Comparison of 39 full texts of articles in the ONTAP Com puter database with their abstracts showed (1) no significant relationship between abstract length and full-text length, (2) a small, but significant, tendency for abstract words and phrases to concentrate at the beginning of the full text, (3) little use in abstracts of longer verbatim word sequences from full texts. Additional results using the RightWriter style checker are also reported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American National Standards Institute, American National Standard for Writing Abstracts (ANSI , New York, 1979).
2.
C.L. Bernier , Abstracts and abstracting. In: A. Kent and H. Lancour (Editors), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 1 (Dekker , New York, 1968) 16-38.
3.
S. Bonzi and E.D. Liddy, Testing the assumption underlying use of anaphora in natural language tests [sic], Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting25 (1988) 23-30.
4.
H. Borko and C.L. Bernier, Abstracting Concepts and Methods (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
5.
H. Borko and S. Chatman.Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstracters' instructions, American Documentation14 (2) (1963) 149-160.
6.
G.J. Caras , Indexing from abstracts of documents, Journal of Chemical Documentation8 (1) (1968) 20-22.
7.
D.B. Cleveland and A.D. Cleveland, Introduction to Abstracting and Indexing (Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, CO, 1983).
8.
T.C. Craven .Sentence dependency structures in abstracts , Library and Information Science Research10 (4) (1988) 401-410.
9.
T.C. Craven , Text network display editing with special reference to the production of customized abstracts, Canadian Journal of Information Science13 (1/2) (1988) 59-68.
T.C. Craven , Customized extracts based on Boolean queries and sentence dependency structures, International classification16 (1) (1989) 11-14.
12.
T.C. Craven, An interactive aid for coding of sentence dependency structures, Canadian Journal of Information Science14 (3) (1989) 32-41.
13.
E.T. Cremmins , The Art of Abstracting ( ISI Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1982 ).
14.
Decisionware, RightWriter intelligent grammar and style checker, version 2.0 (Decisionware, Sarasota, FL, 1986).
15.
G.B. Dronberger and G.T. Kowitz, Abstract readability as a factor in information systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science26 (2) (1975) 108-111.
16.
B. Endres-Niggemeyer , Referierregeln und Referate—Ab— stracting als regelsgesteuerter Textverarbeitungsprozess, Nachrichten fiir Dokumentation36 (1) (1985) 38-50.
17.
R. Fidel , Writing abstracts for free-text searching, Journal of Documentation42 (1) (1986) 11-21.
18.
B. Harris and T.R. Hofmann, FABS (formulated abstracting): an experiment in regularized content description, Open Conference on Information Science in Canada Proceedings1 (1973) 17-27.
19.
K. Hirayama , Length of an abstract and amount of information , Journal of Chemical Documentation4 (1) (1964) 9-11.
20.
L.P. Jones , E.W. Gassie and S. Radhakrishnan, INDEX: the statistical basis for an automatic conceptual phrase-indexing system, Journal of the American Society for Information Science41 (2) (1990) 87-97.
21.
R. King, A comparison of the readability of abstracts with their source documents , Journal of the American Society for Information Science27 (2) (1976) 118-121.
22.
M. Lebowitz , The use of memory in text processing, Communications of the ACM31 (12) (1988) 1483-1502.
23.
E.D. Liddy , Discourse-level structure in abstracts, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science24 (1987) 138-147.
24.
E.D. Liddy , Structure of information in full-text abstracts , RIAO88 (1988) 183-195.
25.
E. Liddy , S. Bonzi, J. Katzer and E. Oddy, A study of discourse anaphora in scientific abstracts, Journal of the American Society for Information Science38 (4) (1987) 255-261.
26.
T. Maeda , An approach toward functional text structure analysis of scientific and technical documents, Information Processing and Management17 ( 1981) 329-339.
27.
R.E. Maizell , J.F. Smith and T.E.R. Singer, Abstracting Scientific and Technical Literature: an Introductory Guide and Text for Scientists, Abstractors, and Management (Krieger, Huntington, NY, 1979).
28.
A.H. Morris, Supporting Environmental Scanning and Organizational Communication with the Processing of Text: the Use of Computer-Generated Abstracts ( UMI, 1988).
29.
C. Paice , Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects, Information Processing and Management26 (1) (1990) 171-186.
30.
E.S. Palais , Abstracting for reference librarians, The Reference Librarian22 ( 1988) 297-308.
31.
T.V. Radziewskaya , Texts of abstracts considered in a linguopragmatic aspect, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics20 (4) (1986) 55-63.
32.
J.B. Reed , The diversity of text-length amongst systems of scientific and technological abstracts, Journal of Documentation22 (2) (1966) 136-143.
33.
C. Schwartz , Content based text handling, Information Processing and Management26 (2) (1990) 219-226.
34.
H.R. Tibbo, Abstracts, online searching and the humanities : an analysis of the structure and content of abstracts of historical discourse. PhD dissertation (University of Maryland, 1989).
35.
Wash 'n Ware Products.FOG-FINDER, version 1.1 (Wash 'n Ware Products, Baton Rouge, LA, 1984).
