Managing human systems needs to build effective learning environment. The foreign business community (FBC) in Thailand initiated a pilot project a decade ago to explore the relation between external feedback and disengaged students in one urban school as part of building future workforce.
Objective
This exploratory study intends to identify specific activities of external feedback that earlier inspired strong students’ positive reactions on learning. Earlier follow-ups during the pilot phase showed higher social interactions, more positive feeling of psychological and physical safety, and greater learning interests with external feedback.
Method
Data was collected via open-ended questionnaires and analyzed using Content Analysis (CA) and Thematic Analysis (TA).
Results
The findings suggest that students react positively to interactions with outside individuals and opportunities for peer-to-peer learning. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of second-loop feedback in shaping students’ mindset and fostering the change in their disengaged behavior. In addition to teacher-student relationship, school-business collaboration offers constructive feedback that significantly connects with students’ learning behavior.
Conclusion
External feedback constitutes a critical component in addressing school disengagement within this specific urban context. These findings offer a starting point for developing future studies of learning within complex human systems, including a workplace.
AbbasSIrshadMNabiM, et al.Bridging employee-oriented HR practices and employee innovative behavior: unpacking the mediating role of employee commitment. Int J Innovat Learn2026; 39(3): 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2026.152806
2.
SheCLiangQJiangW, et al.Learning adaptability facilitates self-regulated learning at school: the chain mediating roles of academic motivation and self-management. Front Psychol2023; 14: 1162072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162072
3.
ChaharSTripathiG. Mapping the pathways to innovation in PhD scholars: the interplay of university structure, academic leadership and psychological capital. Int J Innovat Learn2026; 39(1): 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2026.150301
HalonenS. Entrepreneur's resilience development in one-to-one resilience coaching. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 38(4): 490–514. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.149617
6.
JantanasakulT. Professional development disparities between rural and urban schools in Thailand. Educational Policy Journal of Thailand2021; 9(3): 45–58.
7.
KennedyK. Issues for urban youth in Asia and the Pacific. In: KeevesJP (ed), et al. (eds). International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region. Springer, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3368-7_15
8.
ManowaluilouNNilsookPBuasuwanP. Perceptions and the new paradigm of Thai vocational education. Int J Innovat Learn2023; 33(3): 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2023.130101
9.
KatemukdaN. Enhancement of national productivity by the source of innovation: a study of ASEAN-Developing countries. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 38(2): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.148263
10.
WittayasinS. Education challenges to Thailand 4.0. International Journal of Integrated Education and Development2017; 2(2): 29–35.
11.
CiccarelliMPapettiAGermaniM. Exploring how new industrial paradigms affect the workforce: a literature review of operator 4.0. J Manuf Syst2023; 70: 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.003
12.
GadekarRSarkarBGadekarA. Investigating the relationship among industry 4.0 drivers, adoption, risks reduction, and sustainable organizational performance in manufacturing industries: an empirical study. Sustain Prod Consum2022; 31: 670–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.002
13.
PotjanajaruwitPGirdwichaiL. Creative innovation of startup businesses in Thailand 4.0 era. Journal of International Studies2019; 12(3): 222–231. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-3/18
14.
PuriwatWTripopsakulS. Preparing for industry 4.0 – will youths have enough essential skills? an evidence from Thailand. Int J InStruct2020; 13(3): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1337a
15.
DurongkaverojW. Recent developments in basic education in Thailand: issues and challenges. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies2023; 39(5): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae39-sc
PrasartpornsirichokeJTakahashiY. Assessing inequalities in Thai education. Thai Journal of East Asian Studies2013; 18(1): 1–26.
18.
Center for Public Education. Urban student characteristics and urban school challenges: what high-quality education for every student means. The National School Boards Association, 2024.
19.
FergusonHBovairdSMuellerM. The impact of poverty on educational outcomes for children. Pediatrics & Child Health2007; 12(8): 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/12.8.701
20.
LounkaewK. Explaining urban–rural differences in educational achievement in Thailand: evidence from PISA literacy data. Econ Educ Rev2013; 37(2): 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.09.003
21.
ArroyoYPeñabaena-NieblesRCorreaC. Influence of environmental conditions on students' learning processes: a systematic review. Build Environ2023; 231: 110051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110051
22.
BachHTruongQDuongN. A study on employees' knowledge-sharing behaviour: evidence from logistics firms in Vietnam. Int J Innovat Learn2024; 35(4): 482–509. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2024.138815
23.
DittmarEJiménezDPortilloJ. From barriers to bridges: an interdisciplinary study of disability integration challenges and solutions in higher learning. Int J Innovat Learn2026; 39(2): 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2026.151463
24.
AldridgeJBianchetS. Using student feedback about the learning environment as a starting point for co-construction. Learn Environ Res2022; 25(4): 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09403-9
GhoorchaeiBMamashlooFAyatollahiMA, et al.Effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL writers’ short- and long-term retention of subject–verb agreement. Cogent Educ2022; 9(1): 2014022. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2014022
27.
NarcissSPrescherCKhalifahL, et al.Providing external feedback and prompting the generation of internal feedback fosters achievement, strategies, and motivation in concept learning. Educ Psychol Rev2021; 33: 1619–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09579-1
28.
WijgaMBeausaertSKyndtE. What drives workplace learning: a systematic review of key antecedents. J Workplace Learn2025; 37(9): 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-05-2025-0119
29.
KabirS. An insight into curriculum policy and classroom practice of teaching listening: problems and possibilities. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 37(4): 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.146521
30.
LiSYuM. How does an organisation's experiential learning affect its process innovation capabilities? The moderated mediating effect of absorption capability and network dependence. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 37(3): 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.145347
31.
OmerAAbdularhimM. The criteria of constructive feedback: the feedback that counts. Journal of Health Specialties2017; 5(2): 45–48. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhs.jhs_27_17
32.
SaridABoeve-de PauwJChristodoulouA, et al.Reconceptualizing open schooling: towards a multidimensional model of school openness. J Curric Stud2024; 57(2): 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2392592
33.
MeeranMKhuthbuddinSAl-HinaiA, et al.Exploring learning mechanisms and influences on student engagement and academic performance. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 37(4): 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.146512
34.
CaseyE. Partnership in work integrated learning: the efficacy of a partnership model in facilitating school placement based learning and assessment. Int J Innovat Bio Sci2024; 10(2): 723–730. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2024.0088
35.
WorapongpatN. Building collaboration between schools and communities: a case study of multiple schools in luoyang district. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews2025; 2(3): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2025.1097
36.
LeeKHopeJAbdulghaniF. Planned approaches to business and school partnerships: does it make a difference? The business perspective. Eval Progr Plann2016; 55: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.11.002
37.
ArgyrisCSchönD. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, 1978.
38.
RyanRDeciE. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol2020; 61: 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
39.
CarlessDBoudD. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assess Eval High Educ2018; 43(8): 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
YanZCarlessD. Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy. Assess Eval High Educ2021; 47(7): 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
43.
DeciERyanR. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq2000; 11(4): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
44.
NicolDJMacfarlane-DickD. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ2006; 31(2): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
45.
WeiWCheongCMZhuX, et al.Comparing self-reflection and peer feedback practices in an academic writing task: a student self-efficacy perspective. Teach High Educ2022; 29(4): 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2042242
46.
ArgyrisCSchönD. Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, 1974.
47.
ArgyrisC. Double-loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev1977; 55(5): 115–125.
48.
ChongSW. The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: from feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Educ2022; 9(1): 2082120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120
49.
WilkinsJ. Good teacher–student relationships: perspectives of teachers in urban high schools. Am Second Educ2023; 51(1): 52–68.
50.
BureauJSHowardJLChongJXY, et al.Pathways to student motivation: a meta-analysis based on self-determination theory. Motiv Emot2021; 45(2): 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09817-1
51.
EvaKWMunozJHansonMD, et al.Which factors, personal or external, Most influence students’ generation of learning goals?Med Educ2020; 54(3): 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14000
52.
MutterERLiuZGollwitzerPM, et al.More direction but less freedom? How task rules affect intrinsic motivation. J Exp Psychol Gen2023; 152(6): 1484–1501. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001487
53.
LiRLimYTanG. Nurturing innovation in virtual work climate: the power of self-determination and learning orientation. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 37(3): 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2025.145331
54.
PinedaMAMendozaGVelardeCM, et al.The relationship between social support and depression among senior high school students in the midst of online learning modality. Psychology and Education: A Multidiscip J2022; 2(1): 44–51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534398
55.
MarshallBCardonPPoddarA, et al.Does sample size matter in qualitative research? a review of qualitative interviews in IS research. J Comput Inf Syst2013; 54(2): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
56.
SurakarnAJunprasertTChaiakkarakanN, et al.Active learning and its outcomes: a case study from the education reform project in Thailand. The Journal of Behavioral Science2020; 15(1): 34–51.
57.
CartwrightMO'CallaghanEStacyS, et al.Addressing the educational challenges of urban poverty: a case for solution-based research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics2023; 11: 981837. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.981837
58.
HeY. Beyond the classroom walls: investigating the interplay of school environment and student motivation on academic achievement among high school learners in urban Bangkok. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology2025; 10(5): 2802–2812. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may2041
59.
LuchinskayaD. Employer size and graduates’ use of skills and knowledge at work: an analysis of graduates’ early career outcomes. J Educ Work2024; 37(7-8): 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2025.2534794
60.
KanchanaRPhusavatKPastuszakZ, et al.Effects of external feedback on disengagement in a human-centric environment. Hum Syst Manag2022; 41(6): 685–697. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-220020
61.
WorleyP. Open thinking closed questioning: two kinds of open and closed question. Journal of Philosophy in Schools2015; 2(2): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v2i2.1269
HumbleNMozeliusP. Content analysis or thematic analysis: doctoral students’ perceptions of similarities and differences. Electron J Bus Res Methods2022; 20(3): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2920
ChiuKChenR. Examining the moderating and intervening effects of communication apprehension on perceived learning. Int J Innovat Learn2024; 35(2): 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2024.136469
66.
JulakarnPWongprasertJSenaratS. Factors affecting academic achievement in Thai educational contexts: a systematic review. High Educ Stud2025; 15(3): 348–363. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v15n3p348
67.
SuardinYMTarnoSLOmarS, et al.Enhancing student motivation to learn using self-determination theory as a framework: an exploration of internal and external factors in the context of sekolah dasar negeri 1 kapoa, buton selatan. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia2023; 2(3): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v2i03.240
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
