The literature regarding the relationship between HRM and customer orientation in the service context largely ignores the processes and expected management actions outside marketing, and particularly within Human Resource Management. This has hampered the wider adoption of the Service Profit Chain (SPC) model. The present article is an attempt to rectify this problem; it draws on intellectual capital literature and the group psychology theory pioneered by Mary Follett to propose the Intellectual Capital Profit Chain (ICPC) model.
Objective
The paper links HRM and intellectual capital to the key marketing variables of customer orientation, customer satisfaction and to business performance in a full model that has not previously been presented.
Results
The ICPC model recasts intra- and inter-organizational activities as contributing to the accumulation of intellectual capital, in turn driving both engagement and customer orientation.
Conclusions
The development of the ICPC model forms the main contribution of this paper as it can serve as a framework for building and managing HRM configurations that align with human, social, and organizational capital to promote customer orientation.
RobledoM. Building an integral metatheory of management. Eur Manag J2014; 32(4): 535–546. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.10.008.
2.
NoruziMR. Human resource management and customer relationship management (HRM & CRM). SSRN Electron J2017; 2–4. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.986189.
3.
ChoYChoiY. When and how does sustainable HRM improve customer orientation of frontline employees? Satisfaction, empowerment, and communication. Sustainability. Sustainability2021; 13(7): 36–93. DOI: 10.3390/su13073693.
4.
TrunkCNZahidRSamreenH, et al.The interplay among employee resilience, sustainable HRM and work engagement. Hum Syst Manag2024; l: 1–15.
5.
KohliAKJaworskiBJ. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Market1990; 54(2): 1–18. DOI: 10.2307/1251866.
6.
NarverJCSlaterSF. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J Market1990; 54(4): 20–35. DOI: 10.2307/1251757.
7.
CanoCRCarrillatFAJaramilloF. A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents. Int J Res Market2004; 21(2): 179–200. DOI: 10.1177/205157070702200103.
8.
EllisPD. Market orientation and performance: a meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons. J Manag Stud2006; 43(5): 1089–1107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00630.x.
9.
PekovicSRollandS. L’impact de I’orientation client sur la performance des entreprises françaises: étude empirique des effets directs et modérateurs. Rech Appl Market2012; 7(4): 11–38. DOI: 10.1177/076737011202700402.
10.
HogreveJIsekeADerfussK. The service-profit chain: reflections, revisions, and reimaginations. J Serv Res2022; 25(3): 460–477. DOI: 10.1177/10946705211052410.
11.
HomburgCWiesekeJHoyerWD. Social identity and the service-profit chain. J Market2009; 73(2): 38–54. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.73.2.38.
12.
JaakkolaE. Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Rev2018; 10: 18–26.
13.
HolyoakKJ. An analogical framework for literary interpretation. Poetics1982; 11(2): 105–126.
14.
MicheauxALCriéDMartin-SalernoA, et al.The importance of being earnest in social media. J Mark Trends2018; 5(1): 75–93.
15.
FollettMP. Creative experience. New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Company, 1924.
16.
MassaroMMasFDBontisN, et al.Intellectual capital and performance in temporary teams. Manag Decis2020; 58(3): 410–427. DOI: 10.1108/MD-02-2019-0219.
17.
GuestDE. Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Hum Resour Manag J2011; 21(1): 3–13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x.
18.
HeskettJLJonesTOLovemanGW, et al.Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harv Bus Rev1994; 72(2): 164–174.
19.
HogreveJIsekeADerfussK, et al.The service–profit chain: a meta analytic test of a comprehensive theoretical framework. J Market2017; 81(3): 41–61. DOI: 10.1509/jm.15.0395.
20.
SaxeRWeitzBA. The SOCO scale: a measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. J Market Res1982; 19(3): 343–351. DOI: 10.2307/3151568.
21.
BeardenWONetemeyerRGTeelJE. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J Consum Res1989; 15(4): 473–481.
22.
MouritsenJLarsenHTBukhPND. Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Account Org Soc2001; 26: 735–762. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00022-8.
23.
BanduraA. Social learning theory. New York, NY: Prentice Hall, 1971.
24.
TerhoHMeroJSiutlaL, et al.Digital content marketing in business markets: activities, consequences, and contingencies along the customer journey. Ind Market Manag2022; 105: 294–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.006.
25.
MurthyVMouritsenJ. The performance of intellectual capital: mobilising relationships between intellectual and financial capital in a bank. Account Audit Account J2011; 24(5): 622–646. DOI: 10.1108/09513571111139120.
26.
PucciTSimoniCZanniL. Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance. J Manag Govern2015; 19(3): 589–616. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-013-9278-1.
27.
YoundtMASnellSA. Human resource configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance. J Manag Issues2004; 16(3): 337–360.
28.
EricksonGSRothbergHN. Intellectual capital in business-to-business markets. Ind Market Manag2009; 38(2): 159–165. DOI: 10.1108/eb046412.
29.
SubramaniamMYoundtMA. The influence of intellectual capital on the type of innovative capabilities. Acad Manag J2005; 48(1): 450–463. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2005.17407911.
30.
BaxterRMatearS. Measuring intangible value in business-to-business buyer–seller relationships: an intellectual capital perspective. Ind Market Manag2004; 33(6): 491–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.01.008.
31.
TyskboD. Managers’ views on how intellectual capital is recognized and managed in practice: a multiple case study of four Swedish firms. J Intellect Cap2019; 20(2): 282–304. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-01-2018-0017.
32.
BourdieuP. The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 1986.
33.
EdvinssonLMaloneM. Intellectual capital: realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1997.
34.
AdlerPSKwonSW. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev2002; 27(1): 17–40. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2002.5922314.
35.
BontisN. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Manag Decis1998; 36(2): 63–76. DOI: 10.1108/00251749810204142.
36.
PalmatierRWDantRPGrewalD, et al.Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. J Market2006; 70(4): 136–153. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.13.
37.
BamahrosH. The effect of audit committee chair characteristics on intellectual capital performance in banks: evidence from an emerging economy. The Journal Dimensión Empresarial2021; 19(3): P1–P24.
38.
KimTHendersonACEomTH. At the front line: examining the effects of perceived job significance, employee commitment, and job involvement on public service motivation. Int Rev Adm Sci2015; 81(1): 713–733. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314558028.
39.
EvaNRobinMSendjayaS, et al.Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. Leader Q2019; 30(1): 111–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.
40.
ChenZZhuJZhouM. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self-identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. J Appl Psychol2015; 100(2): 511–521. DOI: 10.1037/a0038036.
41.
GreenleafRK. Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatnes. New York, NY: Paulist Press, 1977.
42.
WangCHYenCDLiuGHW. How intellectual capital influences individual performance: a multi-level perspective. Comput Hum Behav2015; 51(B): 930–937. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.044.
43.
HuselidMABeckerBE. Bridging micro and macro domains: workforce differentiation and strategic human resource management. J Manag2011; 37(2): 421–428. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310373400.
44.
KamocheKMuellerF. Human resource management and the appropriation learning perspective. Hum Relat1998; 51(8): 1033–1060. DOI: 10.1177/001872679805100803.
45.
SnellSADeanJW. Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Acad Manag J1992; 35(3): 467–504. DOI: 10.2307/256484.
46.
LinCHVSandersKSunJMJ, et al.From customer oriented strategy to organizational financial performance: the role of human resource management and customer-linking capability. Br J Manag2016; 27(1): 21–37. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12142.
47.
SooCTianAWTeoSTT, et al.Intellectual capital–enhancing HR, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Hum Resour Manag2017; 56(3): 431–454. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21783.
48.
KangSCMorrisSSnellSA. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: extending the human resource architecture. Acad Manag Rev2007; 32: 236–256.
49.
LindgreenAdi BenedettoCABrodie Rj JaakkolaE, et al.How to develop great conceptual frameworks for business-to-business marketing. Ind Market Manag2021; 94: A2–A10. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.005.
50.
SaridakisGLaiYCooperCL. Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Hum Resour Manag Rev2017; 27(1): 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.005.
51.
WrightPMGardnerTMMoynihanLM, et al.Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: additional data and suggestions for future research. Person Psychol2001; 54: 875–901. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00487.x.
52.
GuestDE. Human resource management and industrial relations. J Manag Stud1987; 24(5): 503–521. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00460.x.
53.
RenzlB. Trust in management and knowledge sharing: the mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega2008; 36(2): 206–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.005.
54.
KangSCSnellSA. Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management. J Manag Stud2009; 46(1): 65–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x.
55.
HuangHJDastmalchianA. Implications of trust and distrust for organizations: role of customer orientation in a four-nation study. Person Rev2006; 35: 361–377.
56.
LepakDPSnellSA. Examining the human resource architecture: the relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. J Manag2002; 28(4): 517–543. DOI: 10.1177/014920630202800403.
57.
GuzzoRADicksonMW. Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annu Rev Psychol1996; 47: 307–338. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307.
58.
ShiptonHJWestMAParkesCL, et al.When promoting positive feelings pays: aggregate job satisfaction, work design features, and innovation in manufacturing organizations. Eur J Work Organ Psychol2006; 15(4): 404–430. DOI: 10.1080/13594320600908153.
59.
NowakAVallacherRZochowskiM, et al.Functional synchronization: the emergence of coordinated activity in human systems. Front Psychol2017; 8: 945. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00945.
60.
CarlzonJ. Putting the customer first: the key to service strategy. McKinsey Q1987; 2(3): 38–51. DOI: 10.12691/jbms-2-3-1.
61.
MowdayRTPorterLWSteersRM. Employee-organization: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982.
62.
PfefferJ. The human equation: building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
63.
EisenhardtKSullD. Strategy as simple rules. Harv Bus Rev2001; 79(1): 107–116.
64.
WaltonRE. From control to commitment in the workplace. Harv Bus Rev1985; 63(2): 76–84. DOI: 10.1016/0090-2616(86)90040-9.
65.
JiangKLepakDPHuJ, et al.How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Acad Manag J2012; 55(6): 1264–1294. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.0088.
66.
BowenDE. Schneider BA service climate synthesis and future research agenda. J Serv Res2014; 17(1): 5–22. DOI: 10.1177/1094670513491633.
67.
XuAJWangL. How and when servant leaders enable collective thriving: the role of team–member exchange and political climate. Br J Manag2019; 31(2): 274–288. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12358.
68.
McCune SteinAAiMY. The dynamic interaction between high-commitment HRM and servant leadership. Manag Res Rev2019; 42(10): 1169–1186. DOI: 10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0083.
69.
CarnevaleJBHatakI. Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: implications for human resource management. J Bus Res2020; 116: 183–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037.
