The current digital revolution, the fourth information revolution in history after the invention of writing, the book and printing, has serious potential to exacerbate the gulf between the North and the South. As has been observed in the USA, even within an affluent country, with inadequate policy interventions, information technology not only widens the digital divide but also deepens the racial ravine. The implications of the new information and communication technologies (ICTs) for science and scholarship and for development are examined. The maldistribution of access to ICTs - telephones, computers, networks, Internet, bandwidth and electronic journals - is bound to make it even more difficult for the developing countries to contribute to, and take advantage of, knowledge in the sciences. These countries will get further marginalised. As suggested by Bruce Alberts, President of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, knowledge dissemination structures need to be put in place which are not entirely based on commerce. Innovative models, such as the community access model of the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, which attempts to transform the otherwise divisive information technologies into allies in the equity movement, can make a difference to the life of the rural poor. The Swaminathan model emphasises delivering locale-specific knowledge that the people actually need and can use to improve their lot. The model follows a bottom-up approach, involving the user community as partners right from the beginning, emphasises knowledge delivery and uses technology - a hybrid wired and wireless network - only when it is necessary to achieve its major goal of knowledge delivery.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] A. Tennyson (Lord) , Ulysses [poem].
2.
[2] D. de Solla Price , Little Science, Big Science ( Columbia University Press, New York , 1963).
3.
[3] D. Bell , The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting ( Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK , 1976).
4.
[4] P. Drucker , The next information revolution , Forbes ASAP (24 August 1998) 47-58 .
5.
[5] National Science Foundation , Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 ( National Science Foundation, Washington, DC , 1998), p. xx.
6.
[6] S. Arunachalam , New Biology Research in Israel [unpublished results].
7.
[7] J. Davidson Frame , F. Narin and M.P. Carpenter , World distribution of science , Social Studies of Science7 (1997) 501-516 .
8.
[8] A.M. Cetto , Scientific Publications in the Developing World ( COSTED, Chennai , 1998).
9.
[9] United Nations Development Programme , Human Development Report 1997 ( Oxford University Press, New York , 1997). See Human Development Indicators, Table 15: Educational imbalances, p. 181.
10.
[10] R.K. Merton , On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript ( Free Press, New York , 1965).
11.
[11] It is not what you know - if there are biases in scientific publication editors must take the blame [Editorial] , New Scientist2106 (1976) 3 .
12.
[12] Bruce Alberts interviewed by Bradie Metheny of Washington Fax.
13.
[13] J. Groen , E. Smit and J. Eijswoogel (eds), The Discipline of Curiosity: Science in the World ( Elsevier, Amsterdam , 1990). See chapter on Seun Ogunseitan, pp. 19-25.
14.
[14] B. Alberts , Science and the World’s Future . [Presidential address, 136th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Washington, DC, 26 April 1999.]
15.
[15] United Nations Development Programme , Human Development Report 1998 ( Oxford University Press, New York , 1998). See Human Development Indicators, Tables 17 and 34, pp. 167 and 193.
16.
[16] D.L. Hoffman and T.P. Novac , Bridging the racial divide on the Internet , Science280 (17 April 1998) 390-391 .
17.
[17] National Telecommunications and Information Administration , Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide ( NTIA, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC , 1997).
18.
[18] National Telecommunications and Information Administration , Falling Through the Net III: Defining the Digital Divide ( NTIA, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC , 1999).
19.
[19] United Nations , World Telecommunications Development Report 1998 - Universal Access. Executive Summary ( International Telecommunication Union, Geneva , 1998), p. 3.
20.
[20] C.J. Hamelink , New Information and Communication Technologies, Social Development and Cultural Change (DP 86) ( United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva , 1997), p. 27.
21.
[21] R.A. Hedley , The Information Age: Apartheid, Cultural Imperialism, or Global Village? [Paper delivered at the 14th International Conference of the World Association for Case Method Research and Application, Madrid, 1997.]
22.
[22] Knowledge System for Sustainable Food Security. Available at: http://www.mssrf.org/information%20village/index.html
23.
See Current Science (10 August 1999) 341-353 .
24.
[24] S. Arunachalam , Blending the past with the modern: how ecotechnology can change society - an interview of Prof. M.S. Swaminathan , GATE3 July-Sept (1997) 32-36 .
25.
[25] Available at: http://www.indev.org
26.
[26] Available at: http://www.2b1.org
27.
[27] In the context of the EXPO 2000, the key theme of which was ‘Humankind - Nature - Technology’, the Volkswagen Foundation organised a series of eight symposia in Hanover, beginning at the end of 1998 until July 1999, which were designed to initiate an intensive dialogue on major issues like ‘Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Rights’, ‘At the Crossroads: The Future Role of Work in Our Lives and Societies’, ‘Ecology and Economy - How Can We Achieve Sustainable Development?’, ‘Climate Change and Its Consequences’, ‘Biotechnology and Bioethics’, ‘Information and Knowledge in the Age of Electronic Communication’, ‘Political Philosophy Today: Rethinking the Enlightenment’ and ‘Science and Technology on the Threshold of the 21st Century’.
28.
[28] OECD , Science and Technology Policy: Review and Outlook (1991).
