This study assesses attitudes towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in five faculties. Consideration is given to both users and non-users, examining why they use or do not use this medium. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of electronic publication are also examined.
The results suggest that, although the actual number of academics using electronic journals at present may be low, academics are willing to try this new medium. There are more users among academics in the Science and Engineering faculties than in the Arts or Business, while the results from the Law Department, where some staff are involved in an electronic journal project, indicate how influential the atmosphere within a department can be on the level of usage. The principal limiting factor is that of time to find electronic journals: academics initially simply need time to come to terms with the new technology and to locate electronic resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] T.M. Harrison and T.D. Stephen , The electronic journal as the heart of an online scholarly community , Library Trends43(4) (1995) 592-608 .
2.
[2] D. Schauder , Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry , Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(2) (1994) 73-100 .
3.
[3] S. Hitchcock , L. Carr and W. Hall , A Survey of STM Online Journals 1990-95: The Calm Before the Storm (1996). Available at: http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/survey/survey.html
4.
[4] K. Rustad , Electronic Journals in the National Library (1994). Available at: http://rosa.nbr.no/etids/e-tids.html
5.
[5] H.J. Butler , Research into the reward system of scholarship: where does scholarly electronic publishing get you? In: Filling the Pipeline and Paying the Piper: Scholarly Publishing on the Electronic Networks: Proceedings from the Fourth Symposium, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, 5-7 November 1994, edited by A. Okerson (Association of Research Libraries, Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing, Washington, DC, 1995), pp. 167-177 .
6.
[6] L. Baird and P.F. Burton , The Use and Potential of Electronic Journals in Scottish Libraries (Unpublished report to Scottish Library and Information Council , 1994), pp. 3-4.
7.
[7] Quoted in H. Roes , Electronic journals: a survey of the literature and the Net , Journal of Information Networking2(3) (1995) 169-186 .
8.
[8] A. Okerson , The electronic journal: what, whence, and when?The Public-Access Computer Systems Review2(1) (1991). Available at: gopher://info.lib.uh.edu:70/00/articles/e-journals/uhlibrary/pacsreview/v2/n1/okerson.2n1
9.
[9] Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists7th ed. ( Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC , 1998). Available at: http://arl.cni.org/scomm/edir/
10.
[10] J. Luther , Full Text Journal Subscriptions: An Evolutionary Process (1998). Available at: http://www.arl.org:591/luther.html
11.
Also in A. Okerson and J. O’Donnell (eds), Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing ( Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC , 1995).
12.
[12] T. Wilson , ‘In the beginning was the word...’: social and economic factors in scholarly electronic communication , Aslib Proceedings47(9) (1995) 195-202 .
13.
[13] J. Olsen , Electronic Journal Literature: Implications for Scholars ( Mecklermedia, London , 1994), pp. 33-34.
14.
[14] A.M. Odlyzko , Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals , Notices of the American Mathematical Society42(1) (1995) 49-53 .
15.
[15] R. Peek and G.B. Newby (eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , 1996).
