Why and how conveying respect may foster the engagement of immigrant employees, who often occupy a vulnerable position within the workforce, in intrapreneurship—one’s search and pursuit of new venture opportunities? This question is situated within the discourse about our intrinsic drive to connect and engage with others, both socially and at work, which is essential for developing positive relationships that inspire and propel work engagement and action.
Objective
Research in this area has tended to focus on one’s experiences of respect in the interactions with others and her/his work engagement. However, little is known about why and how working immigrants who convey respect in their relationships with others may be driven to engage in specific work behaviors—intrapreneurship.
Method
We conducted both time-lagged and experimental studies to examine this question. The findings indicate that interacting respectfully with others (i.e., conveying respect) cultivates relational energy, which in turn encourages immigrant employees to engage in intrapreneurial behaviors.
Conclusion
Our findings advance the relational resourcing view by shifting the focus from experiencing respect in work relationships to the act of conveying respect, suggesting that immigrant employees who engage respectfully with others cultivate relational energy and, in turn, are better positioned to generate new venture initiatives and contribute meaningfully to their organizations.
ParkerSC. Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship?J Bus Ventur2011; 26(1): 19–34.
4.
CarrierC. Intrapreneurship in small businesses: an exploratory study. Entrep Theory Pract1996; 21(1): 5–20.
5.
GawkeJCGorgievskiMJBakkerAB. Personal costs and benefits of employee intrapreneurship: disentangling the employee intrapreneurship, well-being, and job performance relationship. J Occup Health Psychol2018; 23(4): 508–519.
6.
AbbasWWuW. The moderating role of intrapreneurial personality in relation between leader humility and innovative behavior. Hum Syst Manag2019; 38(4): 329–337.
7.
WillerDLovagliaMMarkovskyB. Power and influence: a theoretical bridge. Soc Forces1997; 76: 571–603.
8.
YitshakiYAvital-MecilatyECarmeliA, et al.Untangling the intrapreneurship process in organizations. Technovation2026; 152: 103493.
9.
PortesAHaoL. The global hunt for talent. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2005.
10.
ZikicJ. Skilled migrants’ career capital as a source of competitive advantage: implications for strategic HRM. Int J Hum Resour Manag2015; 26(10): 1360–1381.
11.
Aliaga-IslaRRialpA. Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: previous findings and ways forward. Entrepreneursh Reg Dev2013; 25(9-10): 819–844.
12.
Bradley-GeistJCSchmidtkeJM. Immigrants in the workplace: stereotyping and discrimination. In: ColellaAJKingEB (eds). The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. : Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 159–176.
13.
HeilbrunnSKushnirovichNZeltzer-ZubidaA. Barriers to immigrants' integration into the labor market: modes and coping. Int J Intercult Relat2010; 34(3): 244–252.
14.
MahmudSAlamQHärtelC. Mismatches in skills and attributes of immigrants and problems with workplace integration: a study of IT and engineering professionals in Australia. Hum Resour Manag J2014; 24(3): 339–354.
15.
WatersMCPineauMG (eds). The integration of immigrants into American society. National Academies Press, 2015.
16.
BinggeliSDietzJKringsF. Immigrants: a forgotten minority. Ind Organ Psychol2013; 6: 107–113.
17.
International Labour Office. Global estimates on international migrant workers – results and methodology. 3rd ed.ILO, 2021.
18.
GuoCAl ArissA. Human resource management of international migrants. Int J Hum Resour Manag2015; 26(10): 1287–1297.
19.
GriffinMA. Specifying organizational contexts: systematic links between contexts and processes in organizational behavior. J Organ Behav2007; 28(7): 859–863.
CarmeliADuttonJEHardinAE. Respect as an engine for new ideas: linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Hum Relat2015; 68(6): 1021–1047.
22.
FriedmanACarmeliADuttonJE. When does respectful engagement with one's supervisor foster help-seeking behaviors and performance?J Vocat Behav2018; 104: 184–198.
23.
RogersKMAshforthBE. Respect in organizations: feeling valued as “we” and “me”. J Manag2017; 43(5): 1578–1608.
24.
BakerWE. Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: toward a multilevel model. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2019; 6: 373–395.
25.
OwensBPBakerWESumpterDM, et al.Relational energy at work: implications for job engagement and job performance. J Appl Psychol2016; 101(1): 35–49.
26.
SchippersMHogenesR. Energy management of people in organizations: a review and research agenda. J Bus Psychol2011; 26: 193–203.
27.
DietzJJoshiCEssesVM, et al.The skill paradox: explaining and reducing employment discrimination against skilled immigrants. Int J Hum Resour Manag2015; 26(10): 1318–1334.
28.
DuttonJE. Energize your workplace: how to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. Jossey-Bass, 2003.
29.
DuttonJEHeaphyED. The power of high-quality connections. In: CameronKSDuttonJEQuinnRE (eds). Positive organizational scholarship: foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler, 2003, pp. 263–278.
30.
DuttonJERaginsBR (eds). Exploring positive relationships at work: building a theoretical and research foundation. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007.
31.
YogevDCarmeliA. A micro-foundation lens on buyers' and suppliers' working relationships exchange: the power of respectful interactions. Hum Manag Syst2026; 45(2): 155–172.
32.
SimonB. Respect, equality, and power: a social psychological perspective. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation2007; 38: 309–326.
33.
SpearsREllemersNDoosjeB, et al.The individual within the group: respect. In: PostmesTJettenJ (eds). Individuality and the group. Sage, 2006, pp. 175–195.
34.
ShoreLMRandelAEChungBG, et al.Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J Manag2011; 37(4): 1262–1289.
35.
BakerWDuttonJE. Enabling positive social capital in organizations. In: DuttonJERaginsBR (eds). Exploring positive relationships at work: building a theoretical and research foundation. Erlbaum, 2007, pp. 325–345.
36.
VogusTJIacobucciD. Creating highly reliable health care. ILR Rev2016; 69(4): 911–938.
37.
StephensJPCarmeliA. Relational leadership and creativity. In: Handbook of research on leadership and creativity. Edward Elgar, 2017, pp. 273–296.
38.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJEDebebeG. Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Res Organ Behav2003; 25: 93–135.
39.
LaGreeDHoustonBDuffyM, et al.The effect of respect: respectful communication at work drives resiliency, engagement, and job satisfaction among early career employees. Int J Bus Commun2021; 60(3): 844–864.
40.
RothersACohrsJC. What makes people feel respected? Toward an integrative psychology of social worth. Psychol Rev2023; 130(1): 242–259.
41.
MansoorAFarrukhMWuY, et al.Does inclusive leadership incite innovative work behavior?Hum Manag. Syst2020; 40(1): 93–102.
42.
OECD, European Commission. The missing entrepreneurs 2023: policies for inclusive entrepreneurship and self-employment. OECD Publishing, 2023.
43.
Ramos-EscobarEAGarcía-Pérez-de-LemaDCastillo-VergaraM, et al.Immigrant entrepreneurs: a review of the literature and an agenda for future investigations. Int J Intercult Relat2022; 91: 170–190.
44.
Ramati-NavonLCarmeliAMenahemG. Inclusiveness and intrapreneurial behaviours in organisations. J Entrep2022; 31(2): 235–273.
45.
GenkovaP. Migration and diversity potentials for the labour market. In: CagáňováDHorňákováN (eds). Mobility Internet of Things 2018. Springer, 2020, pp. 507–519.
46.
AngerSBassettoJSandnerM. Making integration work? Facilitating access to occupational recognition and immigrants' labor market performance. IAB Discussion Paper. 2022. DOI: 10.48720/IAB.DP.2211.
47.
KaushikVWalshCAHaefeleD. Social integration of immigrants within the linguistically diverse workplace. Rev Soc Sci2016; 1(1): 15–25.
48.
GoffmanE. Interaction ritual. Doubleday, 1967.
49.
RamarajanLBarsadeSGBurackOR. The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services. J Posit Psychol2008; 3(1): 4–18.
50.
RogersCR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol1957; 21: 95–103.
51.
KumarAEpleyN. A little good goes an unexpectedly long way: underestimating the positive impact of kindness on recipients. J Exp Psychol Gen2023; 152(1): 236–252.
52.
PorathCLGerbasiA. Does civility pay?Organ Dyn2015; 44(4): 281–286.
53.
BaronRA. Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strateg Entrep J2007; 1(1-2): 167–182.
54.
CarlsenADuttonJE. The call for generativity. In: CarlsenADuttonJE (eds). Research alive: exploring generative moments in doing qualitative research. Copenhagen Business School Press, 2011, pp. 12–24.
55.
TylerTRBladerSL. Autonomous vs. comparative status: must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?Organ Behav Hum Decis Process2002; 89(1): 813–838.
56.
FlynnFJ. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad Manag J2003; 46(5): 539–553.
57.
WangLOwensBPLiJJ, et al.Exploring the affective impact, boundary conditions, and antecedents of leader humility. J Appl Psychol2018; 103(9): 1019–1038.
CarmeliADothanA. Engagement of family executive members in intrapreneurship in the family business. J Technol Transf2024; 49(3): 1062–1088.
60.
ArgoteNBonillaAGonzález-MoralesMG. Cultural stress among immigrants in the workforce. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol2024; 30(4): 740–751.
61.
International Organization for Migration. The other migrant crisis: protecting migrant workers against exploitation in the Middle East and North America. IOM, 2015.
62.
ApostolidouAKunzeF. Do immigrants increase group productivity? A study of blue-collar workgroups. Acad Manag Discov2025; 11(3): 377–402.
63.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol2012; 63(1): 539–569.
64.
BacharachSBBambergerP. Beyond situational constraints: job resources inadequacy and individual performance at work. Hum Resour Manag Rev1995; 5: 79–102.
65.
VillanovaPRomanMA. A meta-analytic review of situational constraints and work-related outcomes: alternative approaches to conceptualization. Hum Resour Manag Rev1993; 3: 147–175.
66.
RousseauVAubéC. Social support at work and affective commitment to the organization: the moderating effect of job resource adequacy and ambient conditions. J Soc Psychol2010; 150(4): 321–340.
67.
ShaneSA. A general theory of entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar, 2003.
68.
KleinAMoosbruggerH. Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika2000; 65(4): 457–474.
69.
MuthenBMuthenL. Mplus. In: Van der LindenWJ (ed). Handbook of item response theory. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017, pp. 507–518.
70.
MaslowskyJJagerJHemkenD. Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: a tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. Int J Behav Dev2015; 39(1): 87–96.
71.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res1981; 18(1): 39–50.
72.
ValenteMJRijnhartJJMSmythHL, et al.Causal Mediation Programs in R, M plus, SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Struct Equ Modeling2020; 27(6): 975–984.
73.
MuthenBOMuthenLKAsparouhovT. Regression and mediation analysis using Mplus. Muthen & Muthen, 2017.
74.
VanderWeeleTJ. A unification of mediation and interaction: a 4-way decomposition. Epidemiology2014; 25(5): 749–761.
75.
MacKinnonDPValenteMJGonzalezO. The correspondence between causal and traditional mediation analysis: the link is the mediator by treatment interaction. Prev Sci2020; 21: 147–157.
76.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 3rd ed.Guilford Press, 2022.
