Although many researchers of workplace mobbing refer to the similarities with animal mobbing noted by Leymann, animals that attack their enemies remain graphic illustrations in descriptions of workplace violence.
Objective
This study aims to examine the differences and similarities between animal and workplace bullying, identify trends in these studies through bibliometric analysis, and discover which common themes may be helpful for further interdisciplinary research.
Methods
A narrative literature review and bibliometric analysis were used to identify common themes and topics. The data were downloaded from the Scopus database, and 1264 studies published between 1919 and 2024 were examined. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed via the Biblioshiny application of the Bibliometrix package and the VOSviewer program.
Results
Five themes common to both fields of research were identified, including environmental factors influencing mobbing, attacking group mobilization, causes of mobbing attacks, mobbing behavior, and neurophysiological reactions. The two connecting themes (aggression and communication) were also identified, and directions for possible interdisciplinary research were discussed.
Conclusions
By providing comprehensive information on mobbing literature, this study offers a different perspective on what we can learn from animal behavior to understand workplace mobbing better and stimulates an important discussion for future researchers.
CarlsonNVGriesserM. Mobbing in animals: a thorough review and proposed future directions. Adv Stud Behav2022; 54: 1–41.
2.
De LimaHSDLas-CasasFMGRibeiroJR, et al.Ecological and phylogenetic predictors of mobbing behavior in a tropical dry forest. Ecol Evol2018; 8(24): 12615–12628.
3.
LučanRKŠálekM. Observation of successful mobbing of an insectivorous bat, Taphozous nudiventris (Emballonuridae), on an avian predator, Tyto alba (Tytonidae). Mammalia2013; 77(2): 235–236.
4.
KamaliMHosseinpourSSwannJSarehHPMahmoudiM. Academia in mobbing. In: MahmoudiM, editor. A brief guide to academic bullying. Singapore: Jenny Stanford Publishing; 2021. p. 45–60.
5.
MoMWaterhouseDRHaylerP, et al.Observations of mobbing and other agonistic responses to the Powerful Owl Ninox strenua. Aust Zool2016; 38(1): 43–51.
6.
SandovalLWilsonDR. Local predation pressure predicts the strength of mobbing responses in tropical birds. Curr Zool2012; 58(5): 781–790.
7.
SzymkowiakJ. Wood warblers learn to recognize mobbing calls of an unfamiliar species from heterospecific tutors. Anim Behav2021; 171: 1–11.
8.
ErdisEGençOAydınlıS. Mobbing on construction professionals: causes, consequences, and precautions. Int J Constr Manag2021; 21(10): 987–996.
9.
LeymannH. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol1996; 5(2): 165–184.
10.
De ObessoMDLMCapRMárquezOC. Artificial intelligence to manage workplace bullying. J Bus Res2023; 160: 113813.
11.
LorenzK. Der Umwelt des Vogels’deki Der Kumpan. J Ornithol1935; 83(137-213): 289–413.
12.
LeymannHGustafssonA. Mobbing at work and the development of posttraumatic stress disorders. Eur J Work Organ Psychol1996; 5(2): 251–275.
13.
LeedomLJ. Human social behavioral systems: ethological framework for a unified theory. Human Ethology Bulletin2014; 29(1): 39–65.
14.
KarcıoğluFÇelikÜ. Mobbing (yıldırma) ve örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi. Atatürk üniversitesi iktisadi ve idari bilimler dergisi2012; 26(1): 59–75.
15.
TetikS. Mobbing kavramı: birey ve örgütler açısından önemi. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi2010; 2010: 81–89.
16.
CarneroMAMartínezBSánchez-MangasR. Mobbing and its determinants: the case of Spain. Appl Econ2008; 42(29): 3777–3787.
17.
FilizözBAlper AyF. Örgütlerde mobbing ve tükenmişlik olgusu arasındaki ilişkilere yönelik bir araştırma. E-J New World Sci Acad Soc Sci2011; 6(2): 229–241.
18.
VveinhardtJDeikusM. The use of religious resources in helping victims of workplace mobbing. Front Psychol2023; 14: 1288354.
19.
Alper AyF. İstismarcı yönetim, örgütsel mutluluk ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi2022; 10(2): 215–245.
20.
DurmuşSCTopcuIYıldırımA. Mobbing behaviors encountered by nurses and their effects on nurses. Int J Caring Sci2018; 11(2): 905.
21.
KaygısızEG. Mobbing in social media: analyse YouTube and Twitter users’ comments. Bus Manag Stud: Int J2023; 11(1): 226.
22.
VveinhardtJŠtreimikienėD. Demographic, social and organizational characteristics on the levels of mobbing and single cases of harassment: the multicomplex approach. 2017; 20(3): 52–69.
23.
Alper AyFTağrafHÖzkanAM, et al.Sağlık kurumlarında mobbing ve örgütsel sessizliğe etkisi. Akademik Bakış Dergisi2016; 58: 816–837.
24.
DemirciMKÖzlerDEGirginB. Beş faktör kişilik modelinin işyerinde duygusal tacize (mobbing) etkileri-hastane işletmelerinde bir uygulama. Khazar J Humanit Soc Sci2009; 12(2): 13–39.
25.
VveinhardtJDeikusM. Strategies for a nonviolent response to perpetrator actions: what can Christianity offer to targets of workplace mobbing?SetF2023b; 11(2): 175–195.
26.
YıldırımS. Türkiye’de son on yılda işlenen kadın cinayetleri üzerine: sebep, sonuç ve öneriler. Mecmua2018; 6: 1–21.
27.
De AlmeidaRMMCabralJCCNarvaesR. Behavioural, hormonal and neurobiological mechanisms of aggressive behaviour in human and nonhuman primates. Physiol Behav2015; 143: 121–135.
28.
VetulaniJ. Neurochemistry of impulsiveness and aggression. Psychiatr Pol2013; 47(1): 103–115.
29.
WranghamRW. Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2018; 115(2): 245–253.
30.
BakerSJOsanlooAFSherman NewcombW. Women’s ascension to the deanship in an academic bullying culture. In: MullenCA, editor. Handbook of Social Justice Interventions in Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 1–28. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29553-0_133-1.
31.
DutourMLénaJPLengagneT. Mobbing calls: a signal transcending species boundaries. Anim Behav2017; 131: 3–11.
32.
BaştaM. Postmodern toplumlarda kişilerarası iletisim sürecinde psikolojik taciz, yüksek lisans Tezi. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2016.
33.
KapocsiE. Mobbing és bullying az orvosok között - amikor a kollégából ellenség lesz. Lege Artis Med (LAM)2018; 28(6/7): 275–285.
34.
EinarsenS. Harassment and bullying at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggress Violent Behav2000; 5(4): 379–401.
35.
AşkinEÖÖAşkinU. Çalışma yaşamında kadına yönelik mobbing: bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi2018; 9(24): 255–282.
36.
TajuddinIUtamiKAArafatY. The effect of parenting style on bullying behaviour. In: TamarMWaziriA, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Asian Association of Indigenous and Cultural Psychology (ICAAIP2017); 2017.p. 280–284.
37.
RéaleDReaderSMSolD, et al.Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev2007; 82(2): 291–318.
38.
RammsayerTHStahlJSchmigaK. Basic personality dimensions and stress-related coping strategies in victims of workplace bullying. Zeitschrift Fur Personalpsychologie2006; 5: 41–52.
39.
Weingart P. Preface. In: Weingart P, Mitchell SD, Richerson PJ, Maasen S, editors. Human by nature: Between biology and the social sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1997, pp. 1–13.
40.
VaillancourtT. Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci2013; 368(1631): 20130080.
41.
GlasnerAT. Lonnie Athens revisited: the social construction of violence. Aggress Violent Behav2013; 18(2): 1359–1789.
42.
Van den BerghePL. Bridging the paradigms: biology and the social sciences. In: WiegeleTC (ed). Biology and The Social Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge, 1982, pp. 13–28.
43.
VesseyJADeMarcoRDiFazioR. Bullying, harassment, and horizontal violence in the nursing workforce the state of the science. Annu Rev Nurs Res2010; 28(1): 133–157.
44.
SeyranFGürhanN. Eğitim kurumlarında öğrenciler arasında yaygınlaşan şiddet: Okul zorbalığı üzerine bibliyometrik bir araştırma. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi. Dergisi2021; 22(3): 1690–1723. DOI: 10.29299/kefad.938023.
45.
CretuDMMorandauF. Bullying and cyberbullying: a bibliometric analysis of three decades of research in education. Educ Rev2024; 76(2): 371–404.
46.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR. Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev Gen Psychol1997; 1(3): 311–320.
47.
FerrariR. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Med Writ2015; 24(4): 230–235.
48.
Martín-MartínAOrduna-MaleaEThelwallM, et al.Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of informetrics2018; 12(4): 1160–1177.
49.
EchchakouiS. Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. J Market Anal2020; 8: 165–184.
50.
LimWMRasulTKumarS, et al.Past, present, and future of customer engagement. J Bus Res2022; 140: 439–458.
51.
AlperAF. The relationship between work motivation and productivity: bibliometric analysis of articles from 1953 to 2024. Hum Syst Manag2024; 44: 1–22.
52.
AriaMCuccurulloC. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics2017; 11(4): 959–975.
53.
Van EckNJWaltmanL. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNet Explorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics2017; 111(2): 1053–1070.
54.
Fernàndez-CastilloNCormandB. Aggressive behavior in humans: genes and pathways identified through association studies. Am J Med Genet Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics2016; 171(5): 676–696.
55.
DutourMCordonnierMLénaJP, et al.Seasonal variation in mobbing behaviour of passerine birds. J Ornithol2019; 160: 509–514.
56.
LeymannH. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence Vict1990; 5(2): 119–126.
57.
ManneK. Down girl: the logic of misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
TempletonCNGreeneEDavisK. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science2005; 308(5730): 1934–1937.
60.
CurioEErnstUViethW. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing: II. Cultural transmission of enemy recognition in blackbirds: effectiveness and some constraints. Z Tierpsychol1978; 48(2): 184–202.
61.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE, et al.An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualising the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J Informetr2011; 5(1): 146–166.
62.
ClaraETommasiLRogersLJ. Social mobbing calls in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): effects of experience and associated cortisol levels. Anim Cognit2008; 11: 349–358.
63.
HansenÅMGardeAHNabe-NielsenK, et al.Health consequences of workplace bullying: physiological responses and sleep as pathways to disease. In: D’CruzPNoronhaEBaillienE, et al. (eds). Pathways of JobRelated Negative Behaviour. Berlin: Springer, 2021, pp. 129–152.
64.
WeierstallRMoranJGiebelG, et al.Testosterone reactivity and identification with a perpetrator or a victim in a story are associated with attraction to violence-related cues. Int J Law Psychiatr2014; 37(3): 304–312.
65.
PotegalMNordmanJC. Non-angry aggressive arousal and angriffsberietschaft: a narrative review of the phenomenology and physiology of proactive/offensive aggression motivation and escalation in people and other animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2023; 147: 105–110.
66.
SamnaniAKSinghP. 20 years of workplace bullying research: a review of the antecedents and consequences of bullying in the workplace. Aggress Violent Behav2012; 17(6): 581–589.
67.
GuptaSAgrawalASaxenaK. Defense strategies in birds of Charadriidae family. Proc Zool Soc2022; 75(4): 395–412.
68.
DutourMKasperJRidleyAR. Transfer of information between a highly social species and heterospecific community members. Behav Ecol Sociobiol2021; 75: 1–11.
69.
BuunkAPDijkstraP. The social animal within organisations. In: RobertsSC (ed.). Applied evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 36–51.
70.
BarneRLowreyKGordonPA, et al.Using animal metaphors to create and maintain positive changes in the workforce. J Divers Manag2013; 8(2): 51.
71.
Gülsün ŞirinS. Enneagram metodolojisi tekniğine göre okul yöneticilerinin mizaç dağılımının karşılaştırılmalı olarak incelenmesi. Master’s thesis. İstanbul: İstanbul okan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2019.
72.
KirazS. “Hayvan” da ve “İnsan” da saldırganlık üzerine psikolojik ve felsefi bir inceleme. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi2015; 19(1): 119–136.
73.
CorrPJPerkinsAM. The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: from Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. Int J Psychophysiol2006; 62(3): 367–376.
74.
AkpanB.Classical and operant conditioning—Ivan Pavlov; Burrhus Skinner. In: AkpanBKennedyTJ, editors. Science education in theory and practice. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. [sayfa numarası]. (Springer Texts in Education). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_6.
75.
SmithMFWatzekJBrosnanSF. The importance of a truly comparative methodology for comparative psychology. Int J Comp Psychol2018; 31: 37777.
76.
NielsenMBEinarsenSV. What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: an overview of the literature and agenda for future research. Aggress Violent Behav2018; 42: 71–83.
77.
RajalingamDNymoenINybergH, et al.Workplace bullying increases the risk of anxiety through a stress-induced β2-adrenergic receptor mechanism: a multisource study employing an animal model, cell culture experiments and human data. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2021; 94(6): 1905–1915.
78.
CoyneIGopaulAMCampbellM, et al.Bystander responses to bullying at work: the role of mode, type and relationship to target. J Bus Ethics2019; 157: 813–827.
79.
TahaAAD. Internal auditors’ independence under workplace bullying stress: an investigative study. J Islam Account Bus Res2024; 15(5): 762–783.
80.
ZambranoPTorresJAnchundiaC, et al.Mobbing: AI-powered cyberthreat behavior analysis and modeling. In: 2024 8th Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet), Paris, France, December 2024, pp. 278–281. DOI: 10.1109/CSNet64211.2024.10851721.
81.
BalducciCConwayPMvan HeugtenK. The contribution of organizational factors to workplace bullying, emotional abuse and harassment. In: D’CruzP (ed). Pathways of Job-related Negative Behaviour. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment. Singapore: Springer, 2021, vol 2, pp. 3–28.
82.
HutchinsonM. Bullying as workgroup manipulation: a model for understanding patterns of victimisation and contagion within the workgroup. J Nurs Manag2013; 21(3): 563–571.
83.
BranchSRamsaySBarkerM. Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: a review. Int J Manag Rev2013; 15(3): 280–299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00339.x.
84.
HutchinsonJ. Rethinking workplace bullying as an employment relations problem. J Ind Relat2012; 54(5): 637–652.
85.
SischkaPESchmidtAFSteffgenG. The effect of competition and passive avoidant leadership style on the occurrence of workplace bullying. Pers Rev2021; 50(2): 535–559.
86.
DutourMLenaJPLengagneT. Mobbing behaviour varies according to predator dangerousness and occurrence. Anim Behav2016; 119: 119–124.
87.
PereiraLCDuarteRBMaiorRS, et al.Natural predator and a human stimulus differently affect the behavior, cortisol and cerebral hemisphere activity of marmoset monkeys. Physiol Behav2018; 195: 112–117.
