Both size and rank approaches to data analysis have been used by bibliometricians since the early days of the field. This paper looks at the similarities and differences in the two approaches, in both empirical descriptions and mathematical models. The value of the rank approach within the framework of order statistics is emphasized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
B.C. Brookes .Comments on the scope of bibliometrics. In: L. Egghe and R. Rousseau (Editors), Informetrics 87/88. Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval (Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1988) 29-41.
2.
J.J. Hubert , Relations between the forms of Bradford's law , Journal of the American Society for Information Science29 (1978) 159-161.
3.
Y.S. Chen and F.F. Leimkuhler , A relationship between Lotka's law, Bradford's law, and Zipf's law, Journal of the American Society for Information Science37 (1986) 307-314.
4.
H. White and K. McCain.Bibliometrics. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (forthcoming).
5.
M.J. Nelson and J.M. Tague, Split size-rank models for the distribution of index terms, Journal of the American Society for Information Science36 (1985 ) 283-296.
Q.L. Burrell , Predictive aspects of some bibliometric processes . In: L. Egghe and R. Rousseau (Editors). Informetrics 87/88. Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval (Elsevier , Amsterdam, 1988) 43-64.
8.
A.J. Lotka , The frequency distribution of scientific productivity . Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences16 (1926) 317-323.
9.
S.C. Bradford .Sources of information on specific subjects , Engineering137 ( 1934) 85-86; reprinted in Journal of Information Science10 (1985) 176-180.
10.
G.K. Zipf.Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge. MA, 1949).
11.
B.C. Brookes .The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution, Journal of Documentation24 (1968) 247-265.
12.
F.F. Leimkuhler , The Bradford distribution, Journal of Documentation23 (1967 ) 197-207.
13.
H.S. Sichel , A bibliometric distribution which really works . Journal of the American Society for Information Science36 (1985) 314-321.
14.
J.M. Tague and P.T. Nicholls.The maximum value of a Zipf size variable: sampling properties and relationship to other parameters. Information Processing and Management23 (1987) 155-170.
15.
E.J. Gumbel , Statistics of Extremes ( Columbia University Press, New York. 1958).
16.
H.A. David .Order Statistics. 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981).
17.
W. Glanzel and A. Schubert.Theoretical and empirical studies of the tails of scientometric distributions. In: L. Egghe and R. Rousseau (Editors). Informetrics 87/88, Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval (Elsevier , Amsterdam, 1988) 75-84.
18.
A.I. Yablonsky , On fundamental regularities of the distrihution of scientific productivity. Scientometrics2 (1980) 3-34.
