This study investigates the impact of Spiritual Leadership (SL) on the employee’s Intrapreneurial Behavior (IB) in the hospitality sector of Pakistan.
Objective
Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, we proposed a model with the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation (IM) on the relationship between SL-IB, and moderating effect of Harmonious Work Passion (HWP) on SL-IM, and IM-IPB relationships.
Methodology
Data was collected form 252, front-line and managerial level employees using purposive sampling technique. Smart PLS 4 was used to test the measurement and structural models.
Results
The findings revealed that SL has no direct effect on IB but exerts a significant impact mediated by IM. Furthermore, HWP strengthens the SL-IM link, but weakens the IM-IB relationship.
Conclusion
This indicates a psychological mechanism, highlighting that empowering employees’ inner motivation is more critical than leadership alone. The findings offer a nuanced understanding of driving employees’ intrapreneurial behavior by highlighting the pivotal role of IM and HWP.
MumtazSRowleyC. Human resource management in Pakistan. In: RowleyCCookeF (eds). Management in South Asia. Routledge, 2020, pp. 179–202.
7.
EvaNRobinMSendjayaS, et al.Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. Leadersh Q2019; 30(1): 111–132.
8.
WangMGuoTNiY, et al.The effect of spiritual leadership on employee effectiveness: an intrinsic motivation perspective. Front Psychol2019; 9: 2627.
9.
AfsarBBadirYKianiUS. Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: the influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. J Environ Psychol2016; 45: 79–88.
10.
FryLW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadersh Q2003; 14(6): 693–727.
11.
OttenbacherMGnothJ. How to develop successful hospitality innovation. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q2005; 46(2): 205–222.
12.
UsmanMAliMOgbonnayaC, et al.Fueling the intrapreneurial spirit: a closer look at how spiritual leadership motivates employee intrapreneurial behaviors. Tour Manag2021; 83: 104227.
13.
HunsakerWD. Spiritual leadership and employee innovation. Curr Psychol2022; 41(8): 5048–5057.
14.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol2000; 55(1): 68–78.
15.
ZhangXBartolKM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manag J2010; 53(1): 107–128.
16.
TierneyPFarmerSM. Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. J Appl Psychol2011; 96(2): 277–293.
17.
MorianoJAMoleroFTopaG, et al.The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. Int Enterpren Manag J2014; 10: 103–119.
18.
GrantAM. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol2008; 93(1): 48–58.
19.
AmabileTM. Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Hum Resour Manag Rev1993; 3(3): 185–201.
20.
VallerandRJHoulfortN. Passion at Work: Toward a New Conceptualization. In: GillilandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (eds) Emerging Perspective on Values in Organizations. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 2003, pp. 175–204.
21.
VallerandRJ. The psychology of passion: a dualistic model. Oxford University Press, 2015.
22.
MadaanKSharmaH. Linking empowering leadership to employee work-behaviors in the hospitality context: the role of harmonious work passion as a mediator. J Hum Resour Hospit Tourism2024; 23(3): 531–560.
23.
MadaanKJainDSharmaH. Does paradoxical leadership predict employee job performance in hospitality? A sequential mediation of harmonious work passion and innovative work behavior. J Hospit Tour Insights2025; 8(4): 1458–1477.
24.
LinCZhouXHouD. Paradoxical leadership and employee creativity: the roles of harmonious work passion and proactive personality. Leader Organ Dev J2024; 45(6): 1063–1082.
25.
DeciELRyanRM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol2008; 49(3): 182–185.
26.
ParkerSKBindlUKStraussK. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J Manag2010; 36(4): 827–856.
27.
GrantAMBerryJW. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad Manag J2011; 54(1): 73–96.
28.
GagnéMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav2005; 26(4): 331–362.
29.
BayighomogSWAraslıH. Workplace spirituality–customer engagement nexus: the mediated role of spiritual leadership on customer–oriented boundary–spanning behaviors. Serv Ind J2019; 39(7-8): 637–661.
30.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, 2017.
BanduraA. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, 1986.
33.
HobfollSE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol1989; 44(3): 513–524.
34.
ForestJMageauGASarrazinC, et al.“Work is my passion”: the different affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of harmonious and obsessive passion toward work. Can J Adm Sci Rev Canad Sci Adm2011; 28(1): 27–40.
35.
FarrukhMLeeJWCShahzadIA. Intrapreneurial behavior in higher educational institutes of Pakistan: the role of employee motivation, leadership style, and perceived organizational support. J Appl Res High Educ2019; 11(2): 273–294.
36.
AlamAUddinMYazdifarH. Institutional determinants of R&D investment: evidence from emerging markets. Technol Forecast Soc Change2020; 138: 34–44.
37.
FarrukhMYingCWMansoriS. Organizationalcommitment: how leadership style affects it in the Pakistani hospitality industry. J Hum Resour Hospit Tourism2021; 20(4): 511–532.
38.
FryLWVitucciSCedilloM. Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. Leadersh Q2005; 16(5): 835–862.
39.
FryLEgelE. Spiritual leadership: embedding sustainability in the triple bottom line. Graziadio Business Review. 2017; 20(3): 1–28.
40.
YangMFryL. The role of spiritual leadership in reducing healthcare worker burnout. J Manag Spiritual Relig2018; 15(4): 305–324.
41.
LeeSLovelaceKJManzCC. Serving with spirit: an integrative model of workplace spirituality within service organizations. J Manag Spiritual Relig2014; 11(1): 45–64.
42.
LockeEALathamGP. New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge New York, 2013, Vol. 24.
43.
RobbinsSPDeCenzoDA. Fundamentals of management: essential concepts and applications. Prentice Hall, 2008.
44.
ZeuchM. Handbook of human resources management. Springer Reference, 2016.
45.
BreaughJRitzAAlfesK. Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction. Public Manag Rev2018; 20(10): 1423–1443.
46.
ChenC-YLiC-I. Assessing the spiritual leadership effectiveness: the contribution of follower's self-concept and preliminary tests for moderation of culture and managerial position. Leadersh Q2013; 24(1): 240–255.
47.
SupriyantoAEkowatiVMaghfurohU. Do organizational citizenship behavior and work satisfaction mediate the relationship between spiritual leadership and employee performance?Manag Sci Lett2020; 10(5): 1107–1114.
48.
MondyRWMartocchioJJ. Human resource management fourteenth edition global edition. Pearson Education Limited, 2016.
49.
AndrewsKMDelahayeBL. Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: the psychosocial filter. J Manag Stud2000; 37(6): 797–810.
50.
FrajEMatuteJMeleroI. Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: the role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tour Manag2015; 46: 30–42.
51.
FreseMFayD. 4. Personal initiative: an active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Res Organ Behav2001; 23: 133–187.
52.
GarrinJM. The will to lead: the dynamic integration of intrinsic motivation and social change leadership. Journal of Sustainable Social Change2014; 6(1): 6.
53.
LiJChoYChaudhuriS. Conclusion: learnings from eight country studies on women entrepreneurs in Asia. Adv Develop Hum Resour2020; 22(2): 227–235.
54.
VroomVH. Organizational choice: a study of pre-and postdecision processes. Organ Behav Hum Perform1966; 1(2): 212–225.
55.
LebelRDPatilSV. Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: the powerful role of prosocial motivation. J Appl Psychol2018; 103(7): 724–737.
56.
CarbonneauNVallerandRJFernetC, et al.The role of passion for teaching in intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes. J Educ Psychol2008; 100(4): 977–987.
57.
LiuDChenX-PYaoX. From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. J Appl Psychol2011; 96(2): 294–309.
58.
TrépanierS-GFernetCAustinS, et al.Linking job demands and resources to burnout and work engagement: does passion underlie these differential relationships?Motiv Emot2014; 38: 353–366.
59.
SaundersMLewisPThornhillA. Research methods forbusiness students. Prentice Hall, Financial Times, 2003.
60.
BrymanABellE. Business research methods. 4th ed.Oxford University Press, 2015.
61.
AliFCiftciONanuL, et al.Response rates in hospitality research: an overview of current practice and suggestions for future research. Cornell Hosp Q2020; 62: 193896552094309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520943094
ZikmundWGBabinBJCarrJC, et al.Business research methods. 8th ed.South-Western Cengage Learning, 2010.
64.
StullMSinghJ. Intrapreneurship in nonprofit organizations: examining the factors that facilitate entrepreneurial behavior among employees. Retrieved May2005; 24(2005): 192–210.
65.
AnserMKAliMUsmanM, et al.Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: an intervening and interactional analysis. Serv Ind J2021; 41(5–6): 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1739657
66.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88(5): 879–903.
HairJFHowardMCNitzlC. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res2020; 109(August 2019): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
69.
HairJFRingleCMGuderganSP, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research2019; 12(1): 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
70.
RingleCMSarstedtMMitchellR, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. Int J Hum Resour Manag2018; 31: 1–27, January. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
71.
LavigneGLForestJFernetC, et al.Passion at work and workers’ evaluations of job demands and resources: a longitudinal study. J Appl Soc Psychol2014; 44(4): 255–265.
72.
JeonKSChoiBK. A multidimensional analysis of spiritual leadership, affective commitment and employees’ creativity in South Korea. Leader Organ Dev J2020; 41(8): 1035–1052.
73.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJE. Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manag Rev2001; 26(2): 179–201.
74.
DeciELKoestnerRRyanRM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull1999; 125(6): 627–668.
75.
Lips-WiersmaMWrightS. Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: development and validation of the Comprehensive Meaningful Work Scale (CMWS). Group Organ Manag2012; 37(5): 655–685.
