Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
The moderating role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between transformational leadership,organizational citizenship behavior,innovative work behavior,and employee performance in commercial banks in Vietnam
Improving employee performance (EP) to enhance organizational performance (OP) is a central concern for many organizations. There is still limited research on the influence of transformational leadership style (TLS) on employee behavior, thereby promoting EP or research on the emotional involvement in the relationship between TLS and employee behavior.
Objective
Examining the moderating role of emotional intelligence (EI) in the relationship between transformational leadership (TL), employee behavior including innovative work behavior (IWB), and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), EP.
Methods
Data from 309 employees in commercial banks in Vietnam were analyzed using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4.0 to test hypotheses.
Results
The direct effects of TL on IWB, EP, OCB, IWB on EP, OCB on EP, IWB were all supported. IWB mediates the relationships between TL and EP, OCB and EP; OCB mediates the relationships between TL and EP, TL and IWB. EI plays moderating role in the relationships between TL and IWB, TL and EP.
Conclusion
TLS plays a vital role in fostering IWB, OCB, and enhancing EP. Employees with high EI can strengthen the impact of TL on both IWB and EP. Managers should focus on improving employees’ EI and applying TLS to change employee behavior, thus improving EP.
TerglavKRuzzierMKKašeR. Internal branding process: exploring the role of mediators in top management’s leadership–commitment relationship. Int J Hospit Manag2016; 54: 1–11.
2.
AvolioBJGardnerWLWalumbwaFO, et al.Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadersh Q2004; 15(6): 801–823.
3.
WallaceEde ChernatonyLBuilI. Building bank brands: how leadership behavior influences employee commitment. J Bus Res2013; 66(2): 165–171.
4.
AboramadanMDahleezKA. Leadership styles and employees’ work outcomes in nonprofit organizations: the role of work engagement. J Manag Dev2020; 39(7/8): 869–893.
5.
LaiFYTangHCLuSC, et al.Transformational leadership and job performance: the mediating role of work engagement. Sage Open2020; 10(1): 1–11.
6.
FiazMSuQSaqibA, et al.Leadership styles and employees’ motivation: perspective from an emerging economy. J Develop Area2017; 51(4): 143–156.
7.
KimMBeehrTA. Can empowering leaders affect subordinates’ well-being and careers because they encourage subordinates’ job crafting behaviors?J Leader Organ Stud2018; 25(2): 184–196.
8.
MurphyWHAndersonRE. Transformational leadership effects on salespeople’s attitudes, striving, and performance. J Bus Res2020; 110: 237–245.
9.
PieterseANVan KnippenbergDSchippersM, et al.Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. J Organ Behav2010; 31(4): 609–623.
10.
QalatiSAZafarZFanM, et al.Employee performance under transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: a mediated model. Heliyon2022; 8(11): e11374.
11.
AryeeSWalumbwaFOZhouQ, et al.Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: test of mediation and moderation processes. Hum Perform2012; 25(1): 1–25.
12.
AvolioBJWalumbwaFOWeberTJ. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol2009; 60(1): 421–449.
13.
ScottSGBruceRA. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J1994; 37(3): 580–607.
14.
RosingKFreseMBauschA. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q2011; 22(5): 956–974.
15.
HughesDJLeeATianAW, et al.Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. Leadersh Q2018; 29(5): 549–569.
16.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPaineJB, et al.Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J Manag2000; 26(3): 513–563.
17.
PodsakoffNPWhitingSWPodsakoffPM, et al.Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol2009; 94(1): 122–141.
18.
BolinoMCTurnleyWHBloodgoodJM. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Acad Manag Rev2002; 27(4): 505–522.
19.
BolinoMCTurnleyWH. The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. J Appl Psychol2005; 90(4): 740–748.
20.
HalbeslebenJRBowlerWM. Emotional exhaustion and job performance: the mediating role of motivation. J Appl Psychol2007; 92(1): 93–106.
21.
HouseRJ. A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Adm Sci Q1971; 16(3): 321–339.
22.
BlauP. Exchange and power in social life. Routledge, 1964.
23.
FredricksonBL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol2001; 56(3): 218–226.
24.
HatfieldECacioppoJTRapsonRL. Primitive emotional contagion. Review of personality and social psychology: emotions and social behavior. Sage, 1992, pp. 151–177.
25.
WeissHMCropanzanoR. Affective events theory. Res Organ Behav1996; 18(1): 1–74.
26.
BassBM. From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organ Dyn1990; 18(3): 19–31.
27.
KanterR. Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. J Bus Ventur1985; 1(1): 47–60.
28.
DelugaRJSouzaJ. The effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on the influencing behaviour of subordinate police officers. J Occup Psychol1991; 64(1): 49–55.
29.
HittMADuaneR. The essence of strategic leadership: managing human and social capital. J Leader Organ Stud2002; 9(1): 3–14.
30.
AfsarBBadir YFBinSB. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Ind Manag Data Syst2014; 114(8): 1270–1300.
31.
BakkerABDemeroutiE. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol2017; 22(3): 273–285.
32.
PattersonFKerrinMGatto-RoissardG, et al.Everyday innovation: how to enhance innovative working in employees and organisations. Nesta, 2009.
33.
JungDIChowCWuA. The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadersh Q2003; 14(4–5): 525–544.
34.
AbbasGIqbalJWaheedA, et al.Relationship between transformational leadership style and innovative work behavior in educational institutions. J Behav Sci2012; 22(3): 112–122.
35.
KhanMAIsmailFBHussainA, et al.The interplay of leadership styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational citizenship behavior. Sage Open2020; 10(1): 2158244019898264.
36.
KhanMJAslamNRiazMN. Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology2012; 9(2): 17–22.
37.
TorresFCEspinosaJCDornbergerU, et al.Leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior: test of a mediation and moderation model. Asian Soc Sci2017; 13(9): 9–25.
38.
GongYHuangJ-CFarhJ-L. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad Manage J2009; 52(4): 765–778.
39.
MotowidloSJKellHJ. Job performance. Handbook of psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology2003; 12(4): 39–53.
40.
MukhtarAModdingBLatiefB, et al.The influence of competence, organizational culture and work stress on job satisfaction and performance of sharia bank employees in Makassar. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science2018; 6(5): 58–64.
41.
BurnsJ. Leadership. Harper & Row, 1978.
42.
ManafAHALatifLA. Transformational leadership and job performance of SMEs technical personnel: the adaptability cultural approach as mediator. Mediterr J Soc Sci2014; 5(20): 648–655.
43.
GeyeryALJSteyrerJM. Transformational leadership and objective performance in banks. Appl Psychol1998; 47(3): 397–420.
44.
RajaASPalanichamyP. Leadership styles and its impact on organizational commitment. Asia Pac Bus Rev2011; 7(3): 167–175.
45.
ThamrinHM. The influence of transformational leadership and organizational commitment on job satisfaction and employee performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology2012; 3(5): 566–572.
46.
BuilIMartínezEMatuteJ. Transformational leadership and employee performance: the role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. Int J Hospit Manag2019; 77: 64–75.
47.
LuhgiatnoWWidaryantiSA. The effect of ODOI on innovative work behavior and employee performance. Jurnal Manajemen2021; 25(2): 240–254.
48.
MaharaniVTroenaEANoermijatiN. Organizational citizenship behavior role in mediating the effect of transformational leadership, job satisfaction on employee performance: studies in PT bank Syariah Mandiri Malang East Java. Int J Bus Manag2013; 8(17): 1–12.
49.
WangHLawKSHackettRD, et al.Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Australas Mark J2005; 48(3): 420–432.
50.
MangkunegaraAHuddinM. The effect of transformational leadership and job satisfaction on employee performance. ujm2016; 4(4): 189–195.
51.
SchultzTW. Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev1961; 51(1): 1–17.
52.
TeslukPEFarrJLKleinSR. Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. J Creativ Behav1997; 31(1): 27–41.
53.
AmabileTMBarsadeSGMuellerJS, et al.Affect and creativity at work. Adm Sci Q2005; 50(3): 367–403.
WalumbwaFOCropanzanoRHartnellCA. Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: a test of the mediating effects of identification and leader‐member exchange. J Organ Behav2009; 30(8): 1103–1126.
56.
JanssenO. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol2000; 73(3): 287–302.
57.
YuanFWoodmanRW. Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Australas Mark J2010; 53(2): 323–342.
58.
ThomasKWVelthouseBA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manag Rev1990; 15(4): 666–681.
59.
CleggCUnsworthKEpitropakiO, et al.Implicating trust in the innovation process. J Occup Organ Psychol2002; 75(4): 409–422.
60.
WalumbwaFOHartnellCA. Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: the role of relational identification and self-efficacy: transformational leadership and performance. J Occup Organ Psychol2011; 84(1): 153–172.
61.
ZhangXBartolKM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Australas Mark J2010; 53(1): 107–128.
62.
O’ReillyCATushmanML. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. AMP2013; 27(4): 324–338.
63.
OrganDW. Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington books/DC heath and com, 1988.
64.
NoheCHertelG. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analytic test of underlying mechanisms. Front Psychol2017; 8: 1364.
65.
AvolioBJYammarinoFJ. Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels-of-analysis framework. Leadersh Q1990; 1(3): 193–208.
66.
YuklG. Managerial leadership: a review of theory and research. J Manag1989; 15(2): 251–289.
67.
MacKenzieSBPodsakoffPMRichGA. Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. J Acad Market Sci2001; 29(2): 115–134.
68.
OrganDWPodsakoffPMMacKenzieSB. Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage publications, 2005.
69.
HuiCLamSSKSchaubroeckJ. Can good citizens lead the way in providing quality service? A field quasi experiment. Acad Manag J2001; 44(5): 988–995.
70.
WhitingSWPodsakoffPMPierceJR. Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. J Appl Psychol2008; 93(1): 125–139.
71.
BachrachDGBendolyEPodsakoffPM. Attributions of the “causes” of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. J Appl Psychol2001; 86(6): 1285–1293.
72.
AdvaniA. Impact of transformational and transactional leadership styles on employees’ performance of banking sector in Pakistan. Global J Manag Bus: Administration and Management2015; 15(5): 41–50.
73.
CycyotaCSFerranteCJSchroederJM. Corporate social responsibility and employee volunteerism: what do the best companies do?Bus Horiz2016; 59(3): 321–329.
74.
VipraprasthaTSudjaINYuestiA. The effect of transformational leadership and organizational commitment to employee performance with citizenship organization behavior as intervening variables (at PT Sarana Arga Gemeh Amerta in Denpasar City). Int J Cont Res Rev2018; 9(2): 20503–20518.
75.
AkturanAÇekmecelioğluHG. The effects of knowledge sharing and organizational citizenship behaviors on creative behaviors in educational institutions. Proced Soc Behav Sci2016; 235: 342–350.
76.
ShafiMLeiZSongX, et al.The effects of transformational leadership on employee creativity: moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Asia Pac Manag Rev2020; 25(3): 166–176.
77.
PandeyAGuptaVGuptaRK. Spirituality and innovative behaviour in teams: examining the mediating role of team learning. IIMB Management Review2019; 31(2): 116–126.
78.
Abdul-RashidSHSakundariniNRaja GhazillaRA, et al.The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: empirical evidence from Malaysia. Int J Oper Prod Manag2017; 37(2): 182–204.
79.
SilverthorneC. The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leader Organ Dev J2004; 25(7): 592–599.
80.
NaqshbandiMMSinghSKGMaP. The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: a case of Malaysian high-tech sector. IIMB Management Review2016; 28(4): 200–211.
81.
Huey YiingLZaman Bin AhmadK. The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behaviour and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance. Leader Organ Dev J2009; 30(1): 53–86.
82.
HongLZainalSRM. The mediating role of organizational culture (OC) on the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and innovative work behavior (IWB) to employee performance (EP) in education sector of Malaysia. Global Business & Management Research2022; 14(3): 1022–1043.
83.
NovitasariDAsbariMPurwantoA. Tourist satisfaction and performance of tourism industries: how the role of innovative work behaviour, organizational citizenship behaviour?Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research2022; 3(1): 1–12.
84.
PurnomoSHastutiISentosaI. Why does organizational citizenship behaviour affect the organizational sustainability performance of msmes with the role individual work behaviour?2024.
85.
SchunkDHDiBenedettoMK. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp Educ Psychol2020; 60: 101832.
86.
RanjbarMZamaniHAmiriN. The study on relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational productivity. In: International conference on arts, economics and management, Dubai, UAE, 22-23 March 2014, pp. 22–23.
87.
FitrioTSaputraRMIDewiP, et al.The role of innovative citizenship behavior in improving employee performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen2022; 20(2): 263–275.
88.
GünayGY. Relationship between job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: sample of Edirne financial office employees in Turkey. Am Int J Contemp Res2018; 8(1): 64–74.
89.
RitaMRanda PayanganORanteY, et al.Moderating effect of organizational citizenship behavior on the effect of organizational commitment, transformational leadership and work motivation on employee performance. International Journal of Law and Management2018; 60(4): 953–964.
90.
BettencourtLA. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: the direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. J Retailing2004; 80(3): 165–180.
91.
López-DomínguezMEnacheMSallanJM, et al.Transformational leadership as an antecedent of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Res2013; 66(10): 2147–2152.
92.
WangCLAhmedPK. The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur J Innovat Manag2004; 7(4): 303–313.
93.
ArokiasamyARAMaheshwariGNguyenK-L. The influence of ethical and transformational leadership on employee creativity in Malaysia’s private higher education institutions: the mediating role of organizational citizenship behaviour. Interdiscipl J Inf Knowl Manag2022; 17: 1.
94.
MiaoRCaoY. High-performance work system, work well-being, and employee creativity: cross-level moderating role of transformational leadership. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16(9): 1640.
DaviesKALaneAMDevonportTJ, et al.Validity and reliability of a brief emotional intelligence scale (BEIS-10). J Indiv Differ2010; 31(4): 198–208.
97.
DurosiniITribertiSOngaroG, et al.Validation of the Italian version of the brief emotional intelligence scale (BEIS-10). Psychol Rep2021; 124(5): 2356–2376.
98.
OrganDWKonovskyM. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol1989; 74(1): 157–164.
99.
AbrahamR. Emotional intelligence in organizations: a conceptualization. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr1999; 125(2): 209.
100.
KhaliliA. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the moderating role of emotional intelligence. Leader Organ Dev J2017; 38(7): 1004–1015.
101.
ParkeMRSeoM-GSherfEN. Regulating and facilitating: the role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. J Appl Psychol2015; 100(3): 917–934.
102.
LeeCWongC-S. The effect of team emotional intelligence on team process and effectiveness. J Manag Organ2019; 25(6): 844–859.
WongCSLawKS. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly2017; 13(3): 243–274. Routledge.
105.
ElbirouH. Emotional intelligence at the heart of customer orientation: the front-office bank employee perspective. Journal of Trade Science2024; 12(2): 134–152.
106.
DaiYDDaiYYChenKY, et al.Transformational vs transactional leadership: which is better? A study on employees of international tourist hotels in Taipei city. Int J Contemp Hospitality Mngt2013; 25(5): 760–778.
107.
HuM-LMHorngJ-SSunY-HC. Hospitality teams: knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tour Manag2009; 30(1): 41–50.
108.
KehoeRRWrightPM. The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. J Manag2013; 39(2): 366–391.
109.
KaratepeOMUludagOMenevisI, et al.The effects of selected individual characteristics on frontline employee performance and job satisfaction. Tour Manag2006; 27(4): 547–560.
110.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRL, et al.Multivariate data analysis: with readings. 4th ed.Prentice Hall, 1998.
111.
HairJFSarstedtMHopkinsL, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev2014; 26(2): 106–121.
112.
HarmanHH. Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press, 1976.
113.
CooperDRSchindlerP. Business research methods. Mcgraw-Hill Education, 2014.
114.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res1977; 14(3): 396–402.
115.
CohenJD. Noncentral Chi-square: some observations on recurrence. Am Statistician1988; 42(2): 120–122.
116.
LindellMKWhitneyDJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol2001; 86(1): 114–121.
117.
HairJFSarstedtMMatthewsLM, et al.Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. Eur Bus Rev2016; 28: 63–76.
118.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res1981; 18(1): 39–50.
119.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci2015; 43(1): 115–135.
120.
BaronRMKennyDA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol1986; 51(6): 1173–1182.
121.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al.When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev2019; 31(1): 2–24.
122.
ShmueliGSarstedtMHairJF, et al.Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur J Mark2019; 53(11): 2322–2347.
123.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al.A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed.Sage, 2017.
124.
IsmailNZRodzalanSA. The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and innovative work behavior (IWB). Research in Management of Technology and Business2021; 2(1): 91–105.
125.
BaetyNRojuaniahR. Servant leadership, organizational culture and organizational citizenship behavior on innovative work behavior. Management Analysis Journal2022; 11(1): 83–94.
126.
XerriMJBrunettoY. Fostering innovative behaviour: the importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. Int J Hum Resour Manag2013; 24(16): 3163–3177.
127.
CalenCTariganSARositaR, et al.The role of transformational leadership, leader member exchange, digital transformation on organizational citizenship behaviour and work innovation capabilities in during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia2021; 7(2): 203–216.
