The retrieval of review articles in the biomedical area is examined, by a case study approach, using two test queries, relating to aspects of drug therapy, for a comparative evalua tion of six online databases. It is concluded that a variety of sources must be searched in combination for comprehensive retrieval, lack of indexing of the "review" concept being a major problem. Suggestions for improvement in retrieval of review literature are made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A.M. Woodward , The role of reviews in information transfer , Journal of the American Society for Information Science28 (1977) 175-180.
2.
E. Garfield , Proposal for a new profession—scientific reviewer, Current Contents14 (1977) 5-8.
3.
W. Runge, The role of reviews in science [in German]. Nachrichten für Dokumentation34 (1983) 72-78.
4.
D. Bawden , Information systems and the stimulation of creativity, Journal ofInformation Science12 (1986) 203-216.
5.
D. Bawden, User Oriented Evaluation of Information Systems and Services ( Gower, Aldershot, 1990 ).
6.
D. Bawden and A.M. Brock, Chemical toxicology searching: a collaborative evaluation, comparing information resources and searching techniques, Journal of Information Science5 ( 1982) 3-18.
7.
D. Bawden and A.M. Brock, Chemical toxicology searching; a comparative study of online databases, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science25 ( 1985) 31-35.
8.
A. Costigan , F.E. Wood and D. Bawden, Comparison of search techniques (printed and computerised) with specific reference to the RTECS databank, Journal ofInformation Science10 (1985) 79-86.
9.
J. King, Searching international databases: a comparative evaluation of their performance in toxicology (British Library. Library and Information Research Report No. 3, 1983).
10.
E.P. Weston and D.S. Lauderdale, How do we learn what a database includes? A case study of psychology dissertations, RQ28 (1988) 35-51.
11.
B. Snow and S.L. Ifshin, Online database coverage of forensic medicine, Online8 (1984) 37-43.
12.
C. Price and R.A. Burley, An evaluation of information sources for retrospective literature searching on occupational diseases. Journal of Information Science12 ( 1986) 257-265.
13.
P.K. Corbett and S.L. Ifshin, Online retrieval of environmental and occupational health literature: a comparative study, Medical Reference Services Quarterly2(3) (1983) 25-26.
14.
A.A. Brand and L.A. Kinzie, A comparison of online access to psychoanalytic literature, Database7 (1984) 54-63.
15.
J.A. Barber et al., Case studies of the indexing and retrieval of pharmacology papers, Information Processing and Management24 (1988) 141-150.
16.
D. Bawden and T.K. Devon, RINGDOC—the database of pharmaceutical literature, Database3(3) (1980) 29-39.
17.
R.E. Hoover , RINGDOC—the database for pharmaceutical manufacturers and researchers, Online Review5 (1981) 453-468.
18.
K.W. McCain , H.D. White and B.C. Griffith, Comparing retrieval performance in online databases, Information Processing and Management23 (1987) 539-553.
19.
C.J. Armstrong and J.A. Large (Editors), Manual of Online Search Stategies (Gower, Aldershot, 1988).
20.
D. Bawden, Citation indexes. In: C.J. Armstrong and J.A. Large (Editors) Munual of Online Search Strategies (Gower, Aldershot, 1988).
