Reports the results of a survey of library and information science (LIS) staff in public libraries and the private sector on understanding of, and attitudes towards, freedom of information (FoI) legislation. The paper describes the background to UK FoI legislation and how the proposed UK legislation fits into the pattern of laws in other countries. The survey demonstrates that many LIS staff are unsure about the proposed law and many do not seem to be aware of the likely implications of the proposed law on their workload. There is also a lack of awareness of the increased career opportunities that FoI may bring to the profession. The paper concludes with some recommendations, both for the implementation of any law and for the profession regarding its response to the proposed law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] S. Ellis and C. Oppenheim , Legal issues for information professionals, Part IV: Attitudes to data protection amongst UK media librarians , Journal of Information Science19(2) (1993) 99-117 .
2.
[2] P. Birkinshaw , Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal ( Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London , 1988).
3.
[3] A. Arblaster , Democracy ( Open University Press, Milton Keynes , 1987).
4.
[4] R. Axtmann , Liberal Democracy into the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Integration and the Nation-State ( Manchester University Press, Manchester , 1996).
5.
[5] N. Moore , Rights and Responsibilities in an Information Society. Available at: http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/infosoc/98-/moor/default.htm
6.
[6] R.A. Chapman and M. Hunt (eds), Open Government: A Study of the Prospects of Open Government Within the Limitations of the British Political System ( Croom Helm, London , 1987).
7.
[7] D.R. Rowat (ed.), Administrative Secrecy in Developed Countries ( Columbia University Press, New York , 1979).
8.
[8] B. Turfan , K. Ladizesky and I.A. Smith (eds), Emerging Democracies and Freedom of Information ( Library Association Publishing, London , 1995).
9.
[9] House of Commons Select Committee on Public Administration , Your Right to Know: The Government’s Proposals for a Freedom of Information Act . Third Report, Volume One. Report and Proceedings of the Committee together with Minutes of Evidence (The Stationery Office, London, 1998).
10.
[10] European Commission , Access to Commission Documents: A Citizen’s Guide ( Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg , 1997).
11.
[11] I. Smith , personal communication , on the conference on ‘The Archives of Repressive Regimes in an Open Society’, 4 and 5 June 1998, Riga, Latvia.
12.
[12] R. Hazell , Freedom of information in Australia, Canada and New Zealand , Public Administration67 (Summer 1989) 194 .
13.
[13] Your Right to Know: The United Kingdom Government’s Proposals for a Freedom of Information Act (Cm 3818) ( The Stationery Office, London , 1997).
14.
[14] E.D. Tate , Access to information: the Canadian experience , Journal of Information Science24(2) (1998) 75-82 .
15.
[15] Ministry of Justice, Sweden , Public Access to Information held by Swedish Authorities ( The Ministry of Justice, Stockholm , 1996).
16.
[16] D.C. Rowat , The French law on access to government documents , Government Publications Review10 (1983) 38 .
17.
[17] M. Jaus , Freedom of information comes to the European Union , Public Law (1996) 34 .
18.
[18] J. Carvel , Now read all about it , The Guardian (20 October 1995) 17 .
19.
[19] D. Vincent , The origins of public secrecy in Britain , Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (1991) 229-248 .
20.
[20] D. Northmore , Freedom of Information Handbook ( Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd, London , 1990).
21.
[21] Data Protection Act 1984 (c. 35) (The Stationery Office, London, 1984).
22.
[22] Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29) (The Stationery Office, London, 1998).
23.
[23] Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 (c. 43) (HMSO, London, 1985).
24.
[24] J. Steele , Public Access to Information: An Evaluation of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 ( PSI, London , 1995).
25.
[25] Open Government: Code of Practice on Access to Government Information, A Citizen’s Charter2nd ed. ( The Stationery Office, London , 1997).
26.
[26] R. Hazell , Freedom of information: the implications for the Ombudsman , Public Administration73 (Summer 1995) 265-270 .
27.
[27] ‘Code of Practice on Access to Government Information: 1997 Report published today’ 11 June 1998. (Unpublished press release through e-mail.)
28.
[28] R. Snell and H. Sheridan , Critique of the Recent UK White Paper: Your Right To Know. Available at: http://www/comlaw.utas.edu.au/law/foi/uk/white%20paper%20UK
29.
[29] P. Birkinshaw , An all singin’ and dancin’ affair: the new Labour government’s proposals for freedom of information , Public Law (Summer 1998) 180-186 .
30.
[30] J.B. Nordin (ed.), Who’s Who in the UK Information World 19976th ed. ( TFPL Publishing, London , 1996).
31.
[31] European Commission , Green Paper on Access to Government Information (1998). Available at: http://www2.echo.lu/info2000/en/publicsector/greenpaper.html
32.
[32] Campaign for Freedom of Information , Macpherson’s Challenge to Police Secrecy Proposals Welcomed (Press release, 25 February 1999).
