The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: a citation analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 1998
The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: a citation analysis
The Internet-based electronic resources (e-sources) are growing dramatically; however, there have not been empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. This study tries to investigate how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of library and information science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. Four citation-based indicators are proposed and used in this study for the impact measurement.
Compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of the impact across the years. It is found that journal format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, i.e. electronic journal (e-journal) articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print journal (p-journal) articles. However, once authors cite e-sources, there is no significant difference in the number of e-references per article by journal format or by year. This finding suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the journal format in which the authors choose to publish.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] Association of Research Libraries , Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1991).
2.
[2] M. Strangelove , D. Kovacs and A. Okerson (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists2nd ed. ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1992).
3.
[3] M. Strangelove , D. Kovacs and A. Okerson (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists3rd ed ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1993).
4.
[4] L.A. King , D. Kovacs and A. Okerson (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists4th ed ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1994).
5.
[5] L.A. King , D. Kovacs and A. Okerson (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists5th ed ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1995).
6.
[6] D. Mogge and D.K. Kovacs (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists6th ed ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1996).
7.
[7] A. Okerson , Introduction. In: D. Mogge and D.K. Kovacs (eds), Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists6th ed ( ARL, Washington, DC , 1996).
8.
[8] C.L. Borgman , Editor’s introduction. In: C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics ( Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
9.
[9] F.W. Lancaster and L.C. Smith , Science, scholarship and the communication of knowledge , Library Trends27(3) (1979) 367-388 .
10.
[10] W.D. Garvey , N. Lin and C.E. Nelson , Communication in the physical and social sciences. In: W.D. Garvey (ed.), Communication: The Essence of Science ( Pergamon Press, New York , 1979).
11.
[11] Scholarly Communication: The Report of the National Enquiry ( Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD , 1979).
12.
[12] A.J. Meadows , Communication in Science ( Butterworths, London , 1974).
13.
[13] W.D. Garvey (ed.), Communication: The Essence of Science ( Pergamon Press, New York , 1979).
14.
[14] D.W. King , D.D. McDonald and N.K. Roderer (eds), Scientific Journals in the United States: Their Production, Use, and Economics ( Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA , 1981).
15.
[15] K. Subramanyam , Scientific and Technical Information Resources ( Marcel Dekker, New York , 1981).
16.
[16] C.B. Osburn , The structuring of the scholarly communication system , College and Research Libraries50(3) (1989) 277-286 .
17.
[17] K.W. McCain , Mapping authors in intellectual space: population genetics in the 1980s. In: C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics ( Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
18.
[18] M.W. Lockett and Y.J. Khawam , Referencing patterns in C&RL and JAL, 1984-1986: a bibliometric analysis , Library and Information Science Research12(3) (1990) 281-289 .
19.
[19] W.D. Garvey , N. Lin , C.E. Nelson and K. Tomita , Research studies in patterns of scientific communication: II, The role of the national meeting in scientific and technical communication. In: W.D. Garvey (ed.), Communication: The Essence of Science ( Pergamon Press, New York , 1979).
20.
[20] T. Duncan , Implementation of electronic information systems in universities and the implications for change in scholarly research . In: A. Hirshon (ed.), After The Electronic Revolution, Will You Be The First To Go? Proceedings of the 1992 Association for Library Collections and Technical Services President’s Program, San Francisco, CA, 29 June 1992 (American Library Association, Chicago, 1993).
21.
[21] W. Crawford , Creativity and Connectedness: Results. A message posted to PACS-L on 13 October 1992, available at: http://listserv.uh.edu/archives/pacs-l.html
22.
[22] J. Cohen , Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty , Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy6(2/3) (1996) 41-63 .
23.
[23] B. Cronin and G. McKim , Science and scholarship on the World Wide Web: a North American perspective , Journal of Documentation52(2) (1996) 163-171 .
24.
[24] A.C. Schaffner , The future of scientific journals: lessons from the past , Information Technology and Libraries13(4) (1994) 239-247 .
25.
[25] M.P. Collins and Z.L. Berge , IPCT Journal: a case study of an electronic journal on the Internet , Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(10) (1994) 771-776 .
26.
[26] C.A. Jenda , Electronic journal publishing and the scientific scholarly communication system . In: M.E. Williams (ed.), National Online Meeting 1994: Proceedings of the 15th National Online Meeting, New York, 10-12 May 1994 (Learned Information, Medford, NJ, 1994).
27.
[27] R. Kling and L. Covi , Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication , The Information Society11(4) (1995) 261-271 .
28.
[28] F.W. Lancaster , The evolution of electronic publishing , Library Trends43(4) (1995) 518-527 .
29.
[29] C.W. Bailey Jr , The Coalition for Networked Information’s acquisition-on-demand model: an exploration and critique , Serials Review18(1/2) (1992) 78-81 .
30.
[30] M.E. Stoller , Electronic journals in the humanities: a survey and critique , Library Trends40(4) (1992) 647-666 .
31.
[31] M.J. Kovacs and D.K. Kovacs , The state of scholarly electronic conferencing , Electronic Networking: Research, Applications and Policy1(2) (1991) 29-36 .
32.
[32] D.K. Kovacs , K.L. Robinson and J. Dixon , Scholarly e-conference on the academic networks: how library and information science professionals use them , Journal of the American Society for Information Science46(4) (1995) 244-253 .
33.
[33] A. Okerson , The electronic journal: what, whence, and when?The Public-Access Computer Systems Review2(1) (1991). Available at: http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v2/n1/okerson.2n1
34.
[34] S.P. Harter , The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communication: a citation analysis , The Public-Access Computer Systems Review7(5) (1996). Available at: http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v7/n5/hart7n5.html
35.
[35] S.P. Harter and H.J. Kim , Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study . In: J.M. Griffiths , C.A. Hert and G. Whitney (eds), The Digital Revolution Proceedings of the ASIS 1996 Mid-Year Meeting, San Diego, California, 18-22 May 1996 (Information Today, Medford, NJ, 1996). Also available at: http://ezinfo.ucs.indiana.edu/%7Eharter/harter-asis96midyear.html
36.
[36] Y. Tonta , Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources , IFLA Journal22(3) (1996) 240-245 .
37.
[37] S. Hitchcock , L. Carr and W. Hall , A Survey of STM Online Journals 1990-95: The Calm Before the Storm. Available at: http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/survey/survey.html
38.
[38] Committee on the Conduct of Science, National Academy of Sciences , On Being a Scientist ( National Academy Press, Washington, DC , 1989).
39.
[39] L.A. Lievrouw , Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In: C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics ( Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
40.
[40] E. Garfield , Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities ( Wiley, New York , 1979).
[42] B. Cronin , The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citation in Scientific Communication ( Taylor Graham, London , 1984).
43.
[43] H.D. White and K.W. McCain , Bibliometrics. In: M.E. Williams (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology24 ( Learned Information, Medford, NJ , 1989).
44.
[44] M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts , Problems of citation analysis: a critical review , Journal of the American Society for Information Science40(5) (1989) 342-349 .
45.
[45] C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics ( Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
46.
[46] M.X. Liu , Progress in documentation: the complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies , Journal of Documentation49(4) (1993) 370-408 .
47.
[47] G. Fletcher and A. Greenhill , Academic referencing of Internet-based resources , Aslib Proceedings47(11/12) (1995) 245-252 .
48.
[48] X. Li and N.B. Crane , Electronic Style - A Guide to Citing Electronic Information ( Meckler, London , 1993).
49.
[49] X. Li and N.B Crane , Electronic Style - A Handbook for Citing Electronic Information ( Information Today, Medford, NJ , 1996).
50.
[50] J.R. Walker , MLA-Style Citations of Electronic Sources, 1995 (Rev. 11/97). Available at: http://www.cas.usf.edu/english/walker/mla.html
51.
[51] E. Davenport , Information science observed: new media and productivity in a group of UK practitioners , Journal of Documentation50(4) (1994) 291-315 .
52.
[52] D. Schauder , Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry , Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(2) (1994) 73-100 .
53.
[53] B. Cronin and K. Overfelt , E-journals and tenure , Journal of the American Society for Information Science46(9) (1995) 700-703 .
54.
[54] S.P. Harter and H.J. Kim , Accessing electronic journals and other e-publications: an empirical study , College and Research Libraries57(5) (1996) 440-456 .
55.
(Reprinted from Chronicle of Higher-Education, 18 October, 1989, A56 .)
56.
[56] R.P. Peek , Scholarly publishing, facing the new frontiers. In: R.P. Peek and G.B. Newby (eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier ( MIT, Cambridge, MA , 1996).
57.
[57] A.M. Odlyzko , Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. In: R.P. Peek and G.B. Newby (eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier ( MIT, Cambridge, MA , 1996).
