia 1983 ‘A structurationist account of political culture’ . Administrative Science Quarterly28: 414–437 .
69.
Schein, Edgar 1985 Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass .
70.
Scott, W. Richard 1995 Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
71.
Scott, W. Richard 1998 Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems, 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
72.
Selznick, Philip 1957 Leadership in administration. Berkeley: University of California Press .
73.
Silverman, David 1970 The theory of organizations: A sociological framework. London: Heinemann .
74.
Simon, Herbert 1976 Administrative behaviour, 3rd edn. New York: The Free Press .
75.
Spencer-Brown, George 1969 Laws of form. London: Allen and Unwin .
76.
Thompson, James D. 1967 Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw Hill .
77.
Thyssen, Ole 2000 Organization og iakttagelse. Handelsh øyskolen København.
78.
Thyssen, Ole 2003 ‘Luhmann and the management’ in Autopoietic organization theory. T. Bakken and T. Hernes (eds), 212–234. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
79.
Tolbert, Pamela, and Lynne Zucker 1996 ‘The institutionalization of institutional theory’ in Handbook of organization studies. S. R Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds), 175–190. London: Sage .
80.
Tsang, Eric W. K., and Kai-man Kwan 1999 ‘Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective’ . Academy of Management Review24/4: 759–780 .
81.
Vanderstraeten, Raf 2000 ‘Autopoiesis and socialization: On Luhmann’s reconceptualization of communication and socialization’ . British Journal of Sociology51/3: 581–598 .
82.
Varela, Francisco J., Humberto R. Maturana, and R. Uribe 1974 ‘Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model’ . BioSystems5: 187–196 .
83.
von Foerster, Heinz 1991 Observing systems. California: Intersystems Publications .
84.
von Foerster, Heinz 1993 ‘Für Niklas Luhmann: Wie rekursiv ist Kommunikation?’. Teoria Sociologica2/1: 61–85.
85.
von Krogh, Georg, and Johan Roos 1995 Organizational epistemology. London: Macmillan .
86.
Weick, Karl E. 1974 ‘Middle range theories of social systems’ . Behavioral Science19: 357–367 .
87.
Weick, Karl E. 1977 ‘Enactment processes in organizations’ in New directions in organizational behaviour. B. Staw and G. R. Salancik (eds), 267–300. Chicago, IL: St. Vlair Press .
88.
Weick, Karl E. 1979 The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. New York: Random House .
89.
Weick, Karl E. 1995 Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
90.
Whitehead, Alfred North 1929 Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Macmillan .
91.
Åkerstrøm Andersen, Niels 2003 ‘The undecidability of decisions’ in Autopoietic organization theory. T. Bakken and T. Hernes (eds), 235–258. Oslo: Liber Abstrakt, Copenhagen Business School Press .
