In this article we explore some aspects of contemporary unfree labor in rural south India. We draw on 130 case studies and (informally) extensive field research. We do so in order to make the central point that the conditions of unfreedom are variable and subject to change but that the basic vulnerabilities are significant. Being unfree in a labor relationship is a contingent effect of a set of factors. We stress the role of (a) entrapment of laborers, (b) immiseration within bondage, and (c) barriers to exit from the labor contract. In explanations, structural factors are also important. The article forms a basis for further empirical research in a variety of global settings even beyond India.
Anon. (2007). India’s cotton fields: Over 4 lakh bonded labourers. Retrieved October2007, from http://www.rediff.com//money/2007/sep/29cotton.htm
2.
Anti-Slavery International. (2005). Information on India: Compliance with ILO convention No. 29 on forced labour (ratified in 1954).
3.
ArcherM. (1996). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AthreyaB. V.DjurfeldtG.LindbergS. (1990). Barriers broken: Production relations and agrarian change in Tamil Nadu. New Delhi: SAGE.
5.
BanerjeeA. V.GertlerPaul, J.GhatakMaitreesh, (2002). Empowerment and efficiency: Tenancy reform in West Bengal. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 239–280.
6.
BasuA. K.ChauN. H. (2003). Targeting child labor in debt bondage: Evidence, theory, and policy implications. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(2), 255–281.
7.
BrassT. (1995). Unfree labour and agrarian change: A different view. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(13), 697–699.
8.
BrassT. (2008). Capitalism and bonded labour in India: Reinterpreting recent (re-) interpretations. Journal of Peasant Studies, 35(2), 2.
9.
BremanJ. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India’s informal economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BremanJ. (1999). Industrial Labour in post-colonial India – I: Industrializing the economy and formalizing the economy. International Review of Social History, 44(2).
11.
BremanJ. (2003). The labouring poor in India: Patterns of exploitation, subordination, and exclusion. Delhi, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BremanJ. (2007). Labour bondage in West India: From past to present. New Delhi, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BremanJanGuérinI.PrakashA., (Eds) (2009). India’s unfree workforce: Of bondage old and new. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
ByrneD.RaginC. (Eds) (2009). Handbook of case-centred research, London: Sage.
15.
DaCortaL.DavuluriVenkateswarlu (1999). Unfree Relations and the Feminisation of Agricultural Labour in Andhra Pradesh, 1970–95. Journal of Peasant Studies, 26(2–3), 73–139.
16.
FevreR. (2003). The new sociology of economic behaviour. London: SAGE.
17.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FolbreN. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. London: Routledge.
19.
GenicotG. (2002). Bonded labor and serfdom: A paradox of voluntary choice. Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 101–127.
20.
GidwaniV. (2001). The cultural logic of work: Explaining labour deployment and piece-rate contracts in Matar Taluka, Gujarat. Journal of Development Studies, 38(2), 57–74, 75–108.
21.
GimenezM. (1999). For structure: A critique of ontological individualism. Alethia, 2(2), 19–25.
22.
Government of India, & United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime. (2008). Standard operating procedures (SOP) on investigation of crimes of trafficking for forced labour. Retrieved 2009, from http://www.unodc.org/pdf/india/SOP_Investigation_Forced_Labour.pdf
23.
GuérinIsabelle (2013). Bonded labour, agrarian changes and capitalism: Emerging patterns in south India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 405–423, DOI: 10.1111/joac.12029
24.
HayC. (1995). Structure and agency. In StokerGerryMarshDavid (Eds), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 189-206). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HeilJ. (2003). Levels of reality. Ratio (new series), XVI(3), 204–221.
26.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Human Rights Watch (1999). Broken People. New York: Human Right Watch.
28.
ILO. (2005). A global alliance against forced labour: Global report under the follow-up to the ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work 2005. Geneva: ILO.
29.
ILO. (2012a). Global estimate of forced labour: Results and methodology. Geneva: ILO.
30.
ILO. (2012b). A global alliance against forced labour and traffic in persons: Key achievements of the ILO’s special action programme to combat forced labour 2001–2011. Geneva: ILO.
31.
ILO (2012c). Global estimate of forced labour: Executive summary. Geneva: ILO.
32.
KapadiaK. (1996). Discipline and control: Labour contracts and female labour. In RobbP. G. (Ed.), Meanings of agriculture: Essays in S. Asian history and economics (pp. 262–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
LercheJ. (2007). A Global Alliance Against Forced Labour? ? Unfree Labour, Neo-Liberal Globalization and the International Labour Organization. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(4), 425–452.
34.
MacIntyreA. (1985 [1981]). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth Publishers.
35.
MorganJ.OlsenW. (2007). Defining objectivity in realist terms: Objectivity as a second-order “Bridging” concept. Journal of Critical Realism, 6(2), 250–266.
36.
MorganJ.OlsenW. (2010). Clarifying the fluidity of rules. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 424–454.
37.
MorganJ.OlsenW. (2014). Forced and unfree labour: An analysis. International Critical Thought, 4(1), 21–37.
38.
NelsonJ. A. (1995). Feminism, objectivity and economics. London: Routledge.
39.
NelsonJ. A. (1998). One sphere or two?The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(10), 1467.
40.
NelsonJ. A. (2003). Once more, with feeling: Feminist economics and the ontological question. Feminist Economics, 9(1), 109–118.
41.
OlsenW. K. (1998). Marxist and neo-classical approaches to unfree labour in India. In BrassT.Van der LindenM. (Eds), Free and unfree labour: The debate continues (pp. 379–404). Bern, Berlin & NY: Peter Lang.
42.
OlsenW. K. (2007). Pluralist methodology for development economics: The example of moral economy of Indian labour markets. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(1), 57–82.
43.
OlsenW. K. (2009). Beyond sociology: Structure, agency, and strategy among tenants in India. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37, 366–390.
44.
OlsenW.MorganJ. (2010). Aspiration problems in Indian micro-finance: A case study exploration. Journal of Developing Societies, 26(4), 415–454.
45.
OlsenW. K.NeffD. (2007). Informal agricultural work, habitus and practices in an Indian context (Working Paper No. 79). Global Poverty Research Group, www.gprg.org
46.
OlsenW. K.RamanamurthyR. V. (2000). Contract labour and bondage in Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Social and Political Thought, 1(2), online www.yorku.ca/jspot/2/wkolsenrvramana.htm
47.
PicheritD. (2009). Workers, trust us! Chapter 10 in Breman, Guérin, & Prakash, (Eds), Labour middlemen and the rise of the lower castes in Andhra Pradesh (pp. 259–283). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
48.
RamachandranV. K. (1990). Wage labour and unfreedom in agriculture: An Indian case study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49.
RamamurthyPriti (2000). The cotton commodity chain, women, work and agency in India and Japan: The case for feminist agro-food systems research. World Development, 28(3), 551–578.
50.
RammohanC. (1987). Palamuuru labour (Telugu). Hyderabad: VIRASAM (Revolutionary Writers Association).
51.
RaoUsha (1994). Palamoor labour: A study of migrant labour in mahabubnagar district. C. D. Deshmukh Impact Centre, Council For Social Development: Hyderabad.
52.
RaoR. S. (1995). Towards understanding semi-feudal semi-colonial society. Series title: Hyderabad: Perspectives Press. In ReddyD. Narasimha (Ed.), Studies in political economy. Department of Economics, University of Hyderabad Hyderabad: Perspectives Press.
53.
RavinderA. (1989). Labour migration: A dimension of poverty. Unpublished M.Phil. thesis, Department of Economics, Osmania University, Hyderabad.
54.
ReddyBhimOlsenW. K. (2010). Adaptation of the rural working class in India: A case study of migrant workers. In ClarkD. (Ed.), Adaptation in development. London: submitted to Oxford University Press. Available from the authors.
55.
ReddyD. Narasimha. (1990). Rural migrant labour in Andhra Pradesh. Report submitted to the National Commission on Rural Labour, Government of India.
56.
RoeschM.VenkatasubramanianG.GuérinI. (2009). Bonded labour in the rice mills: Fate or opportunity? In BremanJ.GuérinI.PrakashA. (Eds), India’s unfree workforce: Old and new practices of labour bondage (pp. 285–311). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
57.
RogalyB. (1997). Embedded markets: Hired labour arrangements in West Bengal agriculture. Oxford Development Studies, 25(1), 209–223.
58.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science. London: Routledge.
59.
SayerA. (2000a). Realism and social science. London: SAGE Publications.
60.
SayerA. (2000b). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61, 79–103.
61.
SayerA. (2001). For a critical cultural political economy. Antipode, 33(4), 687–708.
62.
SayerA. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SinghM. (1995). Uneven development in agriculture and labour migration: A case of Bihar and Punjab. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
64.
SrivastavaR. S. (2009). Conceptualizing continuity and change in emerging forms of labour bondage in India. In BremanJ.GuérinI.PrakashA. (Eds), India’s unfree workforce: Of bondage old and new. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
65.
UpadhyayK. (2006). Bonded labour in South Asia: India, Nepal and Pakistan. In Van Den AnkerC. (Ed.), The political economy of new slavery. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
Van Den AnkerC. (Ed.) (2004). The political economy of new slavery. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
VeblenT. (1970 [1899]). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. London: Allen and Unwin.
68.
VeblenT. B. (1914). The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. New York: Macmillan Co.
69.
VenkateswarluDavuluri (2003a). Child labour and trans-national seed companies in hybrid cottonseed production in Andhra Pradesh. Study commissioned by India Committee of the Netherlands. For full text see Retrieved April2009http://www.indianet.nl/cotseed.html
70.
VenkateswarluDavuluri (2003b). Seeds of bondage: Female child bonded labour in hybrid cottonseed production in Andhra Pradesh. Published by Business and Community Foundation and Plan International (India Chapter) New Delhi. Retrieved April2009, from http://www.indianet.nl/sob.html
71.
VenkateswarluDavulurida CortaL. (2001). Transformations in age and gender of unfree workers on hybrid cottonseed farms in Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(3), 1–36, 3.
72.
VenkateshwarluK. (2007). Over 4 lakh children work in cotton seed farms. Retrieved October2007, from http://www.hinduonnet.com/2007/10/01/stories/2007100155400700.htm
