Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-9
Exploring Sustainable Publishing Practices in the Publishing Industry of Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study in the Context of the Fifth Industrial Revolution
The study explores how the publishing industry in Bangladesh adopts principles from the Fifth Industrial Revolution (5IR) and sustainable publishing practices through the analysis of the 6R principles (Recognize, Reconsider, Realize, Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle) along with human-machine collaboration and remote work practices. The study used Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory and interviewed 30 publishers chosen specifically for analysis. Results indicate that the respondents demonstrated a lack of understanding of 5IR concepts and sustainability principles and demonstrated insufficient adoption of these approaches. The main obstacles facing this industry stem from insufficient technological capabilities, insufficient professional workers and little sustainable development understanding. Several publishers see the benefits of technological integration combined with remote work but many stick to manual methods thus hindering their advancement. The research highlights an immediate requirement for capacity development initiatives that can strengthen business capabilities to use 5IR technologies as well as sustainable methods. The publishing industry can advance toward innovation and sustainability by promoting awareness, embracing human-machine collaboration, and adopting the 6R principles.
AndersonK. (2023, January13). The six RS of sustainability: What are they?Greenly. https://greenly.earth/en-gb/blog/company-guide/the-six-rs-of-sustainability-what-are-they
2.
AshtonT. S. (1948). The industrial revolution, 1760-1830. Oxford University Press. http://archive.org/details/industrialrevolu0000asht
3.
BenoM. (2018). Work flexibility, telepresence in the office for remote workers: A case study from Austria. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 19–31). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03014-8_2
4.
BergB. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Inc.
5.
BergB. L., & LuneH. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
6.
BhuniaC. T., & OnimeC. (2007). Digital divide and digital opportunity: Comparison, analysis and strategies for sustainable development in developing nations. The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/39/090/39090564.pdf
7.
BoyceC., & NealeP. R. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301
8.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
9.
BrequeM., De NulL., & PetridisA. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Retrieved, November26, 2021, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/468a892a-5097-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1/
10.
BrimacombeT., & SkuseA. (2013). Gender, ICTs, and indicators: Measuring inequality and change. Gender, Technology and Development, 17(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852413488713
11.
BritannicaT.Editors of Encyclopaedia (2024, April5). Industrial Revolution. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Industrial-Revolution
12.
ChakladerS., AlamJ., IslamM., & SabbirA. S. (2013). Bridging digital divide: ‘Village wireless LAN’, a low cost network infrastructure solution for digital communication, information dissemination & education in rural Bangladesh. 2013 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1109/icaee.2013.6750347
13.
CharmazK. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundation. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 976–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266795
14.
ChoudhuryP., ForoughiC., & LarsonB. (2019). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3494473
15.
CrouchM., & McKenzieH. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
16.
DaiM., SunM., ChenB., ShiL., JinM., ManY., LiangZ., De AlmeidaC. M. V. B., LiJ., ZhangP., ChiuA. S. F., XuM., YuH., MengJ., & WangY. (2023). Country-specific net-zero strategies of the pulp and paper industry. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06962-0
17.
DalyJ., KellehearA., & GliksmanM. (1997). The public health researcher. Oxford University Press.
18.
Del RioD. D. F., SovacoolB. K., GriffithsS., BazilianM., KimJ., FoleyA. M., & RooneyD. (2022). Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112706
19.
DoneR., WarnerR., & NoordaR. (2022). Publishing distribution practices: New insights about eco-friendly publishing, sustainable printing and returns, and cost-effective delivery in the U.S. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(2), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09882-5
20.
DonovanJ. J. (1997). The second industrial revolution. Prentice Hall. http://archive.org/details/secondindustrial00dono
21.
FremdlingR. (1996). Industrial revolution and scientific and technological progress (Research Memorandum GD-30). University of Groningen. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/3242838/gd30.pdf
22.
GadsbyO., BarsleyZ. C., HodgsonC., & DavidsonS. (2024). Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem. Learned Publishing, 37(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1644
23.
GibsonR. (2014). Four strategies for remote workforce training, development, and certification. In Advances in business information systems and analytics book series (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5137-1.ch001
24.
Government of Bangladesh. (2020). National skills development policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://nsda.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/nsda.portal.gov.bd/npfblock/2020-12-21-14-24-8c85b4482cf8516df94dd6471eaf30a4.pdf
25.
GrabowskaS., SaniukS., & GajdzikB. (2022). Industry 5.0: Improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics, 127(6), 3117–3144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04370-1
26.
GreenJ., & ThorogoodN. (2009). Qualitative methods for health research. Choice Reviews Online, 47(02), 1–440. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-0901
27.
GroumposP. P. (2021). A critical historical and scientific overview of all industrial revolutions. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(13), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.492
28.
HasanR., HossainM. S., & HaqueM. M. (2022). Developing a Sustainable digital transformation framework for the continuum of primary to tertiary education in Bangladesh: A secondary data and document analysis approach. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.1777
29.
HenninkM., & KaiserB. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
30.
HobsbawmE. J. (1990). Industry and empire: From 1750 to the present day. Penguin Books.
31.
HoukanA., SahooA.K., & NayakS. (2023). Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development in the Developing World. 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation (SEFET), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeFeT57834.2023.10245935
32.
IqbalM., MaJ., AhmadN., HussainK., UsmaniM. S., & AhmadM. (2021). Sustainable construction through energy management practices in developing economies: An analysis of barriers in the construction sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(26), 34793–34823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12917-7
33.
IvaldiS., ScarattiG., & FregnanE. (2022). Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: Organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2020-0127
34.
JoffeH. (2012). Thematic analysis. In HarperD. & ThompsonA. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–223). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch15
35.
JooH.-Y., & SuhH. (2017). The effects of government support on corporate performance hedging against International Environmental Regulation. Sustainability, 9(11), 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111980
36.
KaplanD. (2019, May24). Book publishers go green to reduce their carbon footprint. Green Matters. https://www.greenmatters.com/news/2017/09/15/1vvQRq/publishing-sustainable
KongelaS. M. (2021). Sustainability potential awareness among built environment stakeholders: Experience from Tanzania. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-09-2020-0082
39.
Kunak Technologies S.L. (2024, May10). Environmental impact of the paper industry, from pollution to solution. Kunak. https://kunakair.com/environmental-impact-paper-industry/
40.
LillerS. (2024, February28). Pathways and opportunities for accelerating Agenda 2030 and SDG achievement in Bangladesh. The Daily Star. Retrieved, October4, 2024, from https://www.thedailystar.net/anniversary-supplement-2024/readying-the-next-big-leap/news/pathways-and-opportunities-accelerating-agenda-2030-and-sdg-achievement-bangladesh-3554301.
41.
MaddikuntaP. K. R., PhamQ.-V., BP., DeepaN., DevK., GadekalluT. R., RubyR., & LiyanageM. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26, 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
42.
MahiriF., NajouaA., SoudaS. B., & AminiN. (2023). From industry 4.0 to industry 5.0: The transition to human centricity and collaborative hybrid intelligence. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.4.8
43.
MobergÅ., BorggrenC., & FinnvedenG. (2011). Books from an environmental perspective—Part 2: e-books as an alternative to paper books. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0255-0
44.
MullenP. D., & ReynoldsR. (1978). The potential of grounded theory for health education research: Linking theory and practice. Health Education Monographs, 6(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817800600302
45.
MuniraS., & AhsanW. B. (2024). E-reading adoption and digital literacy in rural Bangladesh: Overcoming barriers and improving educational outcomes. Userhub. https://doi.org/10.58947/journal.rkmd65
46.
NandyD., & RahamanA. (2024, January27). Banglabazar: All things book. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/weekend-read/news/banglabazar-all-things-book-3529221
47.
NobleS. M., MendeM., GrewalD., & ParasuramanA. (2022). The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How Harmonious Human–machine collaboration is triggering a retail and service [r]evolution. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.003
48.
Norrick-RühlC., & VogelA. (2013). Green publishing in Germany: A passing trend or a true transition?Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(3), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-013-9321-8
49.
ÖzdemirV., & HekimN. (2018). Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence, “the internet of things” and next-generation technology policy. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0194
50.
PP., AlagesanM., & RamyaV. (2024). Inkless imprints: The shifting landscape of literature and eco-conscious Digital Publishing. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1134
51.
PortnovaT. (2024). Methods of environmental protection in digital transformation in Russia, Poland and Germany. BIO Web of Conferences, 130, 08017. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413008017
52.
Raja SanthiA., & MuthuswamyP. (2023). Industry 5.0 or industry 4.0S? Introduction to industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective industry 5.0 technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(2), 947–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8
53.
RanaM. S., DasS., ShikderS., AhmadS., & Chandigarh University. (2023). Industry 5.0: Sustainable development in Bangladesh. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 8(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.33564/IJEAST.2023.v08i01.018
54.
RijwaniT., KumariS., SrinivasR., AbhishekK., IyerG., VaraH., DubeyS., RevathiV., & GuptaM. (2024). Industry 5.0: A review of emerging trends and transformative technologies in the next Industrial Revolution. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01943-7
55.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
56.
Rupeika-ApogaR., & PetrovskaK. (2022). Barriers to sustainable digital transformation in micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises. Sustainability, 14(20), 13558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013558
57.
RusuL., BalasuriyaP. B., & BahO. (2020). Cultural barriers in digital transformation in a public Organization: A case study of a Sri Lankan organization. In Lecture notes in business information processing (pp. 640–656). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_43
58.
RyanG. W., & BernardH. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769–802). Sage Publication.
59.
SakeerthiS., & Ramesh KumarM. (2021). Impact of work from home environment on employees’ psychological well-being. SPAST Abstracts, 1(01). Retrieved, from https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/2284
60.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(4), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.477018041
61.
SchwabK. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Publishing Group.
62.
ShahN. (2023). Technology adoption in food supply chain management in developing countries: A review. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 12(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.c3961.0212323
63.
SinghT., SinghD., SinghC. D., & SinghK. (2023). Industry 5.0. In Factories of the Future (pp. 21–45). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119865216.ch2
64.
SyedR., BandaraW., & EdenR. (2022). Public sector digital transformation barriers: A developing country experience. Information Polity, 28(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-220017
65.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
66.
TianX., & MartinB. (2012). Business model sustainability in book publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-012-9258-3
67.
UllahM. S. (2020). ICTs, power prejudice and empowerment: Digital exclusion of the poor in rural Bangladesh. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research—A Palgrave and IAMCR Series, 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32706-4_6
68.
ValenducG., & VendraminP. (2001). Telework: from distance working to new forms of flexible work organisation. Transfer European Review of Labour and Research, 7(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890100700208
69.
Van Der PollJ. A. (2022). Problematizing the adoption of formal methods in the 4IR–5IR transition. Applied System Innovation, 5(6), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060127
70.
World Wildlife Fund. (May19, 2014). Pulp and paper. Retrieved, October6, 2024, from https://www.worldwildlife.org/industries/pulp-and-paper
71.
YanJ., & FengC. (2013). Erratum to: Sustainable design-oriented product modularity combined with 6R concept: A case study of rotor laboratory bench. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(1), 111–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0602-x
72.
ZiatdinovR., AtterayaM. S., & NabiyevR. (2024). The Fifth Industrial Revolution as a transformative step towards society 5.0. Societies, 14(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14020019
