An Economic Analysis of Agricultural Production in Senegal: A Case Study of the Thiès and Diourbel Regions

Abstract

Enterprise budgets and linear programming techniques are used to determine the profitability of individual crops and optimal cropping patterns for typical farms located in Diourbel and Thiès, two regions in the center of the Senegalese Peanut Basin. An intensification analysis through the introduction of La Fleur 11, which is a relatively new ground-nut seed variety, and operating capital constraints are also included in this study. Finally, farm income is compared with two poverty line measures.

The profitability results show that groundnut exhibits the highest gross returns and net profits per hectare and millet the lowest net profits per hectare. Moreover, La Fleur 11 exhibits a higher yield when compared to traditional groundnut varieties such as 55-437. The results of the linear programming model suggest that groundnut production is the most profitable use of agricultural land in Diourbel, while in Thiès sorghum shows the highest profitability. Excess labor is found in all the cases examined while the opportunity cost of land ranges from FCFA 25,551 to FCFA 318,612 (US $39.31 to US $490.17, at an exchange rate of FCFA 650/US $1 for 1997). The farm income analysis indicates that the level of poverty is severe in the area of the study. In addition, large farms are not as poor as small farms, and non-farm income could contribute to poverty alleviation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Admassie, A. and J.K. Debenvra . 1999. “Sources of Efficiency Differentials in Small-holder Agriculture.” Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 38 .

Ba, A. 1998. Les Réponses et les Défis de la Recherche Agricole Face aux Difficultés de l’Agriculture Sénégalaise: Cas de l’Arachide. (Responses and Challenges of Agricultural Research to the Difficulties Facing Senegalese Agriculture: The Case of Groundnut). Développement Rural et Décentralisation au Sénégal . Proceedings of a Conference at the Ecole Nationale d’Economie Appliquée, March 1998, Dakar, Senegal.

Bravo-Ureta, B.E. , A. Thiam , A. Sow , and A. Cisse . 1997. “Yield Comparisons of Two Groundnut Varieties: Farm Level Evidence From Senegal.” International Arachis Newsletter 17 .

Boserup, E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. London: Allen and Unwin .

Cisse A. 2000. “An Economic Analysis of Agricultural Production in Senegal: A Case Study of the Thiès and Diourbel Regions.” M.S. Thesis, Agricultural and Resource Economics. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

Crawford, E.W. and T. Reardon . 1999. “Determinants of Fertilizer Adoption by African Farmers: Policy Analysis Framework, Illustrative Evidence, and Implications.” Paper No. 99-18, MSU Dept. of Ag. Econ. Staff.

Dancette, C. 1998. La Diversification des Systèmes Irrigués, une des Réponses de la Recherche face aux Difficultés de l’Agriculture Sénégalaise: Cas de l’Arachide Fleur 11. (Diversification of Irrigation Systems, One of the Solutions of Research to the Difficulties Facing Senegalese Agriculture: The Case of La Fleur 11). Développement Rural et Décentralisation au Sénégal . Proceedings of a Conference at the Ecole Nationale d’Economie Appliquée, March 1998, Dakar, Senegal.

Diagana, B. and V. Kelly . 1996. La Dévaluation du Franc CFA: Quelles Perspectives pour une Intensification Durable de la Production Agricole dans le Bassin Arachidier du Sénégal? (Will the CFA Franc Devaluation Enhance Sustainable Agricultural Intensification in the Senegalese Peanut Basin?). Food Security II Cooperative Agreement Policy Syntheses, number 9F.

Duruflé, G. 1994. Le Senegal Peut Il Sortir de la Crise? Douze Ans d’Ajustement Structurel au Sénégal. (Can Senegal Get Out of the Crisis?). Paris: Karthala .

10.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 1998. “Special Report, Fao/Wfp Crop And Food Supply Assessment. Mission To Ethiopia”. 21 December 1998.

11.

Freud, C. , E.H. Freud , and P. Thenevin . 1997. La Crise de l’Arachide au Sénégal: Un Bilan-diagnostic. (The Peanut Crisis in Senegal: A Diagnostic Assessment). CIRAD, January.

12.

Fueglein, H.V. , and Boris E. Bravo-Ureta . 1986. “A Linear Programming Analysis of Economies of Size and Profitability in Vegetable Production.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 15 (2) (October).

13.

Gaye, M. and V. Kelly . 1996. L’utilisation des Terres Agricoles dans le Bassin Arachidier du Sénégal: Facteurs Déterminants des Combinaisons Culturales et des Systèmes de Rotation. (The Use of Agricultural Lands in the Senegalese Peanut Basin: Determinant Factors in Crop Combinations and Rotation Systems.) Staff Paper No. 96-32. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

14.

Gaye, M. , M. Sene , and V. Kelly . 1996. Les Pratiques Paysannes Face aux Contraintes de Productivité: Cas du Semis de l’arachide au Sénégal. (Farmers’ Practices in the Face of Productivity Constraints: The Case of Peanut in Senegal.) Staff Paper No. 96-29. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI .

15.

Gaye, M. 1998. L’Economie Arachidiere Sénégalaise Face à la Libéralisation. (Liberalization and the Senegalese Peanut Economy.) Développement Rural et Décentralisation au Sénégal . Proceedings of a Conference at the Ecole Nationale d’Economie Appliquée, March 1998, Dakar, Senegal.

16.

Jammeh, S.C. 1987. “Politics of Agricultural Price Decision-Marketing in Senegal.” Pp. 223-224 in The Political Economy of Risk and Choice in Senegal, edited by M. Gersovitz and J. Waterbury. London: Frank Cass .

17.

Martin, F. 1991. Budgets De Culture au Sénégal - Rapport de Synthèse. (Crop Budgets in Senegal - Summary Report.) Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Michigan State University. Dakar, Senegal .

18.

Reardon, T. , T. Crawford , V. Kelly , and B. Diagana . 1995. “Promoting Farm Investment for Sustainable Intensification of African Agriculture.” International Paper No. 18, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

19.

Reardon, T. , V. Kelly , T. Crawford et al. 1996. “Determinants of Farm Productivity in Africa: A Synthesis of Four Case Studies.” International Paper No. 22, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

20.

Sow, A. 1998. Comportement des Variétés d’Arachide 55-437 et Fleur 11 dans la Zone de Tassette-Wolof, Département de Thiès: Contribution de l’ENEA. (Performance of Peanut Varieties 55-437 and La Fleur 11 in the Tassette Zone, Thiès Department: ENEA Contribution.) Développement Rural et Décentralisation au Sénégal . Proceedings of a Conference at the Ecole Nationale d’Economie Appliquée, March 1998, Dakar, Senegal.

21.

World Bank 1998. “Poverty Reduction and the World Bank: Progress in Fiscal 1996 and 1997.” (www.worldbank.org/poverty/library/progr/1996-97/).