For a long time it was held that a close link existed between the modernization of a society and the secularization of the population. Consequently, it was argued that the influence of religion declined in post-enlightenment society. Opposed to the modernization–secularization paradigm is the view that the influence of religion in the public sphere has not declined, but in fact, has increased. Nowadays religion has emerged as a powerful influence in the public sphere all over the world. This is particularly so, in India. Globalization, in all its various meanings, represents more continuity than discontinuity with processes originating in various phases of modernization. The significance of religion in public sphere in traditional and modern India no doubt differs qualitatively but it is always a part of public sphere. This study reveals that in modern India religion may be a separate domain but it is there forever.
AlexanderJeffrey C.GiesenBernhardMastJason L. (2006). Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlunJones, Robert. (1986). Emile Durkheim: An introduction to four major works. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
3.
AndreskiS. (1972). Herbert Spencer: Structure, function and evolution. London: T. Nelson.
4.
AsadTalal. (2003). Formations of the secular, Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
BarthFredrik. (1961). Nomads of South Persia: The Basseri tribe of the Khamseh confederacy. Universitetets Etnografiske Museum. Bulletin, 8. Oslo: Universitetets Etnografiske Museum.
6.
BeckfordJames. (2003). Social theory and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BellCatherine M. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BellCatherine M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BellDaniel. (1978). The return of the sacred: The argument about the future of religion. Zygon, 13(3), 187–208.
10.
BergerPeter. (1969a). The social reality of religion. London: Faber and Faber.
11.
BergerPeter. (1969b). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12.
BergerPeter. (Ed). (1999) [1960]. The Desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Washington: Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Company.
13.
BurawoyMichael. (1991). Ethnography unbound. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
CasanovaJose. (1994). Public religion in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ComteAuguste. (2000). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. Kitchener: Bataoche Books.
17.
DurkheimE. (1976) [1915]. The elementary forms of the religious life. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
18.
FreudSigmund. (1927). The Future of an Illusion. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXI (1927–1931): The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and its Discontents, and Other Works (pp. 1–56). London: The Hogarth Press.
19.
GellnerErnest. (1974). Legitimation of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GrimesRonald L. (1996). Readings in ritual studies. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
21.
HabermasJurgen. (1969, 28April). Lezter Versuch. Der Spiegel.
22.
HabermasJurgen. (2002). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, God, and modernity. The MIT Press.
23.
HabermasJurgen. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.
24.
HolyoakeGeorge. J. (1896) [1846]. Origin and nature of secularism. London: Watts & Co.
25.
JuergensmeyerMark. (2000). Terror on the mind of god. The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
KapsteinMatthew K. (2005). The Buddhist refusal to theism. Diogenes, 52(1), 13–20.
27.
LuhmannNiklas. (1984). Religious dogmatics and the evolution of society. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
28.
MartinDavid. (2002). Pentecostalism: The world their parish. Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
MarxKarl. (1970) [1843]. Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich. (1969) [1848]. The communist manifesto. Marx/Engels Selected Works, Vol. I (pp. 98–137). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
31.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination (reprinted 2000). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
ReaderIan. (1991). Religion in contemporary Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
33.
SmithGraeme. (2008). A short history of secularism. London: I. B. Tauris
34.
SpencerHerbert. (1900). The Principles of Sociology, New York: D. Appelton and Company.
35.
StarkR.FinkeG. (2000). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique to the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester.
36.
TurnerVictor. (1972). Passages, margins and, poverty: Religious symbols of communitas, Parts I & II. Worship, 46, 390–412; 482–494.
37.
van GennepArnold. (1960) [1908]. The rites of passage, London: Routledge.
38.
WeberMax. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Los Angeles: Roxbury Company.
39.
WilsonBryan. (1966). Religion in secular society. London: Watts.
40.
WilsonBryan. (1976). Contemporary transformations of religion. London: Oxford University Press.
