B. Barnes and J. Law.Whatever should be done with indexical expressions ?, Theory and Society3 (1976) 223-237.
2.
M.J. Bates, Factors affecting subject catalog search success, J. Amer. Soc. Information Sci.28 (3) (1977) 161-169.
3.
D. Bloor, Popper's mystification of objective knowledge, Science Studies4 (1974) 65-76.
4.
A. Brannigan, The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries (C.U.P., Cambridge, 1981).
5.
J.M. Brittain, What are the distinctive characteristics of information science?, in: O. Harbo and L. Kajberg, Eds., Theory and Application of Information Research. Proc. 2nd International Research Forum on Information Science (Mansell, London, 1980) 34-47.
6.
B.C. Brookes , The foundations of information science: Part 1. Philosophical aspects, J. Information Sci.2(3,4) (1980) 125-133.
7.
H.M. Collins and T.J. Pinch, The construction of the paranormal: nothing unscientific is happening, in: R. Wallis, Ed., On the Margins of Science: The social construction of Rejected Knowledge (University of Keele, 1979 ) 237-269.
8.
R.G.A. Dolby , What can we usefully learn from the Velikovsky affair?, Social Studies of Science5 (1975) 165-175.
9.
D. Edge, Quantitative measures of communication in science: a cntical review, History of Science17 (1979) 102-134.
10.
P. Forman, Weimar culture, causality, and quantum theory, 1918-1927: adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment, in: Historical Studies in the Phvsical Sciences 3 (1971) 1-116.
11.
F. Franks, Polywater (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA., 1981 ).
12.
G.N. Gilbert , Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science7 (1977 ) 113-129.
13.
J.W. Grove , Popper 'demystified': the curious ideas of Bloor (and some others) about world 3. Philosophy of the Social Sciences10 (1980) 173-180.
14.
J. Gusfield , The literary rhetoric of science: comedy and pathos in drinking driver dresearch, Amer. Sociological Rev.41 (1976) 16-34.
15.
I. Illich, Tools for Conviviality (Calder & Boyars, London, 1973).
16.
K.D. Knorr-Cetina , The Manufacture of Knowledge' An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981).
17.
G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors we Live By (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1980).
18.
M.J. Mahoney , Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative (Balinger, Cambridge. MA., 1976).
19.
P.B. Medawar , Is the scientific paper a fraud?, The Listener (12/9/63) 377-378.
20.
I.I. Mitroff , The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists ( Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1974).
21.
I.I. Mitroff and R.O. Mason, Creating a Dialectical Social Science: Concepts. Methods and Models (Reidel. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1981).
22.
J. Needham, History and human values: a Chinese perspective for world science and technology , in: H. Rose and S. Rose, Eds., The Radicalisation of Science: Ideology of/in the Natural Sciences (Macmillan, London, 1976) 90-117.
23.
S.D. Neill , Brookes, Popper, and objective knowledge, J. Information Sci.4 (1982) 33-39.
24.
S. Nora and A. Minc, The Computerization of Society: A Report to the President of France (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA., 1980).
25.
M. Polanyi , The potential theory of absorption, Science141 (1963) 1010-1013.
D. Robbins and R. Johnston, The role of cognitive and occupational differentiation in scientific controversies. Social Studies of Science6 (1976) 349-368.
28.
Royal Society, Study of the Scientific Information System in the United Kingdom (The Society, London, 1981).
29.
D. Rudd, Letter to the editor, Aslib Proc. 34 (9) (1982) 420-421.
30.
T. Stonier, The electronic future: impact on work and society, Aslib Proc. 34 (2) (1982) 133-139.
31.
D.R. Swanson , Libraries and the growth of knowledge, Library Quart.50 (1980) 112-134.
32.
D.F. Swift, V.A. Winn and D.A. Bramer, A case study in indexing and classification in the sociology of education: Development of ideas concerning the organization of matenal for literature searching, Open University, Milton Keynes(1973).
33.
W. van den Daele , The social construction of science: institutionalisation and definition of positive science in the latter half of the seventeenth century , in: E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart and R. Whitley , Eds., The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1977) 27-54.
34.
B. Wynne, Physics and psychics: science, symbolic action, and social control in late Victorian England. in: B. Barnes and S. Shapin, Eds., Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture (Sage, Beverly Hills, 1979) 167-186.
35.
S. Yearley , Textual persuasion: the role of social accounting in the construction of scientific arguments, Philosophy of the Social Sciences11 (1981) 409-435.
36.
R.M. Young, The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth century debate about man's place in nature, in: M. Teich and R.M. Young, Eds., Perspectives in the History of Science (Heinemann, London, 1970).