While there is extensive research on leadership’s role in fostering proactive behavior among, only a few studies have examined the link between inclusive leadership (IL) and followers’ challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behavior (COCB). This relationship remains largely unexplored in the information and technology industry, where the challenges are unprecedented, and creativity is essential for survival.
Objective
The study aims to validate the proposed association between IL and COCB in the context of IT industry. Moreover, this research introduces creative self-efficacy (CSE) as a mediator and organizational innovative climate (IC) as moderator, deepening the understanding of the mechanisms further.
Design/Methodology
Cross-sectional study was conducted on 321 respondents employed in IT industry. To test our hypotheses, SEM analysis was conducted to measure the path coefficients, followed by bootstrapping analysis to assess the indirect impacts of creative self-efficacy at work.
Results
The findings indicate that inclusive leadership promote subordinates’ COCB directly, as well as through enhancing CSE, and these relationship are stronger in organizational IC.
Conclusion
Managers should promote inclusive leadership through HR practices and training, select leaders with inclusive traits, and foster an innovative climate with regular cross-departmental events to boost challenge-oriented OCB and organizational effectiveness.
LiZChenKMengQ, et al.Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors among nurses: the influence of perceived inclusive leadership and organizational justice in high-intensity work environment. J Nurs Manag2024; 2024(1): 3032694–3032710.
2.
LiYXieW. Linking change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior to turnover intention: effects of servant leadership and career commitment. Public Pers Manag2022; 51(1): 3–23.
3.
ChenLLuoFZhuX, et al.Inclusive leadership promotes challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behavior through the mediation of work engagement and moderation of organizational innovative atmosphere. Front Psychol2020; 11: 560594.
4.
MackenzieSBPodsakoffPMPodsakoffNP. Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line?Pers Psychol2011; 64(3): 559–592.
5.
LiYWangF. Challenge stressors from using social media for work and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of public service motivation and job involvement. Gov Inf Q2022; 39(4): 101741.
6.
Hoang Nguyen TranQ. Impact of Michigan leadership behaviors on organizational citizenship behaviors in Vietnamese primary schools: the mediating effect of organizational justice and person-organization fit. Sage Open2024; 14(2): 21582440241259017.
7.
AlwaliJ. Innovative work behavior and psychological empowerment: the importance of inclusive leadership on faculty members in Iraqi higher education institutions. J Organ Change Manag2024; 37(2): 374–390.
8.
NembhardIMEdmondsonAC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav2006; 27(7): 941–966.
9.
CarmeliAReiter-PalmonRZivE. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creat Res J2010; 22(3): 250–260.
10.
YounasAWangDJavedB, et al.Moving beyond the mechanistic structures: the role of inclusive leadership in developing change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviour. Can J Adm Sci2021; 38(1): 42–52.
11.
RandelAEGalvinBMShoreLM, et al.Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum Resour Manag Rev2018; 28(2): 190–203.
12.
AboramadanMDahleezKAFaraoC. Inclusive leadership and extra-role behaviors in higher education: does organizational learning mediate the relationship?Int J Educ Manag2021; 36(4): 397–418.
13.
AlessandriGFilosaLEisenbergN, et al.Within-individual relations of emotional, social, and work self-efficacy beliefs to organizational citizenship behaviors. J Res Pers2021; 91: 104073.
14.
TierneyPFarmerSM. Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad Manag J2002; 45(6): 1137–1148.
15.
ChoiJN. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. J Organ Behav2007; 28(4): 467–484.
16.
ModlibaRFischerSBTreffersT, et al.Translating leader–member exchange to innovative work behaviour: the role of creative self-efficacy and team support for innovation. Creativ Innovat Manag2024; 33(4): 567–838.
17.
Bos-NehlesACVeenendaalAA. Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate. Int J Hum Resour Manag2019; 30(18): 2661–2683.
18.
Masry-HerzallahADa’asR. Cultural values, school innovative climate and organizational affective commitment: a study of Israeli teachers. Int J Educ Manag2021; 35(2): 496–512.
19.
PuniAHiltonSKMohammedI, et al.The mediating role of innovative climate on the relationship between transformational leadership and firm performance in developing countries: the case of Ghana. Leader Organ Dev J2022; 43(3): 404–421.
20.
SchneiderB. Organizational climates: an essay. Pers Psychol1975; 28(4): 447–479.
21.
JavedBFatimaTKhanAK, et al.Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of creative self-efficacy. J Creat Behav2021; 55(3): 769–782.
22.
HobfollSE. Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol1989; 44(3): 513–524.
23.
HobfollSEHalbeslebenJNeveuJ-P, et al.Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2018; 5(1): 103–128.
24.
ChouSY. A theoretical analysis of immigrant employees’ organizational citizenship behaviors in organizations. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research2018; 6(2): 209–225.
25.
StoverinkACChiaburuDSLiN, et al.Supporting team citizenship: the influence of team social resources on team-level affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented behaviour. Human Res Mgmt Journal2018; 28(2): 201–215.
26.
ShafaeiANejatiM. Creating meaningful work for employees: the role of inclusive leadership. Hum Resour Dev Q2024; 35(2): 189–211.
27.
SokroEObuobisa-DarkoTDogbe ZungbeyOD. Enhancing organizational development: the role of green empowerment and participation and inclusive leadership after COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open2023; 8(1): 100756.
28.
AhmedFHuWArslanA, et al.Ambidexterity of HR practices in fortune 500 companies and employee innovation performance: mediating role of inclusive leadership. J Organ Change Manag2024; 37(2): 237–254.
29.
StavrouEKafaA. School principals’ leadership styles on implementing inclusive education: the entrepreneurial leadership effect. Int J Educ Manag2023; 38(1): 40–56.
30.
SiguawJASimpsonPMEnzCA. Conceptualizing innovation orientation: a framework for study and integration of innovation research. J Prod Innov Manage2006; 23(6): 556–574.
31.
JanGZainalSRMLataL. Enhancing innovative work behaviour: the role of servant leadership and creative self-efficacy. Horizon: Int J Law Fam2021; 29(2): 33–51.
32.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev1977; 84(2): 191–215.
33.
OuyangR-GLongYZhangJ-Q, et al.Interventions for improving self-efficacy in patients after stroke based on self-efficacy-related principles of Bandura’s cognition theory: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil2023; 30(8): 820–832.
34.
AnastasiuLGavrişOMaierD. Is human capital ready for change? A strategic approach adapting Porter’s five forces to human resources. Sustainability2020; 12(6): 2300.
35.
MirzaMZQaiserMIMemonMA. High-performance work systems, psychological empowerment and creative process engagement: a componential theory of creativity perspective. Creat Innov Manage2024; 33(2): 166–180.
36.
RiceDBYoungNCJTaylorRM, et al.Politics and race in the workplace: understanding how and when trump-supporting managers hinder black employees from thriving at work. Hum Resour Manag J2024; 35: 256–275.
37.
ZhouJGeorgeJM. Awakening employee creativity: the role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadersh Q2003; 14(4–5): 545–568.
38.
BanthaTSahniSP. The relation of servant leadership with followers’ organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB): mediating role of generalized self-efficacy (GSE) and organization–based self-esteem (OBSE). Ind Commerc Train2021; 53(4): 331–342.
39.
PramezwaryALemyDMDjakasaputraA, et al.The role of job characteristics, organizational citizenship behavior, self-efficacy in the relationship to employee performance. International Journal of Social Science and Business2022; 6(4): 486–495.
40.
HobfollSE. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. J Occup Organ Psychol2011; 84(1): 116–122.
41.
DaiQDaiYZhangC, et al.The influence of personal motivation and innovative climate on innovative behavior: evidence from university students in China. Psychol Res Behav Manag2022; 15: 2343–2355.
42.
Bos-NehlesACVeenendaalAAR. Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate. Int J Hum Resour Manag2019; 30(18): 2661–2683.
43.
BaccarellaCVMaierLMeinelM, et al.The effect of organizational support for creativity on innovation and market performance: the moderating role of market dynamism. J Manuf Technol Manag2022; 33(4): 827–849.
Abdel AzizHHRizkallahA. Effect of organizational factors on employees’ generation of innovative ideas: empirical study on the Egyptian software development industry. EuroMed J Bus2015; 10(2): 134–146.
46.
SinghSKGuptaSBussoD, et al.Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J Bus Res2021; 128: 788–798.
47.
LiuYShiJ. The development of organizational innovative atmosphere questionnaire. Industr Eng Manag2009; 14: 105–112.
48.
ShahSJShahSAAUllahR, et al.Deviance due to fear of victimization: “emotional intelligence” a game-changer. Int J Conflict Manag2020; 31(5): 687–707.
49.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed.New York City: Guilford Publications, 2015.
50.
HairJFHultGTMRingleC, et al.A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.
51.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res1981; 18: 39–50.
52.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88(5): 879–903.
PopaSSoto-AcostaPMartinez-ConesaI. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Technol Forecast Soc Change2017; 118: 134–142.
57.
JhaINPalDSarkarS. Thriving in diversity: the role of inclusive leadership and workplace inclusion in enhancing satisfaction with life among Indian IT employees. J Manag Dev2024; 43(5): 663–689.
58.
XiaJXuHXieL. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in proactive behavior at the workplace: the mediating role of gratitude. Baltic J Manag2024; 19(2): 200–217.
