Authentic leadership is crucial during the succession phase of a family business, as it helps employees adapt to change more effectively. Thus, developing a clear portrait of an authentic leader becomes essential to guide the business through this pivotal phase.
Objective
This study aims to explore authentic leadership in family SMEs using a resource-based approach, with inputs like leaders’ psychological capital, social intelligence, and family culture. It also examines how authentic leadership moderates the link between employees’ psychological ownership and readiness for organisational change.
Methods
A multilevel model was used, based on data collected from 107 leaders and 693 employees in Vietnamese family SMEs.
Results
The findings reveal that psychological capital, social intelligence, and family culture play a critical role in shaping authentic leadership. Moreover, by leveraging the potential for change, authentic leaders can amplify the positive aspects of psychological ownership, fostering greater employee readiness for organisational change.
Conclusions
This study portrays an authentic leader who aids family businesses in smooth generational transitions while also strengthening the link between psychological ownership and readiness for organisational change, which has been unclear in past research.
PorfírioJAFelícioJACarrilhoT. Family business succession: analysis of the drivers of success based on entrepreneurship theory. J Bus Res2020; 115: 250–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.054.
2.
AbdullahHOAtshanNAl-AbrrowH, et al.Leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy in family business: modeling non-compensatory and nonlinear relationships. J Fam Bus Manag2023; 13(4): 1104–1131. DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-09-2022-0113.
3.
MatiasCFrancoM. Family protocol: how it shapes succession in family firms. J Bus Strategy2020; 41(3): 35–44. DOI: 10.1108/JBS-09-2018-0167.
4.
GardnerWLKaramEPAlvessonM, et al.Authentic leadership theory: the case for and against. Leadersh Q2021; 32(6): 101495. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101495.
5.
LuthansFBroadJD. Positive psychological capital to help combat the mental health fallout from the pandemic and VUCA environment. Organ Dyn2022; 51(2): 100817. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100817.
6.
AppelsM. CEO sociopolitical activism as a signal of authentic leadership to prospective employees. J Manag2023; 49(8): 2727–2765. DOI: 10.1177/01492063221110207.
7.
AhmedEI. A systematic review of authentic leadership literature in educational research from 1997 to 2021. Educ Manag Adm Leader2024; 52(6): 1276–1314. DOI: 10.1177/17411432221120467.
8.
WangXLiuYPengZ, et al.Situational leadership theory in nursing management: a scoping review. BMC Nurs2024; 23(1): 930. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02582-9.
9.
CrawfordJADawkinsSMartinA, et al.Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: reconceptualising and rethinking leaders. Aust J Manag2020; 45(1): 114–133. DOI: 10.1177/0312896219836460.
10.
InanI. Exploring the social intelligence impact on job engagement: a research study on generation X women entrepreneurs at TR62 region. In: Kars-ÜnlüoğluSÇangarlıBGGaggiottiH, et al. (eds). Eastern Perspectives on Women’s Roles and Advancement in Business ed: IGI Global. Pennsylvania: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2022, pp. 176–204. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8742-3.ch009.
11.
HsiehJ-K. The impact of influencers' multi-SNS use on followers’ behavioral intentions: an integration of cue consistency theory and social identity theory. J Retailing Consum Serv2023; 74: 103397. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103397.
12.
AstrachanJHBinz AstrachanCCampopianoG, et al.Values, spirituality and religion: family business and the roots of sustainable ethical behavior. J Bus Ethics2020; 163(4): 637–645. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04392-5.
13.
AlshormanSAAMelhemYS. The use of optimistic tone by ethical firms’ leaders. Jordan Journal of Business Administration2023; 19(2): 1049. DOI: 10.35516/jjba.v19i2.1049.
14.
ErdoganIRondiEDe MassisA. Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: a family imprinting perspective. Entrep Theory Pract2020; 44(1): 20–54. DOI: 10.1177/1042258719839712.
15.
HuQHughesM. Radical innovation in family firms: a systematic analysis and research agenda. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res2020; 26(6): 1199–1234. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0658.
16.
CocieruOCLyleMCHindmanLC, et al.The ‘dark side’of psychological ownership during times of change. J Change Manag2019; 19(4): 266–282. DOI: 10.1080/14697017.2019.1584121.
17.
Diaz-MorianaVClintonEKammerlanderN, et al.Innovation motives in family firms: a transgenerational view. Entrep Theory Pract2020; 44(2): 256–287. DOI: 10.1177/1042258718803051.
18.
OlafsenAHNilsenERSmedsrudS, et al.Sustainable development through commitment to organizational change: the implications of organizational culture and individual readiness for change. J Workplace Learn2021; 33(3): 180–196. DOI: 10.1108/JWL-05-2020-0093.
19.
LeyerMHirzelA-KMoormannJ. IT’S mine, I decide what to change: the role of psychological ownership in EMPLOYEES’PROCESS innovation behaviour. Int J Innov Mgt2021; 25(01): 2150013. DOI: 10.1142/s1363919621500134.
20.
SenguptaSBajajBSinghA, et al.Innovative work behavior driving Indian startups go global–the role of authentic leadership and readiness for change. J Organ Change Manag2023; 36(1): 162–179. DOI: 10.1108/jocm-05-2022-0156.
21.
LeCounteJF. Founder-CEOs: succession planning for the success, growth, and legacy of family firms. J Small Bus Manag2022; 60(3): 616–633. DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2020.1725814.
22.
CivelekMKljučnikovAFialovaV, et al.How innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differ depending on their characteristics?Equilibrium2021; 16(2): 413–428. DOI: 10.24136/eq.2021.015.
23.
KellyL. Entrepreneurship, mindfulness, and authentic leadership. In: DhimanSRobertsGECrossmanJ (eds). Mindfulness for Authentic Leadership: Theory and Cases. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, pp. 275–286. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-34677-4_16.
24.
ConzELambPWDe MassisA. Practicing resilience in family firms: an investigation through phenomenography. Journal of Family Business Strategy2020; 11(2): 100355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100355.
25.
KelemenTKMatthewsSHBreevaartK. Leading day-to-day: a review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. Leadersh Q2020; 31(1): 101344. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344.
26.
FriesAKammerlanderNLeitterstorfM. Leadership styles and leadership behaviors in family firms: a systematic literature review. Journal of Family Business Strategy2021; 12(1): 100374. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100374.
27.
TomásJMGutiérrezMGeorgievaS, et al.The effects of self-efficacy, hope, and engagement on the academic achievement of secondary education in the Dominican Republic. Psychol Sch2020; 57(2): 191–203. DOI: 10.1002/pits.22321.
28.
QiuHFreelM. Managing family-related conflicts in family businesses: a review and research agenda. Fam Bus Rev2020; 33(1): 90–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.06.004.
29.
BaykalE. Succession in family business through authentic leadership. In: Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurial Leadership and Competitive Strategy in Family Business. Pennsylvania: IGI Global2019: 436–451. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8012-6.ch021.
30.
LuthansFYoussef-MorganCM. Psychological capital: an evidence-based positive approach. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2017; 4: 339–366. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324.
31.
MastenAS. Resilience theory and research on children and families: past, present, and promise. J Fam Theory Rev2018; 10(1): 12–31. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12255.
32.
JaworskiMPanczykMLenczuk-GrubaA, et al.The trend of authentic leadership skills in nursing education: the key role of perfectionism and self-efficacy. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2022; 19(4): 1989. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041989.
33.
CrowneKA. The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence. J Manag Organ2009; 6(3): 148–163. DOI: 10.1057/omj.2009.20.
34.
JiangHShenH. Toward a relational theory of employee engagement: understanding authenticity, transparency, and employee behaviors. Int J Bus Commun2023; 60(3): 948–975. DOI: 10.1177/2329488420954236.
35.
GargNJainAPuniaB. Gratitude, social intelligence, and leadership among university teachers: mediation and moderation analysis. Int J Organ Anal2021; 29(2): 368–388. DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-01-2020-2016.
36.
HouseRJavidanMHangesP, et al.Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. J World Bus2002; 37(1): 3–10. DOI: 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4.
37.
HallAMelinLNordqvistM. Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: exploring the role of cultural patterns. Fam Bus Rev2001; 14(3): 193–208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00193.x.
38.
GodlewskiCJLeHN. Family ties and firm performance empirical evidence from East Asia. Q Rev Econ Finance2024; 94: 150–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2024.01.008.
39.
SteffensNKWolyniecNOkimotoTG, et al.Knowing me, knowing us: personal and collective self-awareness enhances authentic leadership and leader endorsement. Leadersh Q2021; 32(6): 101498. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/z2r7f.
40.
PierceJLKostovaTDirksKT. The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Rev Gen Psychol2003; 7(1): 84–107. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84.
41.
RauSBWernerASchellS. Psychological ownership as a driving factor of innovation in older family firms. J Family Bus Str2019; 10(4): 100246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.001.
42.
HenssenBKoiranenM. CEOs’ joy of working for the family firm: the role of psychological ownership and stewardship behavior. Enterp Res J2021; 11(3): 191–218. DOI: 10.1515/erj-2019-0264.
43.
WeinerBJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. In: Handbook on implementation science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, pp. 215–232. DOI: 10.4337/9781788975995.00015.
44.
GraySMKnightAPBaerM. On the emergence of collective psychological ownership in new creative teams. Organ Sci2020; 31(1): 141–164. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2019.1307.
45.
ShuklaA. Soldier or actor? The role of psychological ownership as a marker for genuine citizenship behaviour. Int J Organ Anal2019; 27(1): 94–108. DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-08-2017-1214.
46.
KromahMDAyokoOBAshkanasyNM. Commitment to organizational change: the role of territoriality and change-related self-efficacy. J Bus Res2024; 174: 114499. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114499.
47.
ChenY-SLienC-MLoW-Y, et al.Sustainability of positive psychological status in the workplace: the influence of organizational psychological ownership and psychological capital on police officers’ behavior. Sustainability2021; 13(5): 2689. DOI: 10.3390/su13052689.
48.
BrundinEMcClatcheyISMelinL. Leaving the family business: the dynamics of psychological ownership. J Fam Busin Str2023; 14(2): 100555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2023.100555.
49.
KurtL. Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Hum Relat1947; 1(1): 5–41. DOI: 10.1177/001872674700100103.
50.
BakariHHunjraAINiaziGSK. How does authentic leadership influence planned organizational change? The role of employees’ perceptions: integration of theory of planned behavior and Lewin's three step model. J Change Manag2017; 17(2): 155–187. DOI: 10.1080/14697017.2017.1299370.
51.
LabragueLJAlSSAl RawajfahO, et al.Authentic leadership and nurses' motivation to engage in leadership roles: the mediating effects of nurse work environment and leadership self‐efficacy. J Nurs Manag2021; 29(8): 2444–2452. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13448.
52.
ZhangYLiuGZhangL, et al.Psychological ownership: a meta-analysis and comparison of multiple forms of attachment in the workplace. J Manag2021; 47(3): 745–770. DOI: 10.1177/0149206320917195.
53.
TannerSPrayagGKuntzJC. Psychological capital, social capital and organizational resilience: a Herringbone Model perspective. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct2022; 78: 103149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2023.100555.
54.
LorenzTBeerCPützJ, et al.Measuring psychological capital: construction and validation of the compound PsyCap scale (CPC-12). PLoS One2016; 11(4): e0152892. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152892.
55.
SilveraDMartinussenMDahlT. The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scand J Psychol2001; 42(4): 313–319. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00242.
56.
SmithDHairJJFFergusonK. An investigation of the effect of family influence on Commitment–Trust in retailer–vendor strategic partnerships. J Fam Busin Str2014; 5(3): 252–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.11.005.
57.
TateB. A longitudinal study of the relationships among self-monitoring, authentic leadership, and perceptions of leadership. J Leader Organ Stud2008; 15(1): 16–29. DOI: 10.1177/1548051808318002.
58.
AveyJBAvolioBJCrossleyCD, et al.Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. J Organ Behav2009; 30(2): 173–191. DOI: 10.1002/job.583.
59.
HoltDTArmenakisAAFeildHS, et al.Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale. J Appl Behav Sci2007; 43(2): 232–255. DOI: 10.1177/0021886306295295.
60.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al.When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev2019; 31(1): 2–24. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
61.
GillJJohnsonP. Research methods for managers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2010.
62.
HoyleRHGottfredsonNC. Sample size considerations in prevention research applications of multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling. Prev Sci2015; 16: 987–996. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-014-0489-8.
63.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci2015; 43: 115–135. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
64.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88(5): 879–903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
65.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge, 2013. DOI: 10.4324/9780203771587.
66.
HoxJMoerbeekMVan de SchootR. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. New York: Routledge, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315650982.
67.
PaccagnellaO. Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Eval Rev2006; 30(1): 66–85. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X05275649.
68.
BarberaFShiHXAgarwalA, et al.The family that prays together stays together: toward a process model of religious value transmission in family firms. J Bus Ethics2020; 163(4): 661–673. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04382-7.
69.
SuhartantoE. The mediating effect of family business self-efficacy on parental support and succession intention relationship. J Fam Bus Manag2023; 13(4): 905–922. DOI: 10.1108/jfbm-03-2022-0035.
70.
KeytA. Myths and mortals: family business leadership and succession planning. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. DOI: 10.1002/9781118932285.fmatter.
71.
MillerSP. Next-generation leadership development in family businesses: the critical roles of shared vision and family climate. Front Psychol2014; 5: 1335. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01335.
72.
ElsBJacobsM. Unravelling the interplay of authentic leadership, emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence and psychological well-being. SA J Ind Psychol2023; 49: 2095. DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v49i0.2095.
73.
MalikMFBurhanQ-u-AKhanMA. The role of HEXACO in the development of authentic leadership and its consequences on task performance. Leader Organ Dev J2023; 44(1): 52–71. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-08-2022-0356.
74.
RoseckáNMachekO. Non-family members and conflict processes in family firms: a systematic review of literature. J Bus Econ2022; 92(2): 235–281. DOI: 10.1007/s11573-021-01054-9.
75.
MatserIBoumaJVeldhuizenE. No hard feelings? Non-succeeding siblings and their perceptions of justice in family firms. J Fam Bus Manag2020, (ahead-of-print).
76.
ChenJKSriphonT. Authentic leadership, trust, and social exchange relationships under the influence of leader behavior. Sustainability2022; 14(10): 5883. DOI: 10.3390/su14105883.
77.
Azila-GbettorEMNovietoDTTulasiEE, et al.Citizenship fatigue and employee commitment: moderating role of psychological ownership among artisans of family-owned construction firms. International Journal of Construction Management2024; 24(9): 975–985. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2239505.
78.
KalbermattenCJ. Employee readiness for change: examining the combined effects of individual and organizational demands in public school reform. Int J Public Sect Manag2024; 37(5): 613–629. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2023-0230.
79.
KalkanÜAltınay AksalFAltınay GaziZ, et al.The relationship between school administrators’ leadership styles, school culture, and organizational image. Sage Open2020; 10(1): 2158244020902081. DOI: 10.1177/2158244020902081.
80.
Samwel MugunaH. Authentic leadership and societal transformation: a review of literature. International Journal of Organizational Leadership2022; 11(3): 333–356. DOI: 10.33844/ijol.2022.60333.
81.
AriciHEArasliHCakmakoglu AriciN. The effect of nepotism on tolerance to workplace incivility: mediating role of psychological contract violation and moderating role of authentic leadership. Leader Organ Dev J2020; 41(4): 597–613. DOI: 10.1108/lodj-06-2019-0250.
82.
LupșaDVîrgaDMaricuțoiuLP, et al.Increasing psychological capital: a pre-registered meta-analysis of controlled interventions. Appl Psychol2020; 69(4): 1506–1556. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12219.
83.
RenzulliJS. Operation houndstooth: a positive perspective on developing social intelligence 1. In: Tassel-BaskaJVCrossTLRichardF (eds). Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students. 1 ed.New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 79–112. DOI: 10.4324/9781003238065.
84.
BauerK. To be or not to be authentic. In defence of authenticity as an ethical ideal. Ethical Theory Moral Pract2017; 20(3): 567–580. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-017-9803-4.
85.
DawkinsSTianAWNewmanA, et al.Psychological ownership: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav2017; 38(2): 163–183. DOI: 10.1002/job.2057.
86.
BaqueroA. Authentic leadership, employee work engagement, trust in the leader, and workplace well-being: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag2023; 16: 1403–1424. DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s407672.
87.
BellRPhamTT. Modelling the knowledge transfer process between founder and successor in Vietnamese family businesses succession. J Fam Bus Manag2021; 11(4): 479–495. DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-03-2020-0024.
88.
ArunKKahraman GedikN. Impact of Asian cultural values upon leadership roles and styles. Int Rev Adm Sci2022; 88(2): 428–448. DOI: 10.1177/0020852320935982.
89.
BennedsenMLuYCMehrotraV. A survey of Asian family business research. Asia-Pac J of Fin Stud2022; 51(1): 7–43. DOI: 10.1111/ajfs.12363.
