AlterS.L., Decision Support Systems: Current Practice and Continuing Challenges (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA,1980).
2.
BezillaR., Online messages, files, text and publishing, Online6 (2) (1982) 51-55.
3.
BrittainJ.M., Information needs and application of the results of user studies, in: DebonsA., and CameronW.J., eds., Perspectives in Information Science (Noordhoff, Leyden, 1975) pp. 425-447.
4.
BrittainJ.M., Pitfalls of user oriented research, and some neglected areas, in: FribergI., ed., Proc. IRFIS 4, 14-16, Sept. 1981, Boras, Sweden (Hogskolan i Boras, Borås, 1982) pp. 213-227.
5.
ChurchmanC.W., The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization (Basic Books, New York, 1971).
6.
CrawfordS., Information needs and uses, in: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Vol. 13 (1978) (ASIS, Washington D.C., 1978) pp. 61-81.
7.
DavisR., Interactive transfer of expertise: acquisition of new inference rules.Artificial Intelligence12 (2) (1979) 121-158.
8.
DruckerP.F., The Effective Executive (Harper and Row, New York, 1966).
9.
EngelbartD.C.Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework. Summary report, project no. 3587 (Stanford Research Institute, 1962).
10.
EngelbartD.C., Coordinated information services for a discipline or mission-oriented community, in: GrimsdaleR.L., and KuoF.F., eds., Computer Communication Networks (Noordhoff., Leyden, 1975).
11.
EngelbertH., Der Informationsbedarf in der Wissenschaft (Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig, 1976).
12.
FeinmanS., A conceptual framework for information flow studies, in: S. Martin, ed., Information * Politics: Proc. 39th ASIS Ann. Meeting 1976, Washington D.C., vol. 13, part 2 (ASIS, Washington, D.C., 1976) pp. 1-10.
13.
KingD.W., Telecommunications and Libraries: A Primer for Librarians and Information Managers (Knowledge Industry Publications, New York, 1981).
14.
KunzW., and RittelH., Zur Logik von Forschung und Dokumentation, Die Naturwissenschaften55 (8) (1968) 358-361.
15.
KunzW., and RittelH., A Systems Analysis of the Logic of Research and Information Processes (Verlag Dokumentation, Munchen, 1977).
16.
KunzW., RittelH., and SchwuchowW., Methods of Analysis and Evaluation of Information Needs: a Critical Review (Verlag Dokumentation, Munchen, 1977).
17.
LineM.B., Draft definitions, Aslib Proc.26 (2) (1974) p. 87.
18.
MenzelH., Information needs and uses in science and technology, in: CuadraC.A., ed., Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 1 (1966) (ASIS, Washington DC.1966) pp. 41-69.
19.
MickC., LindseyG.N., and CallahanD., Toward usable user studies, J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci.31 (5) (1980) 347-356.
20.
PaisleyW., Information needs and uses, in: CuadraC.A. ed., Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 3 (1968) (ASIS, Washington DC, 1968) pp. 1-30.
21.
RepoJ., Access to information and the new telematic technology (in Finnish). Research Notes, no. 114 (Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 1982).
22.
RautioP., and SuhonenP., The use of citation analysis in the study of scientific communication in the social sciences. Paper presented at the Science and Technology Conference, OECD, Paris, 1980.
23.
SusmanG.I., and EveredR.D., An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Admin. Sci. Quart.23 (1978) 582-603.
24.
WeinstockN., Citation indexes, in: KentA., ed., Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, vol. 5 (Dekker, New York, 1971) pp. 16-40.
25.
WersigG., Informationssoziologie: Hinweise zu einem Informationswissenschaflichen Teilbereich (Athenaum Fischer, Frankfurt (aM), 1973).
26.
WilsonT.D., and StreatfieldD.R., Action research and user's needs, in: FrihergI., ed., Proc. IRFIS 4, 14-16 Sept. 1981, Boras, Sweden (Hogskolan i Boras, Boras, 1982) pp. 51-70.