Most theorizing on the relationship between corporate social/environmental performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) assumes that the current evidence is too fractured or too variable to draw any generalizable conclusions. With this integrative, quantitative study, we intend to show that the mainstream claim that we have little generalizable knowledge about CSP and CFP is built on shaky grounds. Providing a methodologically more rigorous review than previous efforts, we conduct a meta-analysis of 52 studies (which represent the population of prior quantitative inquiry) yielding a total sample size of 33,878 observations. The meta-analytic findings suggest that corporate virtue in the form of social responsibility and, to a lesser extent, environmental responsibility is likely to pay off, although the operationalizations of CSP and CFP also moderate the positive association. For example, CSP appears to be more highly correlated with accounting-based measures of CFP than with market-based indicators, and CSP reputation indices are more highly correlated with CFP than are other indicators of CSP. This meta-analysis establishes a greater degree of certainty with respect to the CSP-CFP relationship than is currently assumed to exist by many business scholars.
* Abbott, Walter F., and Joseph R. Monsen1979‘On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement’. Academy of Management Journal22: 501-515.
2.
Aldag, Ramon J. , and Kathryn M. Bartol1978‘Empirical studies of corporate social performance and policy: A survey of problems and results’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 1, 165-199. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
* Alexander, Gordon J., and Rogene A. Buchholz1978‘Corporate social performance and stock market performance’. Academy of Management Journal21: 479-486.
4.
Amburgey, T. L. , and T. Dacin1994‘As the left foot follows the right? The dynamics of strategic and structural change’. Academy of Management Journal37: 1427-1452.
5.
* Anderson, John C., and Alan W. Frankle1980‘Voluntary social reporting: An isobeta portfolio analysis’. Accounting Review55: 467-479.
6.
Andrews, K. R.1987The concept of corporate strategy, 3rd edn.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
7.
Aupperle, Kenneth E.1984‘An empirical measure of corporate social orientation’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 6, 27-54. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8.
Aupperle, Kenneth E.1991‘The use of forced-choice survey procedures in assessing corporate social orientation’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 269-279. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
* Aupperle, Kenneth E., Archie B. Carroll, and John D. Hatfield1985‘An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability’. Academy of Management Journal28: 446-463.
10.
Barney, Jay1991‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’ . Journal of Management17: 771-792.
11.
Baron, D. P.2000Business and its environment, 3rd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
* Belkaoui, Ahmed1976‘The impact of the disclosure of the environmental effects of organizational behavior on the market’. Financial Management5: 26-31.
13.
* Blackburn, V. L., M. Doran, and C. B. Shrader1994‘Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance’. Journal of Managerial Issues6: 195-212.
14.
* Bowman, Edward H.1976‘Strategy and the weather’. Sloan Management Review17: 49-58.
15.
* Bowman, Edward H.1978‘Strategy, annual reports, and alchemy’. California Management Review20: 64-71.
16.
* Bowman, Edward H., and Mason Haire1975‘A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility’. California Management Review18: 49-58.
17.
* Bragdon, Joseph H., Jr., and John A. T. Marlin1972‘Is pollution profitable?’Risk Management19: 9-18.
18.
* Brown, Brad, and Susan Perry1994‘Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “Most Admired Companies”’. Academy of Management Journal37: 1346-1359.
19.
* Brown, Brad, and Susan Perry1995‘Halo-removed residuals of Fortune’s “responsibility to the community and environment”: A decade of data’. Business & Society34: 199-215.
20.
Business Week1999‘The next bottom line’, Asian edn, 3 May: 45-96.
21.
Carroll, Archie B.1979‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance’ . Academy of Management Review4: 497-506.
22.
Carroll, Archie B.1991‘Corporate social performance measurement: A commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 385-401. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
* Chen, Kung H., and Richard W. Metcalf1980‘The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited’. Accounting Review55: 168-177.
24.
Clarkson, Max B. E.1991‘Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance: The stakeholder management model’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 331-358. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25.
Clarkson, Max B. E.1995‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’ . Academy of Management Review20: 92-117.
26.
* Cochran, Phillip L., and Robert A. Wood1984‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance’. Academy of Management Journal27: 42-56.
27.
Cohen, J.1990‘Things I have learned (so far)’ . American Psychologist45: 1304-1312.
28.
Cohen, J.1994‘The Earth is round (p < .05)’ . American Psychologist49: 997-1003.
29.
* Conine, Thomas E., and Gerald P. Madden1987‘Corporate social responsibility and investment value: The expectational relationship’ in Handbook of business strategy 1986/1987 yearbook. W. D. Guth (ed.), 18-11 to 18-19. Boston, MA: Warren, Gorham, & Lamont.
30.
Cook, Thomas D. , and Donald T. Campbell1979Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
Cooper, Harris M.1989Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews, 2nd edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Cornell, Bradford , and Alan Shapiro1987‘Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance’. Financial Management16: 5-14.
33.
* Cowen, Scott S., Linda B. Ferreri and Lee D. Parker1987‘The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis’. Accounting, Organizations and Society12: 111-122.
34.
Cronbach, Lee J. , Goldine C. Gleser, Harinder Nanda, and Nageswari Rajaratnam1972The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
35.
Dalton, D. R. , C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand1999‘Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis’. Academy of Management Journal42: 674-686.
36.
Damanpour, Fariborz1991‘Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators’ . Academy of Management Journal34: 555-590.
37.
Datta, Deepak K. , George E. Pinches, and V. K. Narayanan1992‘Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta-analysis’. Strategic Management Journal13: 67-84.
38.
* Davidson, Wallace N. III, and Dan L. Worrell1992‘Research notes and communications: The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth’. Strategic Management Journal13: 467-473.
39.
Davis, Keith1973‘The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibilities’ . Academy of Management Journal16: 312-317.
40.
DiMaggio, Paul J. , and Walter W. Powell1983‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review48: 147-160.
41.
Donaldson, Lex1987‘Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defense of contingency theory’ . Journal of Management Studies24: 1-24.
42.
Donaldson, Thomas1999‘Response: Making stakeholder theory whole’ . Academy of Management Review24: 237-241.
43.
Donaldson, Thomas , and Lee E. Preston1995‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review20: 65-91.
44.
* Dooley, Robert S., and Linda D. Lerner1994‘Pollution, profits, and stakeholders: The constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations’. Journal of Business Ethics13: 701-711.
45.
* Fogler, H. Russell, and Fred Nutt1975‘A note on social responsibility and stock valuation’. Academy of Management Journal18: 155-160.
46.
Fombrun, Charles J.1996Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
* Fombrun, Charles, and Mark Shanley1990‘What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’. Academy of Management Journal33: 233-258.
48.
* Freedman, Martin, and Bikki Jaggi1982‘Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance’. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science10: 167-176.
49.
* Freedman, Martin, and Bikki Jaggi1986‘An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors’ decisions’. Advances in Public Interest Accounting1: 192-212.
50.
Freeman, R. Edward1984Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
51.
Freeman, R. Edward , and William M. Evan1990‘Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation’. Journal of Behavioral Economics19/4: 337-359.
52.
Friedman, Milton1970‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’ . New York Times Magazine, 13September: 33ff.
53.
Frooman, Jeff1997‘Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies’ . Business & Society36: 221-249.
54.
Gephardt, Richard P., Jr.1991‘Multiple methods for tracking corporate social performance: Insights from a study of major industrial accidents’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 359-383. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55.
Gooding, Richard Z. , and John A. Wagner, III1985‘A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits’. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 462-481.
56.
* Graves, Samuel B., and Sandra A. Waddock1994‘Institutional owners and corporate social performance’. Academy of Management Journal37: 1034-1046.
57.
* Greening, Daniel W.1995‘Conservation strategies, firm performance, and corporate reputation in the U.S. electric utility industry’ in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Supplement 1, 345-368. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
58.
Greening, D. W. , and D. B. Turban2000‘Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce’. Business & Society39: 254-280.
59.
* Griffin, Jennifer J., and John F. Mahon1997‘The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research’. Business & Society36: 5-31.
60.
* Hansen, Gary S., and Birger Wernerfelt1989‘Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors’. Strategic Management Journal10: 399-411.
61.
Hart, Stuart L.1995‘A natural resource-based view of the firm’ . Academy of Management Review20: 986-1014.
62.
Hedges, Larry V.1987‘How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research’ . American Psychologist42/2: 443-455.
63.
Hedges, Larry V. , and Ingram Olkin1980‘Vote counting methods in research synthesis’. Psychological Bulletin88: 359-369.
64.
* Heinze, David C.1976‘Financial correlates of a social involvement measure’. Akron Business and Economic Review7: 48-51.
65.
* Herremans, Irene M., Parporn Akathaporn and Morris McInnes1993‘An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance’. Accounting, Organizations and Society18: 587-604.
66.
Hill, Charles W. L. , and Thomas M. Jones1992‘Stakeholder-agency theory’. Journal of Management Studies29: 131-154.
67.
Hunt, Morton1997How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
68.
Hunter, John E. , and Frank L. Schmidt1990Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69.
Husted, Brian W.2000‘A contingency theory of corporate social performance’ . Business & Society39: 24-48.
70.
* Ingram, Robert W.1978‘An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures’. Journal of Accounting Research16: 270-285.
71.
* Ingram, Robert W., and Katherine B. Frazier1980‘Environmental performance and corporate disclosure’. Journal of Accounting Research18: 614-622.
72.
* Jacobson, Robert1987‘The validity of ROI as a measure of business performance’ . American Economic Review77: 470-478.
73.
Jones, Thomas M.1995‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics’ . Academy of Management Review20: 404-437.
74.
Jones, Thomas M. , and Andrew C. Wicks1999‘Convergent stakeholder theory’. Academy of Management Review24: 206-221.
75.
Judge, W. Q., Jr.1994‘Correlates of organizational effectiveness: A multilevel analysis of a multidimensional outcome’ . Journal of Business Ethics13: 1-10.
76.
* Kedia, B. L., and E. C. Kuntz1981‘The context of social performance: An empirical study of Texas banks’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 3, 133-154. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77.
Ketchen, David J., Jr. , James G. Combs, Craig J. Russell, Chris Shook, et al.1997‘Organizational configurations and performance’. Academy of Management Journal40: 223-240.
78.
Levitt, T.1958‘The dangers of social responsibility’ . Harvard Business Review, September-October, 36: 38-44.
79.
* Levy, F. K., and G. M. Shatto1980‘Social responsibility in large electric utility firms: The case for philanthropy’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 2, 237-249. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
80.
Light, R. J. , and P. V. Smith1971‘Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies’. Harvard Educational Review41: 429-471.
81.
* Long, William F., and David J. Ravenscraft1984‘The misuse of accounting rates of return: Comment’. American Economic Review74: 494-501.
82.
McGuire, J. B. , T. Schneeweis, and B. Branch1990‘Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance’. Journal of Management16: 167-180.
83.
* McGuire, J. B., Alison Sundgren, and Thomas Schneeweis1988‘Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance’. Academy of Management Journal31: 854-872.
84.
McWilliams, A. , and D. Siegel2000‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?’Strategic Management Journal21: 603-609.
85.
McWilliams, A. , and D. Siegel2001‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’. Academy of Management Review26: 117-127.
86.
Majumdar, Sumit K. , and Alfred A. Marcus2001‘Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulations’. Academy of Management Journal44: 170-179.
87.
* Marcus, Alfred A., and Richard S. Goodman1986‘Compliance and performance: Toward a contingency theory’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 8, 193-221. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
88.
Margolis, J. D. , and J. P. Walsh2001People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
Meyer, Marshall W. , and Vipin Gupta1994‘The performance paradox’. Research in Organizational Behavior16: 309-369.
90.
Mitchell, Ronald K. , Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood1997‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’. Academy of Management Review22: 853-886.
91.
Moskowitz, Milton R.1972‘Choosing socially responsible stocks’ . Business and Society Review1: 71-75.
92.
Moskowitz, Milton R.1975‘Profiles in corporate social responsibility’ . Business and Society Review13: 29-42.
93.
* Newgren, K. E., A. A. Rasher, M. E. LaRoe, and M. R. Szabo1985‘Environmental assessment and corporate performance: A longitudinal analysis using a market-determined performance measure’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 7, 153-164. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
94.
Nunnally, Jum C. , and Ira H. Bernstein1994Psychometric theory, 3rd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
95.
* O’Neill, Hugh M., Charles B. Saunders, and Anne D. McCarthy1989‘Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary?’Journal of Business Ethics8: 353-357.
96.
Orlitzky, Marc 1998 ‘A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance’, dissertation thesis. University of Iowa, UMI.
97.
* Parket, I. Robert, and Henry Eilbirt1975‘Social responsibility: The underlying factors’. Business Horizons18: 5-10.
98.
* Patten, Dennis M.1990‘The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures: The case of the Sullivan Principles signings’. Accounting, Organizations and Society15: 575-587.
99.
* Pava, Moses L., and Joshua Krausz1995Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Westport, CT: Quorum.
100.
Post, James E. (ed.) 1991Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
101.
Preston, Lee E.1978a‘Corporate social performance and policy: A synthetic framework for research and analysis’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. Lee E. Preston (ed.), 1, 1-25. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
102.
* Preston, Lee E.1978b‘Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results’. Journal of Contemporary Business7: 135-150.
103.
Price, James L. , and Charles W. Mueller1986Handbook of organizational measurement, 2nd edn.Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
104.
* Reimann, Bernard C.1975‘Organizational effectiveness and management’s public values: A canonical analysis’. Academy of Management Journal18: 224-241.
105.
* Riahi-Belkaoui, Ahmed1991‘Organizational effectiveness, social performance and economic performance’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 143-153. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
106.
Roberts, Peter W. , and Grahame R. Dowling2002‘Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance’. Strategic Management Journal23: 1077-1093.
107.
* Roberts, Robin W.1992Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory’. Accounting, Organizations and Society17: 595-612.
108.
Roman, R. M. , S. Hayibor, and B. R. Agle1999‘The relationship between social and financial performance: Repainting a portrait’. Business & Society38: 109-125.
Rosenthal, R. , and DiMatteo, M. R.2001‘Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews’. Annual Review of Psychology52: 59-82.
111.
Roth, Philip L. , Craig A. BeVier, Fred S. Switzer, III., and Jeffrey S. Schippmann1996‘Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance’. Journal of Applied Psychology81: 548-557.
112.
Rowley, Timothy J.1997‘Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences’ . Academy of Management Review22: 887-910.
113.
Rowley, Timothy J. , and Shawn Berman2000‘A brand new brand of corporate social performance’. Business & Society39: 397-418.
114.
* Russo, Michael V., and Paul A. Fouts1997‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability’. Academy of Management Journal40: 534-559.
115.
Schmidt, Frank L.1992‘What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology’ . American Psychologist47: 1173-1181.
116.
Schmidt, Frank L. , and John E. Hunter1977‘Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization’. Journal of Applied Psychology62: 529-540.
117.
Schwenk, Charles1989‘A meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry’ . Strategic Management Journal10: 303-306.
118.
* Shane, Phillip B., and Barry H. Spicer1983‘Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm’. Accounting Review58: 521-538.
119.
* Sharfman, Mark1996‘A concurrent validity study of the KLD social performance ratings data’. Journal of Business Ethics15: 287-296.
120.
Shavelson, Richard J. , Noreen M. Webb, and Glenn L. Rowley1989‘Generalizability theory’. American Psychologist44: 922-932.
121.
Shrivastava, Paul1995‘Ecocentric management for a risk society’ . Academy of Management Review20: 118-137.
122.
* Simerly, Roy L.1994‘Corporate social performance and firms’ financial performance: An alternative perspective’. Psychological Reports75: 1091-1103.
123.
* Simerly, Roy L.1995‘Institutional ownership, corporate social performance, and firms’ financial performance’. Psychological Reports77: 515-525.
124.
Smith, M. L. , and G. V. Glass1977‘Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies’. American Psychologist32: 752-760.
125.
* Spencer, Barbara A., and Stephen G. Taylor1987‘A within and between analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance’. Akron Business and Economic Review18: 7-18.
126.
* Spicer, Barry H.1978‘Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study’. Accounting Review53: 94-111.
127.
* Starik, Mark 1990 ‘Stakeholder management and firm performance: Reputation and financial relationships to U.S. electric utility consumer-related strategies’, unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens.
128.
Starik, Mark1995‘Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature’ . Journal of Business Ethics14: 207-217.
129.
* Sturdivant, Frederick D., and James L. Ginter1977‘Corporate social responsiveness: Management attitudes and economic performance’. California Management Review19: 30-39.
130.
Traub, Ross E.1994Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications, Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
131.
* Turban, Daniel B., and Daniel W. Greening1997‘Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees’. Academy of Management Journal40: 658-672.
132.
Ullmann, Arieh1985‘Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance’ . Academy of Management Review10: 540-577.
Venkatraman, N. , and Vasudevan Ramanujam1986‘Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches’. Academy of Management Review11: 801-814.
135.
* Venkatraman, N., and Vasudevan Ramanujam1987‘Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence’. Journal of Management13: 109-122.
136.
* Waddock, Sandra A., and Samuel B. Graves1997‘The corporate social performance-financial performance link’. Strategic Management Journal18: 303-319.
137.
Waddock, Sandra A. , and John F. Mahon1991‘Corporate social performance revisited: Dimensions of efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 231-262). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
138.
Wagner, John A., II. , and Richard Z. Gooding1987‘Effects of societal trends on participation research’. Administrative Science Quarterly32: 241-262.
139.
* Wartick, Stephen L.1988‘How issues management contributes to corporate performance’. Business Forum13: 16-22.
140.
Wartick, Stephen L. , and Phillip L. Cochran1985‘The evolution of the corporate social performance model’. Academy of Management Review10: 758-769.
141.
Webb, Eugene J. , D. Campbell, R. Schwartz, L. Sechrest, and J. Grove1981Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
142.
Wernerfelt, Birger1984‘A resource-based view of the firm’ . Strategic Management Journal5: 171-180.
143.
Wholey, D. R. , and J. W. Brittain1986‘Organizational ecology: Findings and implications’. Academy of Management Review11: 513-533.
144.
Willums, Jan-Olaf1999‘Social responsibility and shareholder value’ . Business Week(Asian Edition), 3May: 85.
145.
* Wiseman, Joanne1982‘An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports’. Accounting, Organizations and Society7: 53-63.
146.
Wokutch, Richard E. , and E. W. McKinney1991‘Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 309-330. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
147.
* Wokutch, Richard E., and Barbara A. Spencer1987‘Corporate sinners and saints: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance’. California Management Review29: 62-77.
148.
* Wolfe, Robert1991‘The use of content analysis to assess corporate social responsibility’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 281-307. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
149.
Wolfe, Robert , and Kenneth E. Aupperle1991‘Introduction’ in Research in corporate social performance and policy. James E. Post (ed.), 12, 265-268. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
150.
Wood, Donna J.1991a‘Corporate social performance revisited’ . Academy of Management Review16: 691-718.
151.
Wood, Donna J.1991b‘Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance’ . Journal of Management17: 383-406.
152.
Wood, Donna J.1995‘The Fortune database as a CSP measure’ . Business & Society34: 197-198.
153.
Wood, Donna J. , and Raymond E. Jones1995‘Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance’. International Journal of Organizational Analysis3: 229-267.
