This article is written frompersonal experiences with the recent death of the authors’ mother. It highlights the problems the authors encountered, while acknowledging the positive aspects of treatment during a difficult time. The overall purpose is to improve end-of-life care by advancing policy through research, legislation, and education. The impetus for writing this article is personal experience, but its larger purpose is to address issues that many readers will face in the future and suggest possible reforms, especially in the area of education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bausell, B.
(2001). Introduction to the special issue. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 24(2), 107-108.
2.
Block, S. D.
(2001). Psychological consideration, growth, and transcendence at the end of life: The art of the possible. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(22), 2898-2905.
3.
Coppola, K. M.
, Ditto, P. H., Danks, J. H., & Smucker, W. D. (2001). Accuracy of primary care andhospital-basedphysicians’prediction of elderly outpatients’treatment preferences with and without advance directives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 431-440.
4.
Danger, J.
(2001). State ombudsman. Available from http://www.jeffdanger.com/stateombudsman
5.
Danis, M. D.
, Southerland, L. I., Garrett, J. M., Smith, J. L., Hielema, F., Pickard, C. G., et al. (1991). A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(13), 882-888.
6.
Ditto, P. H.
, Danks, J. H., & Smucker, W. D. (2001). Advance directives as acts of communication. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 421-430.
7.
Emanuel, L. L.
, Baray, M. J., Stoeckle, J. D., Ettelson, L. M., & Emanuel, E. J. (1991). Advance directives for medical care–A case for greater use. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(13), 889-895.
8.
Goold, S. D.
, Williams, B., & Arnold, R. M. (2000). Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: A differential diagnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(7), 909-914.
9.
Lynn, J.
(2000). Learning to care for people with chronic illness facing the endof life. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2508-2511.
10.
McPhee, S. J.
, Rabow, M. W., Pantilat, S. Z., Markowitz, A. J., & Winker, M. A. (2000). Finding our way—Perspectives on care at the close of life. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2512-2513.
11.
Meisel, A.
, Synder, S., & Quill, T. (2000). Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2495-2501.
12.
Quill, T. E.
, Dresser, R. D., & Brock, D. W. (1997). The rule of double effect—A critique of its role in end-of-life decision making. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 1768-1771.
13.
Steinhauser, K. E.
, Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., NcNeilly, M., McIntyre, L., & Tulsky, J. A. (2000). Factors considered important at the endof life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2476-2482.
14.
Zerzan, J.
, Stearns, S., & Hanson, L. (2000). Access to palliative care andhospice in nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2489-2494.
