Recent scientific breakthroughs have revealed an innovative method of regrowing organs from embryological stem cells. This method can be harnessed to treat various life-threatening diseases such as cancer and leukaemia. However, it has spurred controversy since it requires the destruction of the embryo from which the stem cell is derived. On the one hand, various activists argue that the unborn embryo has the right to life. On the other hand, people who need stem cell treatment might argue that they have the right to the highest attainable standard of health, and hence are entitled to stem cell treatment. Therefore, there is a potential conflict between the right to health and the right to life, and thus this paper analyses the current framework of international human rights law in order to conclude which right is applicable in this case. This paper also tackles the important and related issue of whether international human rights law currently prescribes the right to life to unborn embryos, as this is a decisive issue in determining the applicability of both rights. However, this paper will not deal with ethical questions per se.
AustA, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press2007).
2.
BaruaA, Bioethical Aspects of Stem Cell Research and Cloning: Discussion on Bioethical and Theological Perspectives (Sikkim Manipal University of Health, Medical, and Technological Sciences2009).
3.
BongsoALeeEH, Stem Cells — From Bench to Bedside (World Scientific Publishing: 2005).
4.
BlanchfieldL, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Background and Policy Issues (Congressional Research Service2013).
5.
FarleyMA, ‘Roman Catholic Views on Research Involving Human Embryonic Stem Cells’ in HollandSLebacqzKZolothL, (eds), The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (MIT Press2001).
6.
KochIE, Human Rights as Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands Under the European Convention on Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2009).
7.
LockeJ, Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge University Press1967).
8.
SchölerHR, ‘The Potential of Stem Cells: An Inventory’ in KnoepfflerNDagmarSStefanLS, (eds), Human biotechnology as Social Challenge (Ashgate Publishing2007).
9.
SingerP, Rethinking Life & Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics (St. Martin's Press1996).
10.
TobinJ, The Right to Health in International Law (OUP2012).
11.
TodresJHoweLN, ‘What the Convention on the Rights of the Child Says (and Doesn't Say) About Abortion and Family Planning’ in Todres J and others (eds), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: An Analysis of Treaty Provisions and Implications of U.S. Ratification (Transnational Publishers2006).
12.
ToebesB, Health and Human Rights in Europe (Intersentia2012).
13.
TomuschatC, ‘The Right To Life — Legal And Political Foundations’ in TomuschatCLagrangeEOeterS, (eds), The Right to Life (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2010).
Minister of Health and Others v. Treatment Action Campaign and Others2002 5 SA 721 (CC).
21.
Soobramoney v. Minister of Health (Kwazulu-Natal)1997 ZACC 17
22.
Victims of the Tugboat “13 de Marzo” v. Cuba (1996) Report No. 47/96, Inter-Am.C.H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev.
23.
Barrilleaux B and others, ‘Review: Ex Vivo Engineering of Living Tissues with Adult Stem Cells’ [2006] 12Tissue Engineering3007
24.
EpsteinJ, ‘The Pregnant Imagination, Fetal Rights, and Women's Body: A Historical Inquiry’ [1995] 7Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities139.
25.
EvansMJKaufmanMH, ‘Establishment in Culture of Pluripotent Cells from Mouse Embryos’ [1981] 292Nature154.
26.
FarerT, ‘The Hierarchy of Human Rights’ [1992] 8American University International Law Review115.
27.
GoldmanSAWindremMS, ‘Cell Replacement Therapy in Neurological Disease’ [2006] 361Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B1463.
28.
Hirata S and others, ‘Prevention of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Transfer of Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Dendritic Cells Expressing Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Peptide Along with Trail or Programmed Death-1 Ligand’ [2005] 174Journal of Immunology1888.
29.
Jiang Y and others, ‘Pluripotency of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adult Marrow’ [2002] 418Nature41.
30.
LoBParhamL, ‘Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research’ [2009] 30Endrocrine Reviews204.
31.
Pardal R and others, ‘Applying the Principles of Stem-Cell Biology to Cancer’ [2003] 3Nature Review895.
32.
PichonJ, ‘Does the Unborn Child Have a Right to Life? The Insufficient Answer of the European Court of Human Rights in the Judgment Vo v. France’ [2006] 7German Law Journal433.
33.
PollockCA, ‘Toward A Bioartificial Kidney: Will Embryonic Stem Cells Be the Answer?’ [2013] 83Kidney International543.
34.
PringleS, and others, ‘Concise Review: Adult Salivary Gland Stem Cells and A Potential Therapy for Xerostomia’ [2013] 31Stem Cells613.
35.
RaphaelY, ‘Cochlear Pathology, Sensory Cell Death and Regeneration’ [2002] 63British Medical Bulletin25.
36.
Ratajczak MZ and others, A Hypothesis for an Embryonic Origin of Pluripotent Oct-4(+) Stem Cells in Adult Bone Marrow and Other Tissues’ [2007] 21Leukemia860.
37.
Singec I and others, ‘The Leading Edge of Stem Cell Therapeutics’ [2007] 58Annual Review of Medicine313.
38.
TakahashiKYamanakaS, ‘Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors’ [2006] 126Cell663.
39.
Thomson JA and others, ‘Blastocysts Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human’ [1998] 282Science1145.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2000] OJ C 364/1.
47.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (adopted 4 April 1997, entered into force 1 December 1999) ETS 164 (Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine).
48.
Constitution of the World Health Organization (adopted 22 July 1946, entered into force 7 April 1948) 14 UNTS 185.
49.
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (adopted 18 December 1979, entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13 (CEDAW).
50.
Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990) 1577 UNTS 3 (CRC).
51.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (adopted 13 December 2006, entered into force 3 May 2008) 2515 UNTS 3 (CRPD).
European Social Charter (entered into force 26 February 1965) 529 UNTS 89.
56.
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3 (ICESCR).
57.
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (adopted 18 December 1990, entered into force 1 July 2003) 2220 UNTS 3.
UNCHR, Questions of a Convention on the Rights of the Child: Report of the Working Group on a Draft Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) UN. Document E/CN.4/1989/48.
60.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted 10 December 1948 UNGA Res 217 A(III) (UDHR).
61.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 22 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980) 1155 UNTS. 331 (VCLT).
