The policies followed by patrimonial states generally involve playing one group
against another and are inimical to long-run growth. Social cohesion or closure
among rural groups (tenants, part-owners, etc.) provides a mechanism by which the
governing elite are likely to find increased opportunities to behave in a
developmental way. More strongly, this rural cohesion or closure often compels them
to behave in a developmental manner. Such closure is most likely to result from
broad based rural development resulting in the creation of extensive social networks
via the operation of intermediaries. The prewar experiences of Japan and Korea with
land reform are used to illustrate the argument.
Axelrod, Robert
. 1997. “The Dissemination of Cultures: A Model
with Local Convergence and Global Polarization”. Pp.
145-180 in The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent Based
Models of Collaboration, edited by
Robert Axelrod
.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
2.
Ban, Sung Hwan
. 1977. “Agricultural Growth in Korea,
1918-1971”. Pp.90-116 in Aricultural
Growth in Japan, Korea, and the Philippines, edited by
Yujiro Hayami
,
Vernon Ruttan
, and
Herman Southworth
.
West Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press
.
3.
Burkett, John P.
,
Catherine Humblet
, and
Louis Putterman
. 1999.
“Preindustrial and Postwar Economic Development: Is There a Link?”Economic Development and Cultural Change47:
471-495
.
4.
Calder, Kent
. 1988. Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political
Stability in Japan, 1949-1986.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
5.
Chanda, Areendam and Louis Putterman. 1999. “The Capacity for
Growth: Society’s Capital.” Working Paper, Brown University.
6.
Coleman, J.1988.
“Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”
. American Journal of Sociology94:
95-120
.
7.
Engerman, Stanley and Kenneth Sokoloff. 1994. “Factor Endowments,
Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View
From Economic Historians of the United States.” NBER Working Paper Series
on Historical Factors in Long-Run Growth, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
8.
Evans, Peter
. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial
Transformation.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
9.
Geddes, Barbara
. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State
Capacity in Latin America.
Berkeley, California: University of California
.
10.
Hanley, Susan B.
and
Kozo Yamamura
. 1972. Economic and Demographic Change in Preindustrial
Japan, 1600-1868.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
11.
Hauser, W.R.1974. Economic and Institutional Change in Tokugawa Japan: Osaka and
the Kinai Cotton Trade.
London: Cambridge University Press
.
12.
Hayami, Yujiro
and
Vernon Ruttan
. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International
Perspective.
Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
13.
Henrich, Joseph
,
Robert Boyd
,
Samuel Bowles
,
Colin Camerer
,
Ernst Fehr
,
Herbert Gintis
, and
Richard McElreath
. 2001.
“In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15
Small-Scale Societies”
. American Economic Review91:
73-78
.
14.
Kawagoe, Toshihiko. 1999. “Agricultural Land Reform in Postwar
Japan: Experiences and Issues.” World Bank Working Paper, Washington, D.C.
15.
Keefer, Philip and Stephen Knack. 2000. “Polarization, Politics,
and Property Rights: Links Between Inequality and Growth.” World Bank
Working Paper, Washington, D.C.
16.
Knack, Stephen
and
Philip Keefer
. 1995.
“Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross Country Tests Using
Alternative Institutional Measures”
. Economics and Politics7:
207-228
.
17.
Kurer, Oskar
. 1996.
“The Political Foundation of Economic Development Policies”
. Journal of Development Studies32:
645-668
.
18.
Narayan, Deepa. 1999. “Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and
Poverty.” World Bank Working Paper, Washington, D.C.
19.
Nugent, Jeffrey B. and James A. Robinson. 2002. “Are Endowments
Fate?” Discussion Paper in Public Policy, Centre for Economic Policy
Research, London, England.
20.
Olson, Mancur
. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
.
21.
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks,
Social Conflict, and Growth Collapse.” World Bank Working Paper.
22.
Shin, Gi-Wook
. 1996. Peasant Protest and Social Change in Colonial
Korea.
Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press
.
23.
Shin, Gi-Wook
. 1998.
“Agrarian Conflict and the Origins of Korean Capitalism”
. American Journal of Sociology103:
1309-1351
.
24.
Smethurst, Richard J.1986. Agricultural Development and Tenancy Disputes in Japan,
1870-1940.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
25.
Smith, T.C.1973.
“Premodern Economic Growth: Japan and the West”
. Past and Present60:
127-169
.
26.
Takigawa, Tsutomu
. 1972.
“Historical Background of Agricultural Land Reform in Japan”
. The Developing Economies10:
290-310
.
27.
Tomlinson, B.R.1985.
“Writing History Sideways: Lessons for Indian Economic Historians
from Meiji Japan”
. Modern Asian Studies19:
669-698
.
28.
Wade, Robert
. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of
Government in East Asian Industrialization.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
.
29.
Weingast, Barry R.1995.
“The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving
Federalism and Economic Development”
. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization11:
1-31
.
