This paper considers the need for a more systematic and critical approach to the academic study of information policy at national and international level. It reviews the complex, multifaceted nature of large-scale information policy problems and considers some of the main sources of confusion in the journal literature. It is argued that while information policy has been largely technology-driven, the consideration of information policy issues has, for histor ical reasons, typically been discipline-bounded. This has contributed to a fragmentation of research effort and a lack of consensus on the most appropriate home discipline for the study of information policy. In the search for a more critical scientific understanding of information policy issues, a brief review is made of the strengths, limitations and applicability of the broad theoretical and methodolog ical approaches which have been adopted, often implicitly, by writers reporting in the library and information science literature. The paper concludes with a consideration of some desirable characteristics for the design of information policy studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
N. Garnham, What is multimedia? In: Legal Aspects of Multimedia and Geographical Information Systems: Proceedings of the European Commission's Legal Advisory Board Conference, Lisbon, 27-28 October1994 (CEC Legal Advisory Board, Luxembourg , 1994).
2.
Commission of the European Communities, Europe's Way to the Information Society: An Action Plan ( CEC, Brussels, 1994).
3.
D.T. Hawkins et al., Forces shaping the electronic publishing industry of the 1990s, Electronic Networking2(4) (1992) 38-60.
4.
F.W. Weingarten , Federal information policy development: the Congressional perspective. In: C. McClure , P. Hernon and H. Relyea (eds), United States Government Information Policies: Views and Perspectives (Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1989).
5.
P. Hernon and H.C. Relyea, Information policy. In: A. Kent and H. Lacour (eds), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Volume 48, Supplement II (Dekker, New York, 1968 -).
6.
I. Malley, National Information Policy in the United Kingdom ( IMPC , Shepshed, UK, 1988).
7.
J. Gray, National Information Policies: Problems and Progress ( Mansell, London, 1988).
8.
T.T. Suprenant , Problems and trends in international information and communication policies, Information Processing and Management23(1) ( 1987) 47-64.
9.
N. Moore, Information Policy: A Discussion Paper on the Scope of the Policy Studies Institute (Policy Studies Institute, London, 1992).
10.
T.J. Galvin , Rights in conflict: public policy in an information age. In: New Worlds in Information and Documentation: Proceedings of the 46th FID Conference and Congress1992 (FID, The Hague, 1994 ).
11.
R.H. Burger , Information Policy: A Framework for Evaluation and Policy Research (Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1993).
12.
Department of National Heritage, The Secretary of State's Speech to the Library Association Umbrella Conference on 9 July 1993 (DNH Press Office, London, 1993).
13.
J. Martyn , UK government policy on the electronic information industry, Journal of Information Science18(4) (1992) 269-272.
14.
J. Gray, National information policy: myth or magic? Alexandria1(3) ( 1989) 21-30.
15.
R. Gray, Towards a Framework for a National Information Policy: Discussion Paper for LISC(E)Meeting to be held at the Department of National Heritage on 4 November1993 ( Rosemary Gray Associates, London, 1993).
16.
N. Moore , Information policy and strategic development: a framework for the analysis of policy objectives, Aslib Proceedings45(11/12) (1993) 281-285.
17.
T.R. Dye, Understanding Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984).
18.
J.E. Anderson , Public Policymaking: An Introduction (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1990).
19.
D. Easton, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Wiley, New York, 1965).
20.
E. Latham, The Group Basis of Politics (Octagon Books, New York, 1965).
21.
T.R. Dye and L.H. Ziegler, The Irony of Democracy (Brookes/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1990).
22.
A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper & Row , New York, 1957).
23.
S. Braman , Defining information: an approach for policymakers , Telecommunications Policy13(3) (1989) 233-242.
24.
E.M. Trauth , An integrative approach to information policy research, Telecommunications Policy10(1) (1986) 41-50.
25.
J.R. Bennett , Control of Information in the United States: An Annotated Bibliography (Meckler, Westport, CT, 1987).
26.
E. Julien, D. Robinson and J. Tinline, Bibliography for the National Summit on Information Policy ( National Library of Canada, Ottawa, 1992).
27.
T.C. Dahlin , Books and Documents on Government Information Policy: A Selected Bibliography (Vance Bibliographies , Monticello , 1990).
28.
R.L. Chartrand , Legislating information policy, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science12(5) (1986) 10.
29.
S. Milevski , Information policy through public laws of the 95th-98th Congresses, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting 23 (1986) 211-219.
30.
M.W. Hill, National Information Policies and Strategies: An Overview and Bibliographic Survey (Bowker-Saur, London, 1994).
31.
I. Rowlands and S. Vogel, Information Policies: A Sourcebook (Taylor Graham, London, 1991).
32.
US Domestic Council, Committee on the Right to Privacy, National Information Policy - the 'Rockefeller Report' (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1976).
33.
R.H. Burger , The Evaluation of Information Policy: A Case Study Using the SATCOM Report (PhD Thesis) (University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign, 1988).
34.
US National Academy of Sciences SATCOM Committee , Scientific and Technical Communication: A Pressing National Problem and Recommendations for its Solution (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1969).
35.
J.A.A. Sillince , Coherence of issues and coordination of instruments in European information policy, Journal of Information Science20(4) ( 1994) 219-236.
36.
N. Moore and J. Steele, Information-intensive Britain: A Critical Analysis of the Policy Issues (Policy Studies Institute, London , 1991).
37.
T.J. McIntosh , Federal Information in the Electronic Age: Policy Issues for the 1990s (Bureau of National Affairs , Washington, DC, 1990).
38.
I. Rowlands , Toward public-private synergy in the European electronic information services market, Journal of Government Information22(3) (1995) 227-235.
39.
Commission of the European Communities, Europe's Way to the Information Society: An Action Plan ( CEC, Brussels, 1994).
40.
A.A. Bushkin and J.H. Yurow, The foundations of United States information policy. In: Proceedings of the , High Level Conference on Information, Computer and Communications Policies for the 80s, Paris, 6-8 October 1980, edited by H.P. Grassmann ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
41.
S. Braman, Information Policy and the United States Supreme Court (PhD Thesis) (University of Minnesota, 1988).
42.
H. Burkert, The legal framework of public sector information: recent legal policy developments in the EC, Government Publications Review19(5) (1992) 483-496.
43.
M. Porat, The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement ( Office of Telecommunications, Washington, DC, 1977).
44.
S.M. Greenstein , Invisible hands and visible advisors: an economic interpretation of standardization, journal of the American Society for Information Science43(8) (1992) 538-549.
45.
B.J. Bates , Information systems and society: potential impacts of alternative structures, Telecommunications Policy14(2) ( 1990) 151-158.
46.
C. Bezold and R. Olson, The Information Millenium: Alternative Futures: A Report for the Information Industry Association (Information Industry Association , Washington, DC, 1986).
47.
M.C.J. Elton , Forecasting the demand for new broadband services . In: M.C.J. Elton (ed.), Integrated Broadband Networks: The Public Policy Issues ( Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1991 ) pp. 53-66.
48.
J. Martyn, P. Vickers and M. Feeney (eds), UK Information 2000 (British Library/Bowker-Saur, London , 1990).
49.
S.B. Kiesler and P. Hinds, Technology, information and social behaviour. In: The Knowledge Economy: The Nature of Information in the 21st Century: Annual Review of the Institute for Information Studies 1993-94 ( Institute for Information Studies, Nashville, TN, 1993) pp. 117-135.
50.
M.E. Burke, Introduction to scenario forecasting. In: Proceedings of the European Business Information Conference1994, Paris, 23-25 March 1994 (TFPL, London, 1994) pp. 225-231.
51.
B.W. Hogwood and L.A. Gunn, Policy Analysis for the Real World (Oxford University Press, Oxford , 1984).
52.
R. Karni , A methodological framework for formulating information policy, Information and Management6(5) (1983) 269-280.
53.
S.S Dawes , A Theory of Interagency Information Sharing: Policy Coordination (PhD Thesis) (State University of NewYork at Albany, 1991).
54.
R.E. Jacobson , An 'Open' Approach to Information Policy Making: A Case Study of the Moore Universal Telephone Act (Ablex , Norwood, NJ, 1989).
55.
R.K. Stewart , Access and Efficiency in the Reagan-era Information Policy: A Case Study of the Attempt to Privatize the National Technical Information Service (PhD Thesis) (University of Washington, 1990).
56.
T.C. Bearman , Uses of scientific, technical and societal information by policy makers, Knowledge in Society1(1) (1988) 27-53.
57.
K.R. Hammond et al., The use of scientific information in public policy making, Technological Forecasting and Social Change24(4) (1983) 287-297.
58.
B.M. Compaigne , Evolving technology and blurring boundaries: new perspectives for evaluating media competition. In: B.M. Compaigne (ed.), Issues in New Information Technology (Ablex, Norwood, NJ , 1988).
