Information transfer and cognitive mismatch: a Popperian model for studies of public understanding

Abstract

Studies of public understanding, which include specific areas of study such as the public understanding of science, intuitive physics, nutritional myths and misunderstandings, and the ‘mental mapping’ of geographical space are seen as falling into a general model of information transfer, using Popper’s notion of three Worlds. The deficiencies and distortions of understanding that these studies reveal can be perceived as defects in information transfer from Worlds 1 and 3 to World 2. It is proposed that more detailed cognitive profiling could identify these problem areas, thus enabling remedial measures to be taken to ensure better information transfer to the public for specific ventures, such as the promotion of healthcare, education or advertising.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] L. Wolpert , The Unnatural Nature of Science ( Faber and Faber, London , 1992).

[2] S. Moscovici , The phenomena of social representations. In: R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (ed.), Social Representation ( Cambridge University Press , 1984).

[3] R.M. Farr , Common sense, science and social representations , Public Understanding of Science 2(3) (1993) 189-204 .

[4] J.R. Durant , G.A. Evans and G.P. Thomas , The public understanding of science , Nature 340 (1989) 11-14 .

[5] C. Holden , Science: what the public thinks , Science 264 (1994) 902 .

[6] Scientific understanding: dumb and dumber? Chemistry and Industry (1 May 1995) 328 .

[7] Z. Zhang and J. Zhang , A survey of public scientific literacy in China , Public Understanding of Science 2(1) (1993) 21-38 .

[8] J. Ziman , Public understanding of science , Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (1991) 99-105 .

[9] R. Driver , Everyday science: is it right or does it work? British Journal of Developmental Psychology 8 (1990) 295-297 .

10.

[10] J.M. Lévy-Leblond , About misunderstandings about misunderstandings , Public Understanding of Science 1(1) (1992) 17-21 .

11.

[11] K.R. Popper , Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach ( Clarendon Press, Oxford , 1972).

12.

[12] B.C. Brookes , The foundations of information science. Part 1. Philosophical aspects , Journal of Information Science 2(3,4) (1980) 125-133 .

13.

[13] M. Piattelli-Palmarini , Inevitable Illusions: How Mistakes of Reason rule our Minds ( Wiley, New York , 1994).

14.

[14] M. McCloskey , Intuitive physics , Scientific American 248 (April 1983) 114 .

15.

[15] D. Twigger et al. , The conception of force and motion of students aged between 10 and 15 years: an interview study designed to guide instruction , International Journal of Science Education 16(2) (1994) 215-229 .

16.

[16] R. Driver , J, Leach , R. Millar and P. Scott , Young People’s Images of Science ( Open University Press, Buckingham , 1996).

17.

[17] A. Caramazza , M. McCloskey and B. Green , Naive beliefs in ‘sophisticated’ subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , Cognition 9 (1981) 117-123 .

18.

[18] R. Driver , Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science , European Journal of Science Education 3(1) (1981) 93-101 .

19.

[19] D. Ausubel , Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View ( Holt, Rinehart and Winston , 1968).

20.

[20] E. Engel Clough and R. Driver , A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts , Science Education 70(4) (1986) 473-496 .

21.

[21] H. Nowotny , Socially distributed knowledge: five spaces for science to meet the public , Public Understanding of Science 2(4) (1993) 307-319 .

22.

[22] J.C. Olson and L.S. Sims , Assessing nutrition knowledge from an information processing perspective , Journal of Nutrition Education 12 (1980) 157-161 .

23.

[23] R. Abbott, A Study of Nutritional Understanding and its Implications for Information Provision (MA Thesis) (University of Brighton, 1995).

24.

[24] S.D. Johnson and E.J. Hart , Nutrition misconceptions , Health Education 8(3) (1977) 36-38 .

25.

[25] H.E. Bauman , What does the consumer know about nutrition? Journal of the American Medical Association 225 (1973) 61-62 .

26.

[26] K. Lynch , The Image of the City ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , 1960).

27.

[27] R.M. Downs and D. Stea , Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping ( Harper and Row, New York , 1977).

28.

[28] P. Gould and R. White , Mental Maps ( Penguin Books, Harmondsworth , 1974).

29.

[29] D. Appleyard , Styles and methods of structuring a city , Environment and Behavior 2 (1970) 100-118 .

30.

[30] S. Shum , Real and virtual spaces: mapping from spatial cognition to hypertext , Hypermedia 2(2) (1990) 133-158 .

31.

[31] N.J. Belkin , Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval , Canadian Journal of Information Science 5 (1980) 133-143 .

32.

[32] D’Arcy Masius Benton and Bowles , The DMB&B Healthy Eating Study ( DMB&B, London , 1986).

33.

[33] R. Driver , Students’ conceptions and the learning of science , International Journal of Science Education 11 (1989) [Special Issue] 481-490 .