The literature on the information needs and uses of social scientists and humanists tends to ignore the stage of research in which the scholar collects and organizes written informa tion, i.e., the period between locating information and using it. This article reviews literature on information storage in the humanities and social sciences and describes an exploratory study of the content and organization of personal files. In the study, thirty-six professors in a major private university were each interviewed twice during a five month period. During the interview sessions, the scholars were asked to describe the way in which they organize their files. In addition, certain measure ments were taken in their offices: the linear feet of books, journals and other printed material on shelves; the number of filing drawers maintained; and the number of stacks of printed material on surfaces within the office. The findings are de scribed and discussed in the light of previous research. Finally, the article identifies ways in which such research could be used to develop superior information products and services and a better understanding of the process of scholarship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
T.J. Allen, Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977).
2.
L. Bebout , D. Davis, Jr. and D. Oehlerts, User studies in the humanities: a survey and proposal, RQ15 (1) (1975) 40-44.
3.
J.D. Bernal , Preliminary analysis of pilot questionnaire on the use of scientific literature, The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, 1948, 589-637.
4.
K.J. Brough, Scholar's Workshop (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1953).
5.
J.E. Burchard , How humanists use a library, in: C.F.J. Overhage and R.J. Harman, eds., Intrex (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965).
6.
V. Bush, As we may think, Atlantic Monthly176 (1) (1945) 101-108.
7.
D.O. Case, Personal computers: their adoption and use in information work by professors, unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1984.
8.
D. Crane, Information needs and uses, in: C. Cuadra ed., Annual Review of Information Science and Technology , Vol. 6 (Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., Chicago, 1971) 3-40.
9.
D. Crane, Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972).
10.
S. Crawford , Information needs and uses, in: M. Williams, ed., Annual Rev. Inform. Sci. Techn. 13 (1978) 61-82.
11.
C.-C. Chen , How do scientists meet their information needs?Special Libraries65 (1974) 272-280.
12.
G. Ford, Progress in documentation: research in user behavior in university libraries , J. Document.29 (1) (1973) 85-106.
13.
W.D. Garvey, Communication: The Essence of Science (Pergamon Press, New York, 1979).
14.
W.D. Garvey and B.C. Griffith, Informal channels of communication in the behavioral sciences: their relevance in the structuring of formal or bibliographic communication, in: E.B. Montgomery, ed., The Foundations of Access to Knowledge (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, 1967).
15.
B. Glass and S.H. Norwood, How scientists actually learn of work important to them, Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1959).
16.
D.E. Haag , Barriers limiting the usefulness of published information in the research environment, Special Libraries75 (1984) 214-220.
17.
W. Hagstrom, The Scientific Community (Basic Books, New York, 1965).
18.
P. Hernon, Use of Government Publications by Social Scientists (Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, New Jersey, 1979).
19.
P.J. Hills, ed., Trends in Information Transfer (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1982).
20.
G.E. Jahoda , R.D. Hutchens and R.R. Galford, Characteristics and use of personal indexes maintained by scientists and engineers in one university, American Documentation17 (1966 ) 71-75.
21.
G.E. Jahoda, Information Storage and RetrievalSystems for Individual Researchers (Wiley-Interscience , New York, 1970).
22.
D.W. King, D.D. McDonald and N.K. Roderer, The Journal in Scientific Communication: The Roles of Authors, Publishers, Libraries, and Readers in a Vital System (National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1979 ).
23.
D.W. King, D.D. McDonald and N.K. Roderer, Statistical Indicators of Scientific and Technical Information Communication (1960-1980) (King Research, Rockville, MA, 1976).
24.
G. Lindsey, An analytical model for assessing the information orientation and behavior of scientists and engineers, unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1979.
25.
M.B. Line, Information requirements in the social sciences, in: Access to the Literature of the Social Sciences and Humanities ( Queens' College Press, Flushing, NY, 1974).
26.
F. Machlup and K. Leeson, Information through the Printed Word: The Dissemination of Scholarly, Scientific, and Intellectual Knowledge, Volume 2: Journals (Praeger , New York, 1978).
27.
T.W. Malone , How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems, ACM Trans. Office Inform. Syst. I (1) (1983) 25-32.
28.
J. Martyn , Information needs and uses, in: C. Cuadra, ed., Annual Rev. Inform. Sci. Techn.9 (1974) 3-23.
29.
H. Menzel, The flow of information among scientists: problems, opportunities, and research questions, Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research, New York, 1958.
30.
G.A. Miller , Psychology and information, American Documentation19 (1968 ) 286-289.
31.
S.E. Najarian , Organizational factors in human memory: implications for library organization and access systems, The Library Quarterly51 (3) ( 1981) 269-291.
32.
National Enquiry, Scholarly Communication: The Report of the National Enquiry (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1979).
33.
B. Orbach, Historians: information needs, information seeking and the research process, unpublished specialization paper, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
34.
R. Orr, The scientist as an information processor: a conceptual model illustrated with data on variables related to library utilization, in: C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock , eds., Communication Among Scientists and Engineers (D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA, 1970.
35.
E.B. Parker and W.J. Paisley, Research for psychologists at the interface of the scientist and his information system, American Psychologist21 (1966) 1061-1071.
36.
D.J.S. Price , Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience, in: C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock, eds., Communication Among Scientists and Engineers (Heath, Lexington, MA, 1970).
37.
D.J.S. Price, Little Science, Big Science ( Columbia University Press, New York, 1963).
38.
E. Pulgram, Sciences, humanities, and the place of linguistics, in: Donald Thackery, ed., Research: Definitions and Reflections (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1967).
39.
J.E. Rowley andC.M.D. Turner, The Dissemination of Information (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1978).
40.
B. Skelton , Scientists and social scientists as information users: a comparison of science user studies with the investigation into the information requirements of the social scientists, J. Librarianship5 (2) ( 1971) 138-156.
41.
M.E. Soper , Characteristics and use of personal collections , Library Quarterly46 (4) (1976) 397-415.
42.
P. Stenstrom and R. McBride, Serial use by social science faculty: a survey, College and Research Libraries40 (5) (1970) 426-431.
43.
V. Stibic, Professional Documentation for Professionals: Means and Methods ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).
44.
M.F. Stieg , The information of (sic) needs of historians , College and Research Libraries42 (6) (1981) 549-560.
45.
S.K. Stoan , Computer searching: a primer for the uninformed scholar, Academe16 ( 1982) 10-15.
46.
S. Stone , Humanities scholars: information needs and uses , J. Documentation38 (4) (1982) 292-313.
47.
D.J. Urquhart , Use of scientific periodicals, International Conference on Scientific Information (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1958) 277-290.
