The paper continues an analysis of the field of information policy as a field of scholarship. The first part of the analysis was reported in an earlier paper and was linked to the call of Ian Rowlands for ‘value-critical and paradigm-critical’ approaches in information policy. The paper begins by comparing research in information policy with the output of the field of policy studies. It concludes that there are substantial gaps in the range of information policy research relative to the scope of policy studies. The gaps are located in areas where value-and paradigm-critical approaches could have most impact in taking the field of information policy to intellectual maturity. The implications of adopting value-and paradigm-critical approaches to scholarship are explored within the context of the new interpretative social sciences which are dominating much of contemporary scholarship. Some approaches and frameworks from the new methodologies which are seen as particularly relevant to information policy are described. A case is made for extending the range of research paradigms employed in information policy research in the interests of strengthening its currently inadequate intellectual foundations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
[1] M. Browne , The field of information policy: 1. Fundamental concepts , Journal of Information Science23(4) (1997) 261-275 .
2.
[2] I. Rowlands , Understanding information policy: concepts, frameworks and research tools , Journal of Information Science22(1) (1996) 13-25 .
3.
[3] R.H. Burger , Information Policy: A Framework for Evaluation and Policy Research ( Ablex, Norwood, NJ , 1993).
4.
[4] I. Rowlands and S. Vogel , Information Policies: A Sourcebook ( Taylor Graham, London , 1991).
5.
[5] M.W. Hill , National Information Policies and Strategies: An Overview and Bibliographic Survey ( Bowker-Saur, London , 1994).
6.
[6] W.C. Priest , Public Policy, Research, the NII and the Public Good: Public Issue, 6. [Unpublished manuscript, 1994.] Available on Internet: bmslib@mitva.mit.edu.
7.
[7] E.M. Trauth , An integrative approach to information policy research , Telecommunications Policy10(1) (1986) 41-50 .
8.
[8] W. Parsons , Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis ( Edward Elgar, Aldershot , 1995).
9.
[9] B.W. Hogwood and L.A. Gunn , Policy Analysis for the Real World ( Oxford University Press, Oxford , 1984).
10.
[10] H. Lasswell , The emerging conception of policy sciences , Policy Sciences1(1) (1970) 3-14 .
11.
[11] M. Carley , Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis ( Heinemann; Policy Studies Institute, London , 1988).
12.
[12] B. Mahon , European information policy: the shaping role of institutions. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy ( Bowker-Saur, London , 1997).
13.
[13] B. Jennings , Interpretative social science and policy analysis. In: D. Callahan and B. Jennings (eds), Ethics, the Social Sciences and Policy Analysis ( Plenum Press, New York , 1983).
14.
[14] M. Rein , Social Science and Public Policy ( Penguin, Harmondsworth , 1976).
15.
[15] Y.S. Lincoln and E.C. Guba , Naturalistic Inquiry ( Sage, Newbury Park, CA , 1985).
16.
[16] E.G. Guba , The alternative paradigm dialog. In: E.G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog ( Sage, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
17.
[17] J.D. Glazier and R.R. Powell , Qualitative Research in Information Management ( Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO , 1992).
18.
[18] N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research ( Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA , 1994).
19.
[19] B. Dervin , Information democracy: an examination of underlying assumptions , Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(6) (1994) 369-385 .
20.
[20] A.R. Sandstrom and P.E. Sandstrom , The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research , Library Quarterly65(2) (1995) 161-199 .
21.
[21] G.P. Radford , Positivism, Foucault and the fantasia of the library: conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience , Library Quarterly62(4) (1992) 408-424 .
22.
[22] B. Frohmann , Discourse analysis as a research method in library and information science , Library and Information Science Research16 (1994) 119-138 .
23.
[23] T.K. Park , Toward a theory of user-based relevance: a call for a new paradigm of inquiry , Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(3) (1994) 131-141 .
24.
[24] B. Hjørland and H. Albrechtsen , Toward a new horizon in information science: domain analysis , Journal of the American Society for Information Science46(6) (1995) 400-425 .
25.
[25] A.L. Dick , Library and information science as a social science: neutral and normative conceptions , Library Quarterly65(2) (1995) 216-235 .
26.
[26] D.A. Schon and M. Rein , Frame Reflection: Towards a Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies ( Basic Books, New York , 1994).
27.
[27] M. Rein , Value-critical policy analysis. In: D. Callahan and B. Jennings (eds), Ethics, the Social Sciences and Policy Analysis ( Plenum Press, New York , 1983).
28.
[28] Office of Government Information Technology , Management of Government Information as a National Strategic Resource ( Office of Government Information Technology, Canberra, ACT , 1996).
29.
[29] M. Browne , Organizational Decision Making and Information ( Ablex, Norwood, NJ , 1993).
30.
[30] E. Hyams , Coalition for public information , Inform186 (1996) 1, 3-4 .
31.
[31] National Information Infrastructure Advisory Council , Common Ground: Fundamental Principles for the National Information Infrastructure ( National Information Infrastructure Advisory Council, Washington, DC , 1995).
32.
[32] S. Braman , Horizons of the state: information policy and power , Journal of Communication45(4) (1995) 4-24 .
33.
[33] E.S. Overman and A.G. Cahill , Information policy: a study of values in the policy process , Policy Studies Review9(4) (1990) 803-818 .
34.
[34] F. Webster , Theories of the Information Society ( Routledge, London , 1995).
35.
[35] European Commission . Living and Working in the Information Society: People First (Green Paper) ( EU, Brussels , 1996).
36.
[36] J.F. Georgeet al. , The information society: image versus reality in national computer plans , Information Infrastructure and Policy4(3) (1995) 181-192 .
37.
[37] N. Moore , Neo-liberal or dirigiste? Policies for an information society. In: I. Rowlands (ed.), Understanding Information Policy ( Bowker-Saur, London , 1997).
38.
[38] Information Highway Advisory Council , Moving Canada to the 21st Century ( IHAC, Ottawa, Ontario , 1996).
39.
[39] Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations to The European Council (Bangemann Report) ( European Council, Brussels , 1994).
40.
[40] Y.S. Lincoln , The making of a constructivist. In: E.G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog ( Sage, Newbury Park, CA , 1990).
41.
[41] E.G. Guba , The effect of definitions of policy on the nature and outcomes of policy analysis , Educational Leadership42(2) (1984) 63-72 .
