M. Borrus, Macroeconomic perspectives on the use of mtellectual property rights in Japan's economic performance. In: F. Rushing and C Ganz Brown, eds Scietice and Technology and Economic Performances (Westview Press, Boulder. San Francisco and London, 1990) 261-275.
4.
Office of Technology Assessment.Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Electronics and Information (Washington, DC.1986) 228.
5.
P. Samuelson .Benson revisited The case against patent protection for algorithms and other computer program-related innovations, Emow Law Journal39 (1990) 1025
6.
Annual Report.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD /TDR/1 ( 1991).
7.
See Annual Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UN 1991).
8.
A. Moody, New international environment for intellectual property rights. In: F. Rushing and Ganz Brown , eds. op. cit. C. Correa. Propriedad intelectual, innot acion techologica v Comercio evterior, vol. 39, No 2. Mexico (December 1990); C.A. Primo Braga.The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT a view from the South, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law22 (1989) 243 et seq., P. Almeida, The "new" intellectual property regime and its economic impact on developing countries In G. Sacerdoti, ed., Liberalization of Services and Intellectual Property in the Uruguav Round of GA TT (University Press, Fnbourg , 1990)
9.
R. Evenson, Intellectual property rights In R and D inventions, technology purchase and piracy in economie development an international comparative study In. R Evanson and G. Rains, eds., Science and Technology Lessons for Development Policy (Westview Press. Boulder ) 235
10.
S. Page, M. Davenport and A. Hewitt, The GATT Uruguay Round effects on developing countries ( Overseas Development Institute. London. 1991)
