In the typical library operating online public access cata logues (OPACs) the computer masks the librarian from the user resulting in an impaired librarian-user interaction, which in turn results in a great deal of user failure in information retrieval. This is because of the nature of computer intermedia tion which reduces both the librarian's responsibility to the user and user contact with the library.
The present OPACs are operated with practices which emanated from manual catalogues and are unsuitable for online services. The user is expected to access the database online, but communication with him is not emphasized.
The design and management of online public access cata logues should be influenced by the needs and abilities of the user and efforts should be made to maintain personal com munication channels between the user and the information specialist so as to engender more user-cordial information environments.
These conditions, practices and recommendations are elaborated in this paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
T.M. Altchison , Online and the database producer, Journal of Information Science9 ( 1984) 75-80.
2.
R. Arnheim , What do the eyes contribute? A VCommunication Review10 (1978) 10-12.
3.
A.A. Azubuike and J.S. Umoh, The concept, methods, and problems of maximum subject indexing for computerized information storage and retrieval systems (forthcoming) 1988.
4.
A.A. Azubuike , G.O. Ibekwe, J.I. Adeyomoye and S.M. Lawani, An investigation into the factors affecting the precision of automated title searches (forthcoming) 1988.
5.
C.L. Bernier , Ethics of knowing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science36 (3) (1985) 211-212.
6.
B. Butler , Online public access: the sleeping beast awakens , Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science10 (1983) 6-10.
7.
R. Capurro , Moral issues in information science. Journal ofInformation Science11 (3) (1985) 113-123.
8.
A.E. Cawkell , Acceptability of transmission errors in online systems. Online Review1 (1977) 318-320.
9.
P.A. Cochrane , Modern subject access in online age, American Libraries15 (2-7) (1984) 145-150.
10.
J. Dickson , An analysis of user errors in searching an online catalogue, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly4 (3) (1984) 19-38.
11.
B. Dyson , Data input standards and computerization at the University of Hull, Journal of Librarianship16 (4) (1984) 246-261.
12.
C.M. Goldstein and W.H. Ford, The user-cordial interface, Online Review2 (1978) 269-275.
13.
M.N. Gouke and S. Pease, Title searches in an online catalogue and card catalogue: a comparative study of success in two libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship8 (3) (1982) 137-143.
14.
K. Hammell and K. Goldberg, The evolution of an online union catalogue: impact of user feedback, Information Technology and Libraries4 (1985) 162-168.
15.
C.R. Hildreth .Online public access catalogues, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology20 (1985) 233-285.
16.
J. Hudson , Bibliographic record maintenance in the onhne environment, Information Technology and Libraries3 (1984) 388-393.
17.
E. Jussim , Not yet, Gatenberg. Library Journal108 (12) (1983) 1203-1206.
18.
A. Kent, The potential of on-line information systems, in: Allen Kent and Thomas J. Galvin, eds., The On-line Revolution in Libraries (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978) 3-24.
19.
S.M. Malinconico .Listening to the resistance, Library Journal108 (1983) 353-355.
20.
I. Markey , Thus spoke the OPAC user, Information Technology and Libraries (4) (1983 ) 381-387.
21.
J.R. Matthews and G.S. Lawrence, Further analysis of the CLR Online Catalog Project, Information Technology and Libraries3 (1984) 354-376.
22.
C. McAllister and A.S. McAllister, A case for conversational cataloguing . The Electronic Library1 (1983) 59-67.
23.
C.T. Meadow , Searching and computer programming: some behavioural similarities (or why end users will eventually take over the terminal). Online3 (1979) 49-52.
24.
New Encyclopaedia Britannica, Macropaedia, Vol. II (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago, 1974).
25.
B. Nielsen , Online bibliographic searching and the deprofessionalization of librarianship. Online Review4 (1980) 215-224.
26.
J.N. Olsgaard , Automation as a socio-organizational agent of change: an evaluative literature review, Information Technology and Libraries4 (1985) 19-28.
27.
D.I. Raitt, Aspects of searching via on-line systems using controlled and uncontrolled vocabularies, International Association of University Libraries (IA TUL), Proceedings, The Netherlands 12 (1980) 3-21.
28.
G. Salton, Automatic indexing; a summary, in: Information Management Research in Europe, Proceedings of the EURIM5 conference, Palais de CongresVersailles. France, May, 1982 (Aslib, London, 1982) 66-67.
29.
T.W. Shaughnessy .Redesigning library jobs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science29 (4) (1978) 187-190.
30.
L.C. Smith , Implications of artificial intelligence for end user use of online systems, Online Review4 (4) (1980) 383-391.
31.
L.C. Smith , Artificial intelligence applications in information systems, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology15 (1980) 67-105.
32.
L.C. Smith , Public access to library automation, Report of the 17th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, Graduate School of Library Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, April 20-23, 1980. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 6 (6) (1980) 28-30.
33.
D. Steinberg and P. Metz, User response to and knowledge about an online catalogue, College and Research Libraries45 (1) (1984 ) 66-70.
34.
T.D. Sterling , Humanizing computerized information system, Science190 (4220) (1975) 1168-1172.
35.
V. Stewart, Change: The challenge for Management ( McGraw-Hill, London, 1983) 82-85.
36.
I.L. Travis and R. Fidel, Subject analysis, in: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology17 (1982) 123-157.
37.
B.C. Vickery , Knowledge representation: a brief review. Journal of Documentation42 (1986 ) 145-159.
38.
P. Wasserman , Measunng performance in a special library: problems and prospects. Special Libraries49 (1958) 377-382.
39.
M. Williams , Online problems - research today, solutions tomorrow, Bulletin of American Society for Information Science3 (4) ( 1977) 14-16.
40.
M.E. Williams , Online retrieval-today and tomorrow. Online Review2 (1978) 353-366.
41.
T.D. Wilson , On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation37 (1) (1981) 3-15.
